Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytology and genetics of forage grasses

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Aase, H. C. Cytology of cereals. Bot. Rev.1: 467–496. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  2. — andPowers, Le Roy. Chromosome numbers in crop plants. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 367–372. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akerberg, E. Studien über die Samenbildung beiPoa pratensis L. Bot. Not. 1936: 213–280. 1936. [Eng. sum.]

  4. —. Bastard mellanPoa Pratensis L. ×P. alpina L., artificiellt framställd. Bot. Not.1936: 563–566. 1936. [Herb. Rev.5: 32–33. 1937].

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. [Seed production of thePoa species], Svensk. Frötidning7: 79–83. 1938. [Herb. Rev.6: 228–233. 1938].

    Google Scholar 

  6. —. Apomictic and sexual seed formation inPoa Pratensis. Hereditas25: 359–370. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —. Cytogenetic studies inPoa pratensis and its hybrid withPoa alpina. Hereditas28: 1–126. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —. Further studies of the embryo and endosperm development inPoa pratensis. Hereditas29: 199–201. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akins, Virginiaet al. Summary of cytological and other investigations of certainAgropyron species, 1942. [Mim.]

  10. Andersen, A. M. Development of the female gametophyte and caryopsis ofPoa pratensis andPoa compressa. Jour. Agr. Res.34: 1001–1018. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen, S. Graes-Hybrider in Danmark. Bot. Tids.41: 424–430. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, E. Cytological observations onTripsacum dactyloides. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.31: 317–323. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. — andSax, K. A. cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.97: 433–476. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrés, J. M. Numero de cromosomas en las especies del géneroHordeum espontáneas en los alrededores de Buenos Aires. Rev. Fac. Agron., Buenos Aires9: 100–108. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Araratian, A. G. [The chromosome numbers of certain species and forms ofAgropyron]. Sovetskaja Botanika No.6: 109–211. 1938. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 310. 1939].

  16. Arenkova, D. N. Polyploid races in millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.29: 332–335. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Armstrong, J. M. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. I. Crossing results and description of the first generation hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res., C,14: 190–202. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —. A cytological study of the genusPoa. Canad. Jour. Res., C,15: 281–297. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  19. — andMcLennan, H. A. Amphidiploidy inTriticum-AgroPyron hybrids. Sci. Agr.24: 285–298. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Artemova, A. [Hybrids of wheat andAgropyron]. Semenovodstvo No. 5:37–20. 1935. [Pl. Br. Abs.6: 41. 1935].

  21. Avdulov, N. P. Karyo-systematische Untersuchung der Familie Gramineen. Suppl. 43, Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed. 1931. [Ger. sum.]

  22. —. Karyologische Ergänzungsdaten zur Systematik der Gramineen. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br., II: 131–136. 1933. [Russ., Ger. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  23. — andTitova, N. [Additional chromosomes inPaspalum stoloniferum Bosco.]. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br. II: 165–172. 1933. [Pl. Br. Abs.4: 37. 1933].

    Google Scholar 

  24. Babcock, E. B. Systematics, cytogenetics and evolution inCrepis. Bot. Rev.8: 139–190. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barker, H. D. andHayes, H. K. Rust resistance in timothy. Phytopathology14: 363–371. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barr, C. G. andNewcomer, E. H. Physiological aspects of tetraploidy in cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.67: 329–336. 1943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck, P. andHorton, J. S. Microsporogenesis and embryogeny in certain species ofBromus. Bot. Gaz.93: 42–54. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beddows, A. R. Seed setting and flowering in various grasses. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H., No.12: 5–99. 1931.

  29. Bennett, H. W. Embryology ofPaspalum dilatatum. Bot. Gaz.106: 40–45. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. - andHogg, P. G. The F2 and F3 generations of a sorghum × Johnson grass hybrid. Proc. 43rd Conv. Assoc. So. Agr. Wrks., Memphis, Tenn.1942: 84–85.

  31. Berg, K. H. von. Autotetraploidie beiHordeum bulbosum L. Der Züchter8: 151–158. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bezradecki, S. [Studies of grasses. I. The influence of continuous selling upon the development and yield inPhleum pratense.] Mem. Inst. Polon. Écon. Rur.15: 227–241. 1936. [Ger. sum.] [Herb. Abs.6: 436. 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bhaduri, P. N. Application of new technique to cyto-genetical reinvestigation of the genusTradescantia. Jour. Genet.44: 87–127. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Blakeslee, A. F. Dédoublement du nombre de chromosomes chez les plantes par traitment chimique. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris205: 476–479. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  35. — andAverv, A. G. Methods of inducing chromosome doubling in plants by treatment with colchicine. Jour. Hered.28: 393–411. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. — andWarmke, H. E. Size of seed and other criteria of polyploids. Science88: 440. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bond Aren ko, G. K. [The effects of environmental conditions on the fertility of the first generation ofTriticum-Agropyron hybrids]. Jarovizacija No.4: 95–100. 1939. [Herb. Abs.10: 303. 1940].

  38. Bourne, B. A. A comparative study of certain morphological characters of sugarcane × sorgo hybrids. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 539–552. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bowden, W. M. Diploidy, polyploidy, and winterhardiness relationships in the flowering plants. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 357–371. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bowman, D. H.et al. Inheritance of resistance toPythium root rot in sorghum. Jour. Agr. Res.55: 105–115. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bremmer, G. A cytological investigation of some species and species hybrids within the genusSaccharum. Genetica5: 97–148, 273–326. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. —. The cytology of the sugar cane. III. The chromosomes of primitive forms of the genusSaccharum. Genetica7: 293–322. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. —. Short remarks on the cytology ofSaccharum. Proc. Congr. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Tech.3: 403–408. 1930. [Pl. Br. Abs.1: 40–41. 1930].

    Google Scholar 

  44. —. [The cytology of the sugar cane. V. An investigation of the somatic numbers of the sugar cane]. Arch. Suikerind. Ned. Ind.3: 583–607. 1931. [Pl. Br. Abs.2: 32–33. 1932].

    Google Scholar 

  45. —. [The cytology of the sugar cane. VI. A cytological investigation of a number of original Indian cane varieties]. Arch. Suikerind Ned.-Ind.3: 1349–1391. 1931. [Pl. Br. Abs.2: 141. 1932].

