Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of environmental variables on performance of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in a long term trial: a statistical approach

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tuber yield, together with tuber number and size are the basic agronomic and breeding traits in Jerusalem artichoke and can be significantly affected by environmental factors. We report the results of a long term trial on the performance of 20 Jerusalem artichoke cultivars. The random model for means with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) procedure was used to estimate the overall effects of the genotype, environment and genotype by environment interaction on traits. The partial least square regression (PLSR) model was used for modeling genotype by environment interaction variance components with a set of available correlated environmental variables. The REML variance component estimates model revealed that tuber number and yield are more dependent on GE interaction which allowed identification of best genotypes for specific environments. The PLSR model revealed that the most important climatic variables for optimal emergence, canopy development, high tuber number and yield are adequate soil and air temperatures in April. For larger tuber mass, precipitation variables and even distribution of rainfall were the most important factor, together with soil and air temperature in June when tuber growth is initiated. The knowledge obtained in this study is valuable for the identification and understanding of key environmental factors that contribute to the performance of Jerusalem artichoke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annicchiarico P (2002) Genotype × environment Interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldini M, Danuso F, Monti A, Amaducci MT, Stevanato P, De Mastro G (2006) Chicory and Jerusalem Artichoke productivity in different areas of Italy, in relation to water availability and time of harvest. Ital J Agron 2:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini M, Francesco D, Alvaro R, Elena B, Monti A, Giuseppe DM (2011) Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) productivity in different Italiangrowing areas: a modelling approach. Ital J Agron 6:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove DR, Oelke EA, Doll DJ, Davis DW, Undersander DJ, Oplinger ES (2000) Jerusalem Artichoke. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcm/jerusart.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2016

  • Crossa J (2012) From genotype × environment interaction to gene × environment interaction. Curr Genom 13:225–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, Burgueño J, Vargas M (2010) Statistical models for studying and understanding genotype × environment interaction in an era of climate change and increased genetic information. In: Reynolds M (ed) Climate change and crop production, CABI Climate Change Series. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 263–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janket A, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Holbrook C, Patanothai A (2013) Genetic diversity of water use efficiency in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) germplasm. Aust J Crop Sci 7:1670–1681

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang MS (2004) Breeding: genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 218–221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kays SJ, Kultur F (2005) Genetic variation in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) flowering date and duration. HortScience 40:1675–1678

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays SJ, Nottingham SF (2007) Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis L, Kaul H-P, Praznik W, Liebhard P (2007) Influence of harvest date on shoot and tuber yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semiarid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 11:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis L, Kaul H-P, Praznik W, Liebhard P (2008) Influence of harvest date on tuber growth tuber dry matter content, inulin and sugar yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semi-arid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 12:8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Malosetti M, Ribaut J-M, van Eeuwijk FA (2013) The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front Physiol 4:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paungbut D, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Patanothai A (2015) Growth and phenology of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Pak J Bot 47:2207–2214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimsaen W, Jogloy S, Suriharn B, Kesmala T, Pensuk V, Patanothai A (2010) Genotype by environment (G × E) interactions for yield components of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Asian J Plant Sci 9:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puangbut D, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Patanothai A (2015) Responses of growth, physiological traits and tuber yield in Helianthus tuberosus to seasonal variations under tropical area. Sci Hortic 195:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puttha R, Jogloy S, Wangsomnuk PP, Srijaranai S, Kesmala T, Patanothai A (2012) Genotypic variability and genotype by environment interactions for inulin content of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm. Euphytica 183:119–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puttha R, Jogloy S, Suriharn B, Wangsomnuk PP, Kesmala T, Patanothai A (2013) Variations in morphological and agronomic traits among Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) accessions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:731–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2016

  • Roberfroid M (2005) Inulin-type fructans: functional food ingredient. CRC Series in Modern Nutrition, CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttanaprasert R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Kanwar RS, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2013) Photoperiod and growing degree days effect on drymatter partitioning in Jerusalem artichoke. Int J Plant Prod 7:393–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2006) Genetic variability for mineral concentration in the forage of Jerusalem artichoke cultivars. Euphytica 150:281–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somda ZC, McLaurin WJ, Kays SJ (1999) Jerusalem artichoke growth, development, and field storage. II. Carbon and nutrient element allocation and redistribution. J Plant Nutr 22:1315–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springate D, Kover P (2014) Plant responses to elevated temperatures: a field study on phenological sensitivity and fitness responses to simulated climate warming. Glob Chang Biol 20:456–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc B 36:111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzić S, Mikić A, Atlagić J, Ćupina B, Antanasović S (2011) Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) accessions for forage production. Eucarpia 29th Fodder Crops & Amenity Grasses Section Meeting. September 4th-8th, Dublin, Ireland, pp 78

  • Terzić S, Atlagić J, Maksimović I, Zeremski T, Petrović S, Dedić B (2012a) Influence of photoperiod on vegetation phases and tuber development in topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Arch Biol Sci 64:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzić S, Atlagić J, Maksimović I, Zeremski T, Zorić M, Miklič V, Balalić I (2012b) Genetic variability for mineral concentration in tubers and leaves of Jerusalem artichoke. Sci Hortic 136:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eeuwijk FA, Denis JB, Kang MS (1996) Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG Jr (eds) Genotype by environment interaction: new perspectives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 15–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas M, Crossa J, Sayre K, Reynolds M, Ramirez ME, Talbot M (1998) Interpreting genotype × environment interaction in wheat using partial least squares regression. Crop Sci 38:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, He QS, Corscadden K, Udenigwe CC (2015) The prospects of Jerusalem artichoke in functional food ingredients and bioenergy production. Biotechnol Rep 5:77–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science of the Republic of Serbia through a project number TR–31025. The authors wish to thank Mrs. Nancy Borchetta who assisted in English proof-reading of the manuscript. A large number of researchers contributed to the establishment and evaluation of Jerusalem artichoke collection. We owe the late dr Janoš Berenji special gratitude, for supporting the Jerusalem artichoke breeding program at IFVCNS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sreten Terzić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zorić, M., Terzić, S., Sikora, V. et al. Effect of environmental variables on performance of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in a long term trial: a statistical approach. Euphytica 213, 23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1819-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1819-7

Keywords

Navigation