Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of recent growth history on the phenotype ofEscherichia coli

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Escherichia coli, strain 300U, was grown for 450 generations in 6 different media. Each line was then subcultured into each of the 6 media, and allowed to grow for about 12 generations. The growth rates and rates of induced β-galactosidase synthesis were, as expected, highly dependent on the medium in which the cells were growing at the time of sampling. Both parameters, and particularly β-galactosidase synthesis, also showed some influence of the medium in which the cells had previously been grown. Of 26 soluble protein components separated by gel electrophoresis in the same experiment, 9 were highly dependent on the current medium, with insignificant effects of the previous growth conditions; 4 were significantly affected by the previous medium but were not influenced by the current medium; 3 were influenced both by current and earlier growth conditions; and 10 components showed no variation. In further experiments, the kinetics of labelled phenylalanine incorporation into soluble proteins were studied by pulse-labelling during growth upshifts and downshifts. The responses of the various protein components to the growth shift were kinetically variable; some responded immediately while in others the response was delayed. In other cases, a series of oscillations were observed after an initial response, while a final category showed little response to the growth shift. The proportional incorporation of phenylalanine into the different bands was still changing 1–2 generations after the shift. It is concluded that a period of adaptation of at least 12 generations is required for cells to reach a new equilibrium after a growth shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branscomb E. W., Stuart R. N.: Induction lag as a function of induction level.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 32, 731 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn M., Horibata K.: Inhibition by glucose of the induced synthesis of the β-galactosidase enzyme system ofEscherichia coli.J. Bacteriol. 78, 601 (1959).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean A. C. R., Hinshelwood C.: Growth, function and regulation in bacterial cells. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks G. Jr.,Levinthal C., Reeder R. H.: Analysis of14C-labelled protein by disc electrophoresis.Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 20, 393 (1965).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kepes A.: Kinetics of induced enzyme synthesis. Determination of the mean life of galactosidase-specific messenger ribonucleic acid.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 76, 293 (1963).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr, A. L., Randall R. J.: Protein measurements with the Folinphenol reagent.J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265 (1951).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maaloe O., Kjeldgaard N. O.: Control of Macromolecular Synthesis. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magasanik B.: Catabolite repression.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 26, 249 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moses V., Prevost C.: Catabolite repression of β-galactosidase synthesis inEscherichia coli.Biochem. J. 100, 336 (1966).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moses V., Sharp P. B.: Adenosine 3′:5′-cyclic-monophosphate and catabolite repression inEscherichia coli.Biochem. J. 118, 481 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moses V., Wild D. G.: Soluble protein profiles inEscherichia coli.Folia Microbiol. 14, 305 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paigen K.: Phenomenon of transient repression inEscherichia coli.J. Bacteriol. 91, 1201 (1966).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J., Moses V.: The role of the regulator-gene product (repressor) in catabolite repression of β-galactosidase synthesis inEscherichia coli.Biochem. J. 106, 339 (1968).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pardee A. B., Prestidge L. S.: The initial kinetics of enzyme induction.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 49, 77 (1961).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost C., Moses V.: Pool sizes of metabolic intermediates and their relation to glucose repression of β-galactosidase synthesis inEscherichia coli.Biochem. J. 103, 349 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler B., Magasanik B.: Molecular basis of transient repression of β-galactosidase inEscherichia coli.J. Bacteriol. 97, 550 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yudkin M. D.: Transient repression of β-galactosidase synthesis: effect of growth history.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 190, 220 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moses, V., Sharp, P.B. The influence of recent growth history on the phenotype ofEscherichia coli . Folia Microbiol 17, 1–16 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872248

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872248

Keywords

Navigation