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brink, R. A. andCooper, D. C. The antipodals in relation to abnormal endosperm behavior inHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale hybrid seeds. Genetics29: 391–406. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. —et al. A hybrid betweenHordeum jubatum andSecale cereale reared from an artificially cultivated embryo. Jour. Hered.35: 67–75. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brittingham, W. H. An artificially produced hybrid betweenPoa compressa L. andP. pratensis L. Genetics26: 141–142. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  49. —. An artificial hybrid between two species of bluegrass, Canada bluegrass (Poa compressa L.) and Kentucky bluegrass (P. pratensis L.). Jour. Hered.32: 57–63. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  50. —. Type of seed formation as indicated by the nature and extent of variation in Kentucky bluegrass, and its practical implications. Jour. Agr. Res.67: 225–264. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brown, M. S. Haploid plants in sorghum. Jour. Hered.34: 163–166. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brown, W. L. Chromosome complements of five species ofPoa with an analysis of variation inPoa pratensis. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 717–723. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. —. The cytogenetics ofPoa pratensis. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.28: 493–522. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Brown, W. V. Cytological studies in theOryseae andZisaneae. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.57: 201–202. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Broyle, W. S. Cytological evidence for the taxonomic position ofSchizachne purpurascens. Madrono7: 129–130. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bryce, J. The economic possibilities of rice grass (Spartina Townsendii). Agr. Prog.13: 72–76. 1936. [Herb. Rev.4: 151–153. 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  57. -.Spartina Townsendii andS. brasitiensis in warm countries. Kew Bull.1936: 21–34. [Herb. Rev.4: 151–153. 1936].

  58. Bulashevich, N. E. [Hybrids ofFestuca pratensis Huds. andLolium perenne L.]. Selek. Semenovod. 1938, no.7: 27–29. [Herb. Abs.9: 9–10. 1939].

  59. Burton, G. W. A cytological study of some species in the genusPaspalum. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 193–197. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  60. —. A cytological study of some species in the tribe Paniceae. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 355–359. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. —. Interspecific hybrids in the genusPaspalum. Jour. Hered.34: 15–23. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  62. —. Hybrids between Napier grass and Cattail millet. Jour. Hered.35: 227–232. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Calder, J. W. A cytological study of some New Zealand species and varieties ofDanthonia. Jour. Linn. Soc. London51: 1–9. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cameron, J. W. Chromosomes of a maize relative,Polytoca macrophylla Benth. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 776–778. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Camus, A. de. Quelques hybrides des genresCistus, Bromus etBrachypodium. Bull. Soc. Bot. France78: 97–102. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  66. —. Hybrides nouveaux du genreBromus. Bull. Soc. Bot. France80: 38–39. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  67. — andJovet, P. Sur lesCalamagrostis lanceolata Roth,C. epigeios Roth et leurs hybrides. Bull. Soc. Bot. France83: 257–265. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Catcheside, D. G. Secondary pairing inBrassica oleracea. Cytologia, Fujii Jubl. Vol.: 366–378. 1937.

  69. Chevalier, A. Sur deux Graminées fourragères interessantes pour les pays tempérés et les pays subtropicaux vivant depuis peu en France. Rev. Appl. Biol.14: 663–673. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Chin, T. C. The cytology of some wild species ofHordeum. Ann. Bot.5: 535–545. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Church, G. L. Meiotic phenomena in certain Gramineae. I. Festuceae, Aveneae, Agrostideae, Chlorideae and Phalarjdeae. Bot. Gaz.87: 608–629. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. —. Meiotic phenomena in certain Gramineae. II. Paniceae and Andropogoneae. Bot. Gaz.88: 63–84. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. —. Cytological studies in the Gramineae. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 12–15. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. —. Cytotaxonomic studies in the Gramineae—Spartina, Andropogon, andPanicum. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 263–271. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. -. tA cytological and morphological approach to the species problem inGlyceria. Am. Jour. Bot.29 Suppl. 1942. [Abs.]

  76. -. A cytological and morphological approach to the species problem inGlyceria. [Unpub.J

  77. -. Cytological studies in western grasses;Puccinellia, Pleuropogon, Fluminea, Orcuttia, Neostaphia, Hierochloe. [Unpub.]

  78. Clarke, S. E. Self-fertilization in timothy. Sci. Agr.7: 409–439. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Clausen, J.et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 520. 1940.

  80. —et al. Experimental taxonomy. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Yearbook42: 91–100. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Cockayne, L. Hybridism in the New Zealand flora. New Phytol.22: 105–127. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. — andAllan, H. H. An annotated list of groups of wild hybrids in the New Zealand flora. Ann. Bot.48: 1–55. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Coleman, O. H. andRobertson, D. W. Preliminary report on inheritance of differential ability of inbred lines of sudan grass to produce HCN. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 24. 1938.

  84. Conner, A. B. andKarper, R. E. The inheritance of seed coat color in certain crosses in grain sorghum. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.15: 338–344. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Cooper, D. C. andBrink, R. A. Collapse of the seed following the mating ofHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale. Genetics29: 370–390. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Corkhill, L. Inheritance of fluorescence in rye-grass. Nature130: 134. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Cornelius, D. R. andJohnston, C. O. Differences in plant type and reaction to rust among several collections ofPanicum virgatum L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 115–124. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Cugnac, A. de. Remarques sur la signification de certaines espèces polymorphes chez les Graminées. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris201: 1040–1042. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  89. —. Sur l’obtention expérimentale d’hybrides interspécifiques dans le genreBromus L., et quelques considérations systématiques qui s’y rapportent. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris203: 115–117. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  90. —. Tendances et possibilités actuelles de la génétique végétale. Ann. Sci. Nat, X, Bot.19: 113–123. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  91. —. xElymopyrum Piettei hybr. nov., hybride expérimental nouveau entre deux genres des Graminées.Elymus riparius Wiegand ×Agropyron caninum Roem. et S. Bull. Hist. Nat. Ardennes33: 14–16. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  92. —. Reconstitution expérimentale d’une Graminée éteinte, par un croisement interspécifique. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris209: 61–63. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  93. —. Conséquences génétiques et phylétiques du croisement de deux Graminées. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris209: 696–698. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  94. —. Sur un cas de dominance inconstante chez un hybride intergénérique de Graminées. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol., Paris130: 877–879. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  95. —. Un cas remarquable de pleiotropie dans une hybridation de Graminées. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol., Paris132: 404–406. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  96. —. Vers la solution expérimentale des problèmes phylétiques par l’étude des croisements interspécifiques. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris211: 143–146. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —. Sur les conséquences systématiques de la dominance et de la récessivité des caractères spécifiques dans les croisements. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris211: 268–270. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  98. —. Réalisation expérimentale d’une variété nouvelle chez une graminée semi-éteinte. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris213: 363–365. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  99. — andBelval, H. Nature du glucide d’un hybride obtenu entre deux genres de Graminées différant par leurs réserves glucidiques. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris208: 377–379. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  100. — andSimonet, M. Les nombres de chromosomes de quelques espèces du genreBromus (Graminées). Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol., Paris135: 728–731. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Darlington, C. D. Recent advances in cytology. Ed. 2. 1937.

