Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between yield, mainstem number, and tuber number in five maincrop and two early-maturing cultivars

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data from an 11-year period, total and marketable yield were related, using regression analysis, to mainstem and tuber number for five maincrop varieties (Russet Burbank, Shepody, Atlantic, Norchip, and Norland) and two early-maturing varieties (Conestoga and Carlton), at irrigated and dryland sites in western Canada. Mainstem number by itself was a poor predictor of total and marketable yield. Highly significant regressions of yield on the derived variable tuber number per mainstem were evident for all cultivars grown at the dryland sites. In general, the proportion of the total variation in yield accounted for by the regression models was much higher at the dryland than at the irrigated sites, indicating that the relationship between yield and its predictor variables was more complex for irrigated sites. While the study suggests that the use of tuber number per mainstem may be useful as an early-season predictor of tuber yield for cultivars, particularly under dryland conditions, a model using the predictor variables mainstem and tuber number will generally be superior due to the additional information it provides when competitive effects are present for light energy within the canopy or for assimilates among developing tubers. Contour plots provide a useful way to study the yield response to changes in tuber number at specific stem density levels.

Resumen

Usando análisis de regresión en un período de 11 años para evaluar los tallos principales y el número de tubérculos de cinco variedades principales (Russet Burbank, Shepody, Atlantic, Norchip y Norland) y dos variedades precoces (Conestoga and Carlton), de zonas irrigadas y de secano del oeste de Canada, se encontró una relación entre los rendimientos totales y comerciales. El número de tallos principales por sí mismo era un pobre indicador del rendimiento total y comercial. En todos los cultivares cultivados en zonas de secano se hizo evidente una regresión altamente significativa del rendimiento en la variable derivada del número de tubérculos por tallo principal. En general, la proporción de la variación total en los rendimientos contabilizados por los modelos de regresión fue mucho mayor en las zonas de secano que en las irrigadas, lo que indicaba que la relación entre el rendimiento y sus variables de pronóstico era más compleja para las zonas irrigadas. Si bien el estudio sugiere que el uso de número de tubérculos por tallo principal puede ser útil como un pronóstico precoz del rendimiento de tubérculos por cultivar durante la temporada, particularmente bajo condiciones de secano, un modelo que use las variables de tallo principal y número de tubérculos como predicción, generalmente será superior debido a la información adicional que proporciona cuando están presentes los efectos de competencia, por la energía de la luz dentro de la canopa o por asimilaciones entre los tubérculos en desarrollo. Las parcelas de contorno proporcionan una vía útil para estudiar la respuesta del rendimiento a los cambios en el número de tubérculos a niveles específicos de densidad de tallo.

Palabras claves: Rendimiento de tubérculo, número de tallos, número de tubérculos, Russet Burbank, Shepody, Atlantic, Norchip, Norland, Conestoga, Carlton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

STEM:

mainstem number

TYLD:

total tuber yield

TNUM:

total tuber number

MYLD:

yield of > 55-mm tubers

MNUM:

number of > 55-mm tubers

TPS:

total tuber number per stem

Literature Cited

  • Allen, E. J. 1978. Plant density. In: Harris, P.M. (ed), The Potato Crop-The Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 278–326.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bleasdale, J.K.A. 1965. Relationships between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes. J Agric Sci 64:361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N.R. and H. Smith. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P.B., A. Brown, J.H. Lennard, and F.L. Milthorpe. 1969. Effect of centre of production, maturity and storage treatment of seed tubers on the growth of early potatoes. II. Field Growth. J Agric Sci Camb 73:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. 1972. Spacing and harvest date experiments with Maris Peer potatoes. J Agric Sci Camb 79:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J.C. 1973. Relationship between stem number and tuber number in the potato crop. Proc. 5th Triennial Conference, Eur. Assn for Potato Res, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irritani, W.M., R. Thornton, L. Wilier, and G. O’Leary. 1972. Relationships of seed size, spacing and stem numbers to the yield of Russet Burbank. Am Potato J 49:463–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, S.L., C.V. Eberlein, J.C. Stark, and W.H. Bohl. 1995. Cultivar and seedpiece spacing effects on potato competitiveness with weeds. Am Potato J 72:197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D.R. and R.G. Rowberry. 1977. Population density studies with Russet Burbank. I. Yield/stem density models. Am Potato J 54:43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D.R. and G.C.C. Tai. 1985. Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R. and R.N. Curnow. 1983. Statistical Methods in agriculture and Experimental Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rex. B.L. 1991. The effect of in-row seed spacing and harvest date on the tuber yield and processing quality of Conestoga potatoes in southern Manitoba. Can J Plant Sci 71:289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 6. 4th edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1990. SAS/GRAPH software: Reference, version 6. lst ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Sharpe, PR., and J.B. Dent. 1968. Determination and economic analysis of relationships between plant population and yield of main crop potatoes. J Agric Sci 70:123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R.W. and S.B. Heath. 1969. The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yield. In: Brady, N.C. (ed), Advances in Agronomy, vol. 21. Academic Press, Inc., New York. pp. 281–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurr, D.C.E. 1974. Some effects of seed size and spacing on the yield and grading of two maincrop varieties. I. Final yield and its relationship to plant population. J Agric Sci Camb 82:37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. R. Lynch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, D.R., Kozub, G.C. & Kawchuk, L.M. The relationship between yield, mainstem number, and tuber number in five maincrop and two early-maturing cultivars. Am. J. Pot Res 78, 83–90 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874763

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874763

Additional Key Words

Navigation