Skip to main content
Log in

Rhizoctonia disease of potatoes (Rhizoctonia solani): Fungicidal efficacy and cultivar susceptibility

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhizoctonia stem canker and black scurf is an economically important disease of potatoes in Alberta and around the world. It reduces the quality and yield of potatoes and has become an important impediment for export of seed potatoes, especially to Mexico. Seed treatment using fungicides, presently registered in Canada, are not effective in controlling the disease to growers’ satisfaction. Field experiments conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various fungicides showed that captan (Captan), iprodione (Rovral), mancozeb (Tuberseal), and fludioxonil (Maxim) provide effective control of the disease. Of these fungicides, fludioxonil consistently provided superior protection. Based on the results of this study, Maxim was registered in 2000 for control of this disease in Canada. Potato cultivars/breeding selections showed a range of susceptibility reactions toR. solani but none of these was completely resistant to the disease. The information on comparative susceptibility of potato cultivars will help the growers make informed decisions regarding the management of this disease. Of six plant species (Beta vulgaris,Brassica compestris, Hordeum vulgare, Pisum sativum,Triticum aestivum, Zea mays) most commonly used in rotation with potatoes in Alberta, none was infected by potato isolates ofR. solani. The results suggested that use of these plant species as rotation crops with potatoes in Alberta will help in reducing the development of rhizoctonia disease in potatoes.

Resumen

El cancro del tallo y costra negra causado por la rizoctonia es una de las enfermedades económicamente más importantes de las papas en Alberta y otras partes del mundo. Esta enfermedad reduce la calidad y el rendimiento de los tubérculos y se ha convertido en una limitación importante para la exportación de semillas de papa especialmente a México. El tratamiento de las semillas usando fungicidas, de preferencia registrados en Canada, no cumple las expectativas de los agricultores sobre el control de la enfermedad. Los experimentos en campo realizados para evaluar la eficacia de diversos fungicidas muestran que el captan (Captan), iprodione (Rovral), mancozeb (Tuberseal) y fludioxonil (Maxim) proporcionan un control efectivo de la enfermedad. De todos ellos, el fludioxonil proporciona una protección superior. Basados en los resultados de esta estudio, en el 2000 se registró a Maxim para el control de esta enfermedad en Canadá. Los cultivares de papa/selecciones por mejoramiento mostraron una gama de reacciones de susceptibilidad a R. solani pero ninguno fue completamente resistente a la enfermedad. La información sobre susceptibilidad comparada de los cultivares de papa ayudará a los agricultores a tomar decisones sobre la base de una mejor información considerando el manejo de esta enfermedad. De las seis especies de plantas más comúnmente usadas en rotación con las papas en Alberta (Beta vulgaris, Brassica compestris, Hordeum vulgare, Pisum sativum, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays), ninguna fue infectada con aislamientos de R. solani. Esos resultados sugieren que el uso de esas especies de plantas como cultivos rotatorios con las papas en Alberta podrían ayudar a reducir el desarrollo de la rizoctonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anonymous. n.d. North American Potato Varieties. The Potato Association of America, Orono ME.