  102. —. Misdivision and the genetics of the centromere. Jour. Genet.37: 341–364. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  103. — andThomas, P. T. The breakdown of cell division in aFestuca-Lolium derivative. Ann. Bot.1: 747–761. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  104. ——. Morbid mitosis and the activity of inert chromosomes inSorghum. Proc. Royal Soc., London, B,130: 127–150. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Davies, J. G. The chromosome number inDactylis glomerata (Cocksfoot). Nature119: 236–237. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Derzhavin, A. [The problem of perenniality in agricultural plants]. Selek. Semenovod. 1936:No.5: 9–10. [Herb. Abs.7: 16. 1937].

  107. Dobzhansky, T. Genetics and the origin of species. Ed. 2. 1941.

  108. Duka, S. H. [The trend in breeding cultivated perennial rye]. Zbirn. prisv. Pam. Ljubimenka. Kiev. 1938: 409–413. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.9: 128. 1939].

  109. Earnshaw, F. Experimental taxonomy. V. Cytological studies in sea plantains allied toPlantago maritima L. New Phytol.41: 151–164. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Elliott, C.et al.Pythium root rot of milo. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 797–834. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Engelbert, V. Reproduction in somePoa species. Canad. Jour. Res. C,18: 518–521. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  112. —. The development of twin embryo sacs, embryos, and endosperm inPoa arctica R. Br. Canad. Jour. Res., C,19: 135–144. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Evans, G. Chromosome complements in grasses. Nature118: 841. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Fagerlind, F. Die Terminologie der Apomixis—Prozesse. Hereditas26: 1–22. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Favarov, A. M. andHaenselman, P. S. [Sudan grass breeding]. Semenovodstvo No.3: 20–24. 1933. [Herb. Abs.4: 101. 1934].

  116. Favorskii, N. V. Vergleichende karyologische Untersuchung einiger Arten vonLolium. Planta3: 282–291. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. -. [On the reduction division in the hybrid ofSecale cereale L. ×Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. in connection with the question of its sterility]. Socialistic Grain Farming, Saratov No.1: 115–125. 1935. [Pl. Br. Abs. 5: 323–324. 1935; Herb. Abs.6: 82. 1936].

  118. —. [Reductive division of F1 hybrids of someAegilops withAgropyron intermedium (Preliminary information)]. Socialistic Grain Farming, Saratov6: 95–101. 1936. [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 44. 1937].

    Google Scholar 

  119. Fischer, H. E. Causes of sterility in autotetraploid maize. Genetics26: 151. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Flovik, K. Cytological studies of Arctic grasses. Hereditas24: 265–376. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  121. —. Chromosome numbers and polyploidy within the flora of Spitzbergen. Hereditas26: 430–440. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Fouillade, M. Sur lesAgrostis alba, vulgaris, castellana et leurs hybrides. Bull. Soc. Bot. France79: 789–804. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Franzke, C. J.et al. A study of sorghum with reference to the content of HCN. So. Dak. State College, Tech. Bull. 1. 1939.

  124. Fultz, J. L. Somatic chromosome complements inBouteloua. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 45–55. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Gaiser, L. O. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms. II. Bib. Genet.6: 171–466. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  126. —. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms. III. Genetica12: 161–260. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. —. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms. IV. Bib. Genet.10: 105–250. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Garber, E. A cytological study of the genusSorghum: SubsectionsPara-Sorghum andEu-sorghum. Am. Nat.78: 89–94. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Garber, R. J. andChilton, S. J. P. The occurrence and inheritance of certain leaf “spots” in sudan grass. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 597–606. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Gates, R. R. Nucleoli and related nuclear structures. Bot. Rev.8: 337–409. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Ghimpu, V. [Researches on the chromosomes of species of barley]. Bul. Min. Agr. Domeniilor.1931: 5/6: 3–28. [Pl. Br. Abs.2: 132. 1932].

  132. Gregor, J. W. Experimental delimitation of species. New Phytol.30: 204–217. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. — andSansome, F. W. Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. Part I. Grasses. Jour. Genet.17: 349–364. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  134. ——. Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. II.Phleum pratense L. and the hybridP. pratense ×P. alpinum L. Jour. Genet.22: 373–388. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Griffee, F. Chromosome numbers in species ofHordeum. Minn. Studies Pl. Sci., No.6: 319–331. 1927.

  136. Györfy, B. Untersuchungen über den osmotischen Wert polyploider Pflanzén. Planta32: 15–37. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Hagerup, O. Über Polyploidie in Beziehung zur Klima, Ökologie und Phylogenie. Chromosomenzahlen aus Timbuktu. Hereditas16: 19–40. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  138. —. Studies on the significance of polyploidy. III.Deschampsia andAira. Hereditas25: 185–192. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Håkansson, A. Die Entwicklung des Embryosacks und die Befruchtung beiPoa alpina. Hereditas29: 25–61. 1943. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  140. Harlan, Jack R. A survey of the genetic variability in theBromus carmatus complex. Summary of the dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Univ. Calif. 1944.

  141. Hayes, H. K. andBarker, H. D. The effects of self-fertilization in timothy. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.14: 289–293. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  142. — andClarke, S. E. Selection in self-fertilized lines as a means of improving timothy. Sci. Agr.5: 313–317. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  143. — andSchmid, A. R. Selection in self pollinated lines ofBromus inermis Leyss.,Festuca elatior L. andDactylis glomerata L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 934–943. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Heilborn, O. The mechanics of so-called secondary association between chromosomes. Hereditas22: 167–188. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Heitz, E. Die Ursache der Gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzlicher Nucleolen. Planta12: 775–844. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Hertzsch, W. Art- und Gattungskreuzungen bei Gräsern. Der Züchter10: 261–263. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Hill, H. D. andMyers, W. M. Isolation of diploid and tetraploid clones from mixoploid plants ofLolium perenne L. produced by treatment of germinating seeds with colchicine. Jour. Hered.35: 359–361. 1944.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Hilson, G. R. A note on the inheritance of certain stem characters in sorghum. Agr. Jour. India11: 150–155. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Hirayoshi, I. [Species hybrids between cultivated rice and wild rice (Oryza latifolia) with special reference to their sterility and maturation division. (A preliminary note)]. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 59–60. 1937. [Pl. Br. Abs.8: 42. 1937].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Hitchcock, A. S. Manual of the grasses of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Misc. Publ. 200. 1935.

