Abstract
A transformation system was established for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) mature zygotic embryos usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens. The gene coding for the β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene was introduced into loblolly pine tissues and its transient expression was detected with histochemical staining. The influences of different genotypes.Agrobacterum concentrations. and cocultivation time on GUS expression and kanamycin resistant callus and shoot regeneration were investigated. The results showed that the highest GUS expression frequency (16.3%) and shoot regeneration frequency (78%) were obtained from genotype 9–1003 withAgrobacterium concentration decreased 9 times and cocultivation time of 56 hours respectively. GUS expression was obtained in all genotypes tested. The successful expression of the GUS gene in different genotypes suggested that it will be a useful transformation system for loblolly pine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellis, D., Roberts, D., Sutton, B., 1989. Transformation of white spruce and other conifer species byAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep.8: 16–20.
Loopstra, C.A., Stomp, A.M., and Sederoff, R. 1990.Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer in sugar pine. Plant Mol. Biol15: 1–9
Sederoff, R., Stomp, A.M., and Chilton, W.S. 1986. Gene transfer into loblolly pine byAgrobacterium tumefactens. Bin/Technology.4: 647–649
Jouanin, I., Brasileiro, A.M., and Leple, J.C. 1993. Genetic transformation: a short review of methods and their applications results and perspectives for fores trees. Ann Sci. For.50: 325–336.
Ellis, D., McCabe, D.E., and Meinnis, S. 1993. Stable transformation ofPicea glanca by particle acceleration. Bio/Technology,11:84–89
Levee, V., Lelu A.M., Jouanin, L. 1997.Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid larch and transgenic plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep.16: 680–685
Gupta, P.K., Dandekar, A.M., and Durzan, D.J. 1988. Somatic proembryo formation and transient expression of a luciferase gene in Douglas fir and loblolly pine pretoplast. Plant Sci.58: 85–92.
Robertson, D., Weissinger, A.K., and Ackley. R. 1992. Genetic transformation of Norway spruce using somatic embry. explants by microprojectile bombardment. Plant Mol. Biol. 925–935
Charest, P.J., Devantier, Y., and Lachance, D. 1996. Stable genetic transformation ofPicea mariana via microprojectile bombardment. In Vitro Cell Dev. Brol.32: 91–99
Gupta, P.K., Durzan, D.J. 1986 Somatic polyembryogenesis from callus of mature supar pine embryos. Bio/Technology.4: 643–645
Jefferson, R.A. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Res.5(4):387–405
Cheng, M., Jarret, R.L. and Li Z. 1996. Production of fertile transgenic peanut plants usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep.15: 653–657
Tautorus, T.E., Fowke, L.C., and Dunstan, D.I. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in conifers. Can. J. Bot.69: 1876–1899
Ellis, D., McCabe, D., and Russell, D. 1991. Expression of inducible angiosperm promoters in a gymnosperm.Picea glauca. Plant Mol. Biol.17: 19–27.
Tian, L., Seguin A., and Charest, P.J. 1997. Expression of the green fluorescent protein gene in conifer tissues. Plant Cell Rep.16:267–271
Duchesne, L.C., Charest, P.J. 1991. Transient expression of the β-glucuronidase gene in embryogenic callus ofPicea mariana following microprojection. Plant Cell Rep.10:191–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
(Responsible Editor: Chai Ruihai)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, T., Yingchuan, T. & Fan, O. Preliminary studies on establishment of genetic transformation system in loblolly pine. Journal of Forestry Research 8, 201–205 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875003
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875003