  • Bains, P.S., and V.S. Bisht. 1995. Anastomosis group identity and virulenceof Rhizoctonia solani isolates collected from potato plants in Alberta, Canada. Plant Dis 79:241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banville, G.J. 1989. Yield loss and damage to potato plants caused byRhizoctonia solani Kühn. Am Potato J 66:821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K.F. 1970. Types ofRhizoctonia disease and their occurrence.In: Parmeter Jr., J.R. (ed),Rhizoctonia solani: Biology and Pathology. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, G.M., and I.W.W.M. Schrage. 1993. Potato Varieties in Canada. New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, NB, Canada, 130p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling, D.E., K.M. Kebler, and R.H. Leiner. 1986. Interactions betweenRhizoctonia solani AG- 3 and 27 plant species. Plant Dis 70:577–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, D.E., R.H. Leiner, and P.C. Westphale. 1989. Symptoms, signs and yield reduction associated with rhizoctonia disease of potato induced by tuberborne inoculum ofRhizoctonia solani AG-3. Am Potato J 66:693–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowley, L.J. 1972. Varietal susceptibility of potato tubers toRhizoctonia solani in Ireland. Ir J Agric Res 11:281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.A., and S.S. Leach. 1980. Comparison of tuberborne and soilborne inoculum in the rhizoctonia disease of potato. Phytopathology 70:51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.A., S.S. Leach, and R.E. Web. 1976. Evaluation of potato clone reaction toRhizoctonia solani. Plant Dis Rep 60:910–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.A., and H.J. Murphy. 1977. The effect of crop rotations on rhizoctonia disease of potatoes. Am Potato J 54:315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmestad, N.C., R.T. Zink, and J.E. Huguelet. 1979. The effect of harvest date and tuber-borne sclerotia on the severity of rhizoctonia disease of potato. Am Potato J 45:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hide, G.A., and F. Bell. 1978. Healthier seed potatoes. 1. Effects of inoculating stem cutting stocks withPolyscytalum pustulans andRhizoctonia solani in growth, yield and disease. Ann Appl Biol 90:417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hide, G.A., and G.R. Cayley. 1982. Chemical techniques for control of stem canker and black scurf(Rhizoctonia solani) disease of potatoes. Ann Appl Biol 100:105–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hide, G.A., and J.K. Horrocks. 1994. Influence of stem canker (Rhizoctonia solani Kühn) on tuber yield, tuber size, reducing sugars and crisp colour in cv. Record. Potato Research 37:43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.B., and N.A. Anderson. 1989. An evaluation of potato disease caused by isolates ofRhizoctonia solani AG-3. Am Potato J 66:709–721.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, C.W., W.M. Clapham, and S.S. Leach. 1996. Crop rotation and N fertilization effects on growth, yield, and disease incidence in potato. Am Potato J 73:45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsfall, J.G., and R.W. Barratt. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases. Phytopathology 35:655. (Abst)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager, G., H. Velvis, J.G. Lamers, A. Mulder, and Js. Roosjen. 1991. Control ofRhizoctonia solani in potato by biological, chemical and integrated measures. Potato Res 34:269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawchuk, L.M., J.D. Holley, D.R. Lynch, and R.M. Clear. 1994. Resistance to thiabendazole and thiophanate-methyl in Canadian isolates ofFusarium sambucinum andHelminthosporium solani. Am Potato J 71:185–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, S.S., and T.E. Web. 1993. Evaluation of potato cultivars, clones and a true seed population for resistance toRhizoctonia solani. Am Potato J 70:317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lootsma, M., and K. Scholte. 1996. Effects of soil disinfection and potato harvesting methods on stem infection byRhizoctonia solani Kühn in the following year. Potato Res 39:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otrysko, B.E., and G.J. Banville. 1992. Effect of infection byRhizoctonia solani on the quality of tubers for processing. Am Potato J 69:645–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, H.J. 1989. Potato growth and tuber production as affected by inoculation of cut and whole seed withRhizoctonia solani (AG 3) and the use of seed treatment fungicide. Am Potato J 66:365–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, H.J., F. Canals, and G. Geminis. 1993. Effects of tuber-borne inoculum ofRhizoctonia solani and fungicidal seed potato treatment on plant growth and rhizoctonia disease in Canada and Uruguay. Am Potato J 70:553–559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, K. 1987. The effect of crop rotation and granular nematicides on the incidenceof Rhizoctonia solani in potato. Potato Res 30:187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, W.R., J. Stewart, and P. Sanderson. 1986. The effect of thiabendazole seed-piece treatment on Monona potatoes in Wisconsin. Am Potato J 63:815–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgen-Calleros, G., V. Olalde-Portugal, and D.E. Carling. 2000. Anastomosis group ofRhizoctonia solani on potato in central Mexico and potential for biological and chemical control. Am J Potato Res 77:219–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold, A.R., T. Bowman, and D.H. hall. 1982. Rhizoctonia disease of potato: effect on yield and control by seed tuber treatment. Plant Dis 66:815–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, T.J., B. Morgan, and B. Hall. 1996. Influence of soil fumigation and seed tuber treatment on the control ofRhizoctonia solani on potatoes. Aust J Exp Agric 36:339–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, R.C. 1988. Development ofRhizoctonia solani on four fungicide-treated potato cultivars grown in virgin potato soil. Can Plant Dis Surv 68:7–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bains, P.S., Bennypaul, H.S., Lynch, D.R. et al. Rhizoctonia disease of potatoes (Rhizoctonia solani): Fungicidal efficacy and cultivar susceptibility. Am. J. Pot Res 79, 99–106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881518

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881518

Additional key words

Navigation