  151. Hogg, P. G. andAhlgren, H. L. Environmental, breeding, and inheritance studies of hydrocyanic acid inSorghum vulgare var.sudanense. Jour. Agr. Res.67: 195–210. 1943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Holmberg, O. R.Dactylis aschersoniana Gr. ×D. glomerata L. nov. hybr. Bot. Not.1923: 327–330. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Hunter, A. W. S. A karyosystematic investigation in the Gramineae. Canad. Jour. Res., C,11: 213–241. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Huskins, C. L. The origin ofSpartina Townsendii. Genetica12: 531–538. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. —. Origin ofSpartina Townsendii. Nature127: 781. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. —. Polyploidy and mutations. Am. Nat.75: 329–344. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. — andSmith, S. G. A cytological study of the genusSorghum Pers. I. The somatic chromosomes. Jour. Genet.25: 241–249. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  158. ——. A cytological study of the genusSorghum Pers. II. The meiotic chromosomes. Jour. Genet.28: 387–395. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Ivanov, M. A. Experimental production of haploids inNicotiana rustica L. Genetica20: 295–397. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Janaki Ammal, E. K. Cytogenetic analysis ofSaccharutn spontaneum. Chromosome studies in some Indian forms. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.6: 1–8. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  161. -. Chromosome behavior inSaccharum spontaneum ×Sorghum durra hybrids. Proc. 25th Indian Sci. Congr. Calcutta1938: Pt. III: Sect. Bot.: Abst. 21. P. 143. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 387. 1939].

  162. —. Triplopolyploidy inSaccharum spontaneum L. Curr. Sci.8: 74–76. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  163. —. Supernumerary chromosomes in para-sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 210–211. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  164. —. Chromosome diminution in a plant. Nature146: 839–840. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. —. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. Jour. Genet.41: 217–253. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  166. —. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. IV.Saccharum Narenga. Jour. Genet.44: 23–32. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  167. — andSingh, T. S. N. A preliminary note on a newSaccharum ×Sorghum hybrid. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.6: 1105–1106. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Jenkin, T. J. The artificial hybridization of grasses. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H., No.2: 1–18. 1924.

  169. —. Inheritance inLolium perenne L. I. Seedling characters, lethal and yellow-tipped albino. Jour. Genet.19: 391–402. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  170. —. Inheritance inLolium perenne L. II. A second pair of lethal factors. Jour. Genet.19: 403–417. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  171. —. Perennial ryegrass at Aberystwyth. Welsh Jour. Agr.6: 140–165. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  172. —. Inheritance inLolium perenne L. III. Base-colour factors C and R. Jour. Genet.22: 389–394. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  173. —. Self-fertility in perennial rye-grass. (Lolium perenne L.) Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H.,12: 100–119. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  174. —. Self-fertility in Italian rye-grass. (Lolium perenne var.multiflorum). Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H.,12: 120. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  175. —. The inter-fertility ofLolium perenne andL. perenne var.multiflorum. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H.,12: 121–125. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  176. —. Fertility in plants of the genusPhleum. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H.,12: 148–159. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  177. —. Self-fertility inFestuca rubra. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H.,12: 160. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  178. —. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. Initial crosses. Jour. Genet.28: 205–264. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  179. —. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. II.Lolium perenne ×L. temulentum. Jour. Genet.31: 379–411. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  180. —. Natural selection in relation to the grasses. Proc. Royal Soc., London, B,121: 52–56. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  181. -. Evolution in wild populations. Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Congr., Edinburgh1939: 167–168.

  182. — andSethi, B. L. Phalaris arundinacea, Ph. tuberosa, their F1 hybrids and hybrid derivatives. Jour. Genet.26: 1–36. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. — andThomas, P. T. The breeding affinities and cytology ofLolium species. Jour. Bot.76: 10–12. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  184. ——. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. III.Lolium loliaceum ×Lolium rigidum. Jour. Genet.37: 255–286. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Johnson, B. L. andRogler, G. A. A cyto-taxonomic study of an intergeneric hybrid betweenOryzopsis hymenoides andStipa viridula. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 49–56. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Johnson, L. V. P. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. IV. Further crossing results and studies on the F1 hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res., C,16: 417–444. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  187. —et al. Fertility and morphological characters inTriticum-Agropyron hybrids. Genetics24: 91–92. 1939. [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  188. Johnsson, H. Cytological studies in the genusAlopecurus. Acta Univ. Lund.37: No. 3. [Pl. Br. Abs.13: 142. 1943].

  189. Joranson, P. N. The cyto-genetics of hybrids, autotetraploids, and allotetraploids in the grass genusMelica L. Summary of the dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Univ. of Calif., Northern Section. Feb. 1944.

  190. Kadam, B. S. Colour inheritance inPanicum mileaceum. Poona Agr. Coll. Mag.26: 137–139. 1935. [Pl. Br. Abs.6: 107. 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  191. —et al. Consequences of inbreeding in bajri. Jour. Hered.31: 201–207. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Kajanus, B. Zur Genetik des Chlorophylls vonFestuca elatior L. Bot. Not.1921. 131–137. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Karpechenko, G. D. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.48: 1–85. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Karper, R. E. The effect of a single gene upon development in the heterozygote in sorghum. Jour. Hered.21: 187–192. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  195. —. A dominant mutation of frequent recurrence in sorghum. Am. Nat.66: 511–529. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. —. Inheritance of waxy endosperm in sorghum. Jour. Hered.24: 257–262. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  197. —. Maternal inheritance of chlorophyll in sorghum. Tour. Hered.25: 49–54. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  198. — andChisholm, A. F. Chromosome numbers in sorghum. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 369–374. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. — andConner, A. B. Inheritance of chlorophyll characters in sorghum. Genetics16: 291–308. 1931.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. - andQuinby, J. R. Breeding new varieties of Sudan grass. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Prog. Rep. 707. 1940 [Mim.] [Pl. Br. Abs.11: 300. 1941].

  201. — andStephens, J. C. Floral abnormalities in sorghum. Jour. Hered.27: 183–194. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Kattermann, G. Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei Gramineen. Planta12: 19–37. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. —. Über die Bildung polyvalenter Chromosomenverbände bei einigen Gramineen. Planta12: 732–774. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. —. Weitere zytologische Untersuchungen anBriza media mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der durch Verbände aus vier Chromosomen ausgezeichneten Pflanzen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.73: 43–91. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  205. —. Zur Kenntnis der strukturellen Hybriden vonBrisa media. Mitteilung II. Planta27: 669–673. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. —. Kreuzungsversuche beiBrisa media zur Klärung der strukturellen Hybridität. Mitteilung III. Planta27: 674–679. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Kemp, W. B. Natural selection within a plant species, as exemplified in a permanent pasture. Jour. Hered.28: 329–333. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Khizhnyak, V. A. [Form development inTriticum-Agropyron hybrids and the production of perennial wheats]. Selektsijai Semenovodstvo No.12: 20–33. 1936. [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 384–385. 1937].

  209. -. [A cyto-genetical study ofTriticumx Agropyron hybrids and the trend in breeding perennial wheat. Preliminary communication], Trudy Azovo-Cernomor. Selekcent. No.1: 25–30. 1936. [Herb. Abs.7: 206–207. 1937].

  210. -. [Wheat × couch grass amphidiploids, a new valuable forage crop]. Selek. Semenovod. No.11: 56–57. 1937. [Herb. Abs.8: 111. 1938].

  211. -. [Form-genesis in wheat-Agropyron hybrids]. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. Sér. Biol.1938: 597–626. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 295–296. 1939].

  212. Kiellander, C. L. Apornixis beiPoa serotina (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Bot Not.1935: 87–95. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  213. —. On the etnbryological basis of apomixis inPoa palustris L. Svensk. Bot. Tid.31: 425–429. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  214. —. Studies on apospory inPoa pratensis L. Svensk. Bot. Tid.35: 321–322. 1941. [Biol. Abs.16: 2074. 1942].

    Google Scholar 

  215. —. A subhaploidPoa pratensis L. with 18 chromosomes and its progeny. Svensk. Bot. Tid.36: 200–220. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Kishimoto, E. Chromosomenzahlen in den GattungenPanicum undSetaria. I. Chromosomenzahlen einigerSetaria arten. Cytologia9: 23–27. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Knobloch, I. W. Morphological variation and cytology ofBromus inermis. Bull. Torrey Bot. Glub70: 467–472. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. Knoll, J. Künstliche Kreuzung von Gräsern und die Erkennung von Gräserbastarden an der Anatomie ihres Blattquerschnittes. Pflanzenbau5: 250–255. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Knowles, P. F. Improving an annual brome grass,Bromus mollis L., for range purposes. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 584–594. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  220. —. Interspecific hybridizations ofBromus. Genetics29: 128–140. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  221. Kostoff, D. Evolutionary significance of chromosome size and chromosome number in plants. Curr. Sci.8: 306–310. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  222. —. Fertility and chromosome length. Correlations between chromosome length and viability of gametes in autopolyploid plants. Jour. Hered.31: 33–34. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Krasnyuk, A. A. [Secale cereale ×Agropyron cristatum hybrids]. Social. Zern. Hoz. No.1: 106–115. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.6: 81. 1936].

  224. Krishnaswamy, N. Untersuchungen zur Cytologie und Systematik der Gramineen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.60: 1–56. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  225. — andRangaswami Ayyangar, G. N. Chromosome numbers in someSetaria species. Curr. Sci.3: 559–560. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  226. ——. A note on the chromosome numbers of someEleusine species. Curr. Sci.4: 106. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  227. ——. Cytological studies inEleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Ragi—the finger millet. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.57: 297–318. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  228. ——. An autotriploid in the pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,13: 9–23. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  229. ——. Chromosomal alterations induced by X-rays in Bajri (Pennisetum typhoides Stapf. and Hubbard). Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.20: 111–117. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  230. Kuckuck, H. Artkreuzungen bei Gerste (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Der Züchter6: 270–273. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Kuwada, Y. On the number of chromosomes in maize. Bot. Mag. Tokyo39: 227–234. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  232. Lamm, D. Cytological studies on inbred rye. Hereditas22: 217–240. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Lapin, M. M. [On the research of N. V. Cicin withTriticum ×Agropyron hybrids]. Bull. Vsesojuz. Akad. S.-H. Nauk. No. 7: 29–30. 1935. [Herb. Abs.6: 441. 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  234. Law, A. G. andAnderson, K. L. The effect of selection and inbreeding on the growth of big bluestemAndropogon furcatus Muhl. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 931–943. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  235. Lawrence, W. J. C. The secondary association of chromosomes. Cytologia2: 352–384. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  236. Levan, A. Cytological studies inAllium. VI. The chromosome morphology of some diploid species ofAllium. Hereditas20: 289–330. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  237. —. Syncyte formation in the pollen mother cells of haploidPhleum pratense. Hereditas27: 243–252. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  238. —. Studies on the meiotic mechanism of haploid rye. Hereditas28: 177–211. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Levitskii, G. A. [Review of the investigations performed at the Cytological Laboratory of the Institute of Plant Industry in U.S.S.R.]. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br.27: 9–17. 1931. [Eng., pp. 14–17].

    Google Scholar 

  240. —. The morphology of chromosomes. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br.27: 19–174. 1931. [Eng., pp. 103–174].

    Google Scholar 

  241. —. The “Karyotype” in systematics. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br.27: 187–240. 1931. [Eng., pp. 220–240].

    Google Scholar 

  242. — andKuzmina, N. E. Karyological investigations on the genusFestuca. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br.17: 3–36. 1927. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  243. Li, H. W.et al. Cytological and genetical studies of the interspecific crossSetaria italica (L.) Beauv. andS. viridis L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.37: 32–54. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  244. —et al. Genetic studies with foxtail millet,Setaria italica (L.) Beauv. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 426–438. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  245. —et al. Problems in the breeding of millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 963–970. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  246. Li, C. H.et al. Interspecific crosses mSetaria. II. Cytological studies of interspecific hybrids involving: 1,S. faberii andS. italica and 2, a three-way cross, F2 ofS. italica ×S. viridis andS. faberii. Jour. Hered.33: 351–355. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Lindstrom, E. W. andKoos, Katherine. Cytogenetic investigations of a haploid tomato and its diploid and tetraploid progeny. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 398–410. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  248. Linehan, P. A. andMercer, S. P. Fluorescence ofLolium seedlings in ultra-violet light. Nature131: 202–203. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. Litardière, R. de. Sur l’insertion fusoriale des chromosomes somatiques. Bull. Soc. Bot. France70. 1923.

  250. —. Recherches sur lesPoa annua subsp.exilis et subsp.typica. Relations taxonomiques, chorologiques et caryologiques. Rev. Cytol. Cytophysiol. Veg.3: 134–141. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  251. —. Sur les caractères chromosomiques et la systématique desPoa du groupe duP. annua L. Rev. Cytol. Cytophysiol. Veg.4: 81–85. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Longley, A. E. Chromosomes in maize and maize relatives. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 673–682. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  253. —. Chromosomes in grass sorghums. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 317–321. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  254. —. Morphological characters of teosinte chromosomes. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 835–862. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  255. Löve, A. andLöve, D. The significance of differences in the distribution of diploids and polyploids. Hereditas29: 145–163. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  256. Love, R. M. A haploidStipa cernua. Rec. Genet. Soc. Am. No.12: 51. 1944.

  257. -. Additional chromosome numbers and interspecific hybridization in the genusStipa. [Unpub.]

  258. McClintock, B. Chromosome morphology inZea mays. Science69: 629. 1929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  259. —. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf. Mikr. Anat.19: 191–237. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  260. —. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf. Mikr. Anat21: 294–328. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  261. -. The fusion of broken ends of sister half-chromatids following chromatid breakage at meiotic anaphases. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 290. 1938.

  262. McVicar, R. M. andParnell, H. R. The inheritance of plant colour and the extent of natural crossing in foxtail millet. Sci. Agr.22: 80–84. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  263. Mangelsdorf, P. C. andReeves, R. G. The origin of Indian corn and its relatives. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 574. 1939.

  264. Marchal, E. Recherches sur les variations numériques des chromosomes dans la série végétale. Mem. Acad. Royal Belg. II.4: 1–108. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Marcy, D. E. Inheritance of resistance to the loose and covered smuts of sorghum. I. Dwarf Yellow Milo hybrids. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club64: 209–228. 1937. II. Feterita hybrids. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club64: 245–267. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. Martin, J. H. Sorghum improvement. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1936: 523–560. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Matsuura, K. andSuto, T. Contributions to the idiogram study in phanerogamous plants. Hokkaido Imp. Univ., Jour. Fac. Sci. V.5: 33–75. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  268. Maude, P. F. The Merton catalogue. A list of the chromosome numerals of species of British flowering plants. New Phytol.38: 1–31. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  269. —. Chromosome numbers in some British plants. New Phytol.39: 17–32. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  270. Miège, J. Contribution à l’étude des Phalaridées. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. No. 30: 223–245. 1939.

  271. Mikharlovskii, V. [A new cultivated plant—perennial sorghum]. Selek. Semenovodstvo. No.7: 39–40. 1939. [Pl. Br. Abs.10: 113. 1940].

  272. Moffett, A. A. Note on the cytology of Rhodes grass. Rhodesia Agr. Jour.41: 11–13. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  273. Morinaga, T. andFukushima, E. Cytogenetical studies onOryza sativa L. I. Studies on the haploid plant ofOryza sativa L. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 73–106. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  274. Moriya, A. Contributions to the cytology of genusSaccharum. I. Observations on the F1 progeny of sugar cane-sorghum hybrids. Cytologia11: 117–135. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Mowery, M. Development of the pollen grain and the embryo sac ofAgropyron repens. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club56: 319–324. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  276. Müntzing, A. Quadrivalent formation and aneuploidy inDactylis glomerata. Bot. Not.1933: 198–205. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  277. —. Hybrid incompatibility and the origin of polyploidy. Hereditas18: 33–55. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  278. —. Apomictic and sexual seed formation inPoa. Hereditas17: 131–154. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  279. —. Cytogenetic studies on hybrids between twoPhleum species. Hereditas20: 103–136. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  280. —. The evolutionary significance of autcpolyploidy. Hereditas21: 263–378. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  281. -. Polyploidy from twin seedlings. Cytologia, Fuj. Jub. Vol. 211–227. 1937.

  282. —. The effects of chromosomal variation inDactylis. Hereditas23: 113–235. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  283. —. Note on heteroploid twin plants from eleven genera. Hereditas28: 487–491. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  284. —. Further studies on apomixis and sexuality inPoa. Hereditas26: 115–190. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  285. —. [Polyploidy and plant breeding]. Sverig Utsädesfören Tidskr.51: 307–316. 1941. [Pl. Br. Abs.13: 124–125. 1943].

    Google Scholar 

  286. —. Characteristics of two haploid twins inDactylis glomerata. Hereditas29: 134–140. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  287. — andLevan, A. [Report on the activity of the chromosome division of the Swedish Seed Association during the period Oct. 1, 1935-Sept. 30, 1940]. Sverig. Utsädesfören Tidskr.51: 83–93. 1941. [Pl. Br. Abs.13: 123–124. 1943].

    Google Scholar 

  288. — andPrakken, R. The mode of chromosome pairing inPhleum twins with 63 chromosomes and its cytogenetic consequences. Hereditas26: 463–501. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Murphy, R. P. Methods of breedingAgropyron cristatum (L.) Beauv. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 553–565. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  290. Myers, W. M. Colchicine induced tetraploidy in perennial ryegrass,Lolium perenne L. Jour. Hered.30: 499–504. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  291. —. Tetrasomic inheritance inDactylis glomerata. Genetics25: 126. 1940 [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  292. —. Variations in chromosomal behavior during meiosis among plants ofLolium perenne L. Cytologia11: 388–406. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  293. —. Meiotic behavior ofPhleum pratense, Phleum subulotum, and their F1 hybrid. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 649–659. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  294. —. Genetical consequences of the chromosomal behavior in orchard grass,Dactylis glomerata L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 893–900. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  295. -. Natural and induced polyploidy in relation to breeding forage grasses. Presented before the Meetings of the Am. Soc. Agron., Nov. 12–14, 1941. Washington, D. C.

  296. —. Heritable variations in seed set under bag among plants of orchard grass,Dactylis glomerata L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 1042–1051. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  297. —. The effects of inbreeding upon meiotic irregularity in plants ofDactylis glomerata. Genetics28: 83–84. 1943 [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  298. —. Analysis of variance and covariance of chromosomal association and behavior during meiosis in clones ofDactylis glomerata. Bot., Gaz.104: 541–552. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  299. —. Second generation progeny tests of the method of reproduction in Kentucky bluegrass,Poa pratensis L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 413–419. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  300. -. Increased meiotic irregularity and decreased fertility accompanying inbreeding inDactylis glomerata. Presented before the meetings of the Am. Soc. Agron., Nov. 10–12, 1943, Cincinnati, Ohio.

  301. —. Cytological studies of a triploid perennial ryegrass and its progeny. Jour. Hered.35: 17–23. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  302. —. The randomness of chromosome distribution at anaphase I in autotriploidLolium perenne L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club71: 144–151. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  303. —. Cytological and genetic analysis of chromosomal association and behavior during meiosis in hexaploid timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Jour. Agr. Res.68: 21–33. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  304. -. Meiosis in autotetraploidLolium perenne L. in relation to chromosomal behavior in autopolyploids. Bot. Gaz. [In Press].

  305. -. [Unpub.] U. S. Reg. Past. Res. Lab.

  306. — andCholton, S. J. P. Correlated studies of winterhardiness and rust reaction of parents and inbred progenies of orchard grass and timothy. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 215–220. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  307. - and -. Inheritance of rust resistance in timothy. [Unpub.]

  308. — andHill, Helen D. The association and behavior of chromosomes in autotetraploid grasses. Genetics25: 129. 1940. [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  309. ——. Studies of chromosomal association and behavior and the occurrence of aneuploidy in autotetraploid grass species, orchard grass, tall oat grass, and crested wheatgrass. Bot. Gaz.102: 236–255. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  310. ——. Variations in meiotic behavior among plants of the autotetraploidDactylis glomerata. Genetics26: 162. 1941. [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  311. ——. Variations in chromosomal association and behavior during meiosis among plants from open-pollinated populations ofDactylis glomerata. Bot. Gaz.104: 171–177. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  312. ——. Increased meiotic irregularity accompanying inbreeding inDactylis glomerata L. Genetics28: 383–397. 1943.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  313. - and -. [Unpub.] U. S. Reg. Past. Res. Lab.

  314. Nakajima, G. On the chromosome number in some agricultural plants. Jap. Jour. Genet.5: 172–176. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  315. —. The chromosome numbers in cultivated and wild angiosperms. Bot. Mag. Tokyo45: 7–11. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  316. —. Chromosome numbers in some angiosperms. Jap. Jour. Genet.9: 1–5. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  317. —. Chromosome numbers in some crops and wild angiosperms. Jap. Jour. Genet.12: 211–218. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  318. Nandi, H. K. The chromosome homology, secondary association and origin of cultivated rice. Jour. Genet.33: 315–336. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  319. —. Interspecific hybridization inOrysa. I. Cyto-genetical evidence of the hybrid origin ofOryza minuta Presl. Trans. Bose Res. Inst.11: 99–121. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  320. Nannfeldt, J. A. (Appeal). Bot. Not.1936: 158. 1936. [Herb. Abs.7: 9. 1937].

    Google Scholar 

  321. —. The chromosome numbers ofPoo sect.Ochlopoa A. and Gr. and their taxonomical significance. Bot. Not.1937: 238–254. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  322. —. On the chromosome number ofPhippsia algida (Sol. ap. Phipps). R. Br. Bot. Not.1937: 255–257. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  323. Nebel, B. R. Mechanism of polyploldy through colchicine. Nature140: 1101. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  324. — andRuttle, M. L. The cytological and genetical significance of colchicine. Jour. Hered.29: 3–9. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  325. Nemlienko, N. E. [Results of researches with wheat-Agropyron hybrids]. Selek. Semenovod.1939: 16–19. [Herb. Abs.10: 17. 1940].

  326. Newell, L. C. andKeim, F. D. Field performance of bromegrass strains from different regional seed sources. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 420–434. 1943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  327. Nielsen, E. L. Grass studies. III. Additional somatic chromosome complements. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 366–372. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  328. —. Grass studies. V. Observations on proliferation. Bot. Gaz.103: 177–181. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  329. —. Analysis of variation inPanicum virgatum. Jour. Agr. Res.69: 327–353. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  330. -. The origin of twins and triplets inPoa pratensis. [Unpub.]

  331. — andHumphrey, L. M. Grass studies. I. Chromosome numbers in certain members of the tribes Festuceae, Hordeae, Aveneae, Agrostideae, Chlorideae, Phalarideae and Tripsaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 276–279. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  332. - andSmith, D. C. Breeding and cytology of Kentucky bluegrass. Embryology of selected plants in relation, to breeding behavior of their progenies. Presented before the meetings of the Am. Soc. Agron., Nov. 10–12, 1943.

  333. Nilsson, F.Lolium multiflorum Lam. ♀ ×Festuca gigantea Vill. ♂ Ein Neuer Gattungsbastard. Bot. Not.1930: 81–90. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  334. —. Einige Resultate von Isolations und Bastardierungsversuchen mitLolium multiflorum Lam. undLolium perenne L. Bot. Not.1930: 161–200. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  335. —. Die HybrideBromus hordeaceus L. ×Bromus mollis L. experimentell dargestellt. Bot. Not.1931: 1–9. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  336. —. Ein spontaner Bastard zwischenFestuca rubra undLolium perenne. Hereditas18: 1–15. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  337. —. Självoch Korsbefruktning i Rödsvingel (Festuca rubra L.), Ängsgröe (Poa pratensis L.) och Ängskavle (Alopecurus pratensis L.). Bot. Not.1933: 206–230. 1933. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  338. —. Self-fertility in the genusLolium. Bot. Not.1933: 563–576. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  339. —. Studies in fertility and inbreeding in some herbage grasses. Hereditas19: 1–162. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  340. —. Amphipolyploidy in the hybridFestuca arundinacea Xgigantea. Hereditas20: 181–198. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  341. —. Frösättningen hos Ängsgröe,Poa pratensis. Bot. Not.1937: 85–109. 1937. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  342. —. Undersökningar över hybridenBrotnus hordeaceus ×Bromus mollis och des avkomma. Bot. Not.1937: 463–486. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  343. —. The hybridFestuca arundinaceo ×F. pratensis and some of its derivatives. Bot. Not.1939: 33–50. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  344. Nilsson-Leissner, G. A preliminary inbreeding experiment in red fescue (Festuca rubra). Hereditas18: 115–121. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  345. Nissen, O. Genetische Untersuchungen inAlopecurus pratensis L. I. Ausspaltungen von Albinos. Bot. Not.1933: 555–562. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  346. —. Genetische Untersuchungen inAlopecurus pratensis L. 2. Ein neuer komplementärer Chlorophyllfaktor. Bot. Not.1936: 127–129. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  347. —. [The size of the stomata in twin plants with different chromosome numbers]. Bot. Not.1937: 28–34. 1937. [Pl. Br. Abs.8: 133. 1937].

    Google Scholar 

  348. Nordenskiöld, Hedda. Intra and interspecific hybrids ofPhleum pratense andP. alpinum. Hereditas23: 304–316. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  349. —. Studies on a haploid rye plant. Hereditas25: 204–210. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  350. —. Cytological studies in triploidPhleum. Bot. Not.1941: 12–32. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  351. Olah, L. Interspecific hybrids in the genusPhleum. Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Congr. Edinburgh, Aug. 23–30, 1939: 228. 1941.

  352. Olmsted, C. E. Growth and development in range grasses. IV. Photoperiodic responses in twelve geographic strains of side-oats grama. Bot. Gaz.106: 46–74. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  353. Östergren, G. Cytology ofAgropyron junceum, A. repens and their spontaneous hybrids. Hereditas26: 305–316. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  354. —. On the morphology ofAgropyron junceum (L.) P.B.,A. repens (L.) P.B. and their spontaneous hybrids. Bot. Not.1940: 133–143. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  355. —. A hybrid betweenTriticum turgidum andAgropyron junceum. Hereditas26: 395–398. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  356. —. Chromosome numbers inAnthoxanthum. Hereditas28: 242–243. 1942. [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  357. Pardi, I. [The chromosome numbers ofAgropyron junceum P.B. of the Atlantic and the Mediterranean coasts]. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital.44: 645–651. 1938. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 74. 1939].

    Google Scholar 

  358. Parris, G. K. andRipperton, J. C. Reactions of Napier grass, Merker grass, and their crosses toHelminthosporium eye spot. Phytopath.31: 855. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  359. Parthasarathy, N. Cytological studies inOryzcae andPhalarideae. II. Further studies inOryza. Cytologia9: 307–318. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  360. —. Cytogenetical studies inOryzeae andPhalarideae. III. Cytological studies inPhalarideae. Ann. Bot.3: 43–76. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  361. Patel, Z. H. Occurrence of Xenia in pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Stapf and Hubbard). Curr. Sci.8: 363–364. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  362. -. A sugary mutant in pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum). Proc. 28th Indian Sci. Congr. Benares:Part III:Sec. Agr. P. 258. 1941. [Pl. Br. Abs.12: 153. 1942].

  363. Pathak, G. N. Studies in the cytology of the cereals. Jour. Genet.39: 437–467. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  364. Perak, J. T. Numero de cromosomas de algunas espécies deHordeum espontáneas en Argentina. An. Inst. Fitotec. Santa Catalina3: 7–11. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  365. Peto, F. H. Chromosome numbers in theAgropyrons. Nature124: 181–182. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  366. —. Cytological studies in the genusAgropyron. Canad. Jour. Res.3: 428–448. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  367. —. The cytology of certain intergeneric hybrids betweenFestuca andLoljum. Jour. Genet.28: 113–156. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  368. —. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. II. Cytology of the male parents and F1 generation. Canad. Jour. Res., C,14: 203–214. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  369. —. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. V. Doubling the chromosome numbers inT. vulgare and F1 ofT. vulgare ×A. glaucum by temperature treatments. Canad. Jour. Res., C,16: 516–529. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  370. — andBoyes, J. W. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. VI. Induced fertility in Vernal emmer × A.glaucum. Canad. Jour. Res., C,18: 230–239. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  371. — andYoung, G. A. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. VII. New fertile amphidiploids. Canad. Jour. Res., C,20: 123–129. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  372. Poddubnaja-Arnoldi, V. On hybridization betweenTriticum andElymus. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.24: 378–381. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  373. Popowa, G. I. Cytologische Untersuchungen eines neuen BastardesTriticum Timopheevi ×Agropyron elongatum. Cytologia9: 495–498. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  374. Powers, LeRoy, andClark, Andrew. Failure of chromosome pairing as evidence of secondary diploidy inZea mays. Jour. Genet.35: 301–313. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  375. Quinby, J. R. andKarper, R. E. Inheritance of mature plant characters in sorghum induced by radiation. Jour. Hered.33: 323–327. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  376. Quincke, F. L. Interspecific and intergeneric crosses withHordeum. Canad. Jour. Res., C,18: 372–373. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  377. Ramanujam, S. Cytogenetical studies in theOryzeae. I. Chromosome studies in theOryzeae. Ann. Bot.2: 107–125. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  378. Rancken, G. Zytologische Untersuchungen an einigen wirtschaftlich wertvollen Wiesengräsern, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von strukturellen Abweichungen in dem Chromosomenkomplement. Acta. Agral. Fenn. No.29: 1–96. 1934.

  379. Randolph, L. F. Some effects of high temperature on polyploidy and other variations in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 222–229. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  380. —. An evaluation of induced polyploidy as a method of breeding crop plants. Am. Nat.75: 347–365. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  381. —. Genetic characteristics of the B chromosomes in maize. Genetics26: 608–631. 1941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  382. Rangasami, K. On the cytology ofPennisetum typhoideum Rich. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.14: 125–131. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  383. Rangaswami Ayyangar, G. N. Recent work on the genetics of millets in India. Madras Agr. Jour.22: 16–26. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  384. —. Linkage between the blackish purple of sheath and glume, and nucellar brown in sorghum. Curr. Sci.5: 200–201. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  385. —. Juiciness and sweetness in sorghum stalks. Madras Agr. Jour.23: 350–352. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  386. —. Studies in sorghum. Jour. Madras Univ.11: 131–143. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  387. —. The description of crop plant characters and their ranges of variation. IV. Variability of Indian sorghum (Jowar). Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.12: 528–563. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  388. — andAchyutha Wariar, U. Inheritance of glume length in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.), the finger millet. Madras Agr. Jour.24: 132–134. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  389. ——. An African Ragi,Eleusine coracana Gaertn. —the finger millet with a violet purple color. Madras Agr. Jour.24: 363–365. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  390. ——. Albinism inEleusine indica. Curr. Sci.5: 301. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  391. —et al. Inheritance of characters in Ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.), the finger millet. Part VIII. Earhead color factors. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 1080–1084. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  392. - andHariharan, P. V. Pennisetum typhoides (Stapf and Hubbard) andPennisetum leonis (Stapf and Hubbard). Madras Agr. Jour.23: 1935.

  393. ——. Chlorophyll deficiencies inPennisetum typhoides (Stapf and Hubbard). The pearl millet. Madras Agr. Jour.23: 394–397. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  394. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of yellow colored anthers in the Italian millet—Setariaitalica Beauv. Madras Agr. Jour.24: 151–152. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  395. ——. Bristled cumbu (pearl millet). Madras Agr. Jour.24: 235–237. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  396. ——. Inheritance of height of plants in the Italian millet—Setaria italica (Beauv.). Madras Agr. Jour.25: 141–143. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  397. —et al. Basal branching in the earheads of the pearl millet—Pennisteum typhoides Stapf and Hubbard. Curr. Sci.4: 237–238. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  398. — andKrishna Rao, P. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part I. Purple pigmentation. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 434–444. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  399. ——. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part V. Albinism. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 569–576. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  400. ——. Studies in the millet,Panicum miliaceum Linn. Madras Agr. Jour.26: 195–206. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  401. —et al. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part II. Grain color factors and their relation to plant purple pigmentation. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 538–553. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  402. —et al. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part VI. Earhead shapes. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 254–265. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  403. —et al. Inheritance of characters in Ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.), the finger millet. Part VII. Fist-like earheads. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 1072–1079. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  404. —et al. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part IV. Depth of green in the pericarp. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 563–568. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  405. — andKrishnaswamy, N. The inheritance of characters in ragi,Eleusine coracana (Gaertn.). Part III. Sterility. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 554–562. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  406. — andKunhikoran Nambiar, A. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. VIII. A brownish purple mutant. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.6: 481–483. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  407. ——. The relationship between the mechanical tissue brown factor and the factor for juiciness of stalk in sorghum. Madras Agr. Jour.25: 157–158. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  408. ——. The coupling phase of the linkage relationship between “leaf-sheath-glume” and “dry anther-grain” colours in sorghum. Curr. Sci.7: 17–19. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  409. ——. A new factor determining the tint of red and yellow grain colours in sorghum. Madras Agr. Jour.26: 465–468. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  410. ——. Genic differences governing the distribution of stigmatic feathers in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 214–216. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  411. ——. Lethal green seedlings in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 417–418. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  412. ——. The inheritance of the manifestation of purple colour at the pulvinar regions in the panicles of sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 80–82. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  413. ——. The inheritance of depth of green colour in the leaves of sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 492–493. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  414. — andKunhi Krishnan Nambiar, K. A “tiny” sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,8: 309–316. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  415. — andNarayanan, T. R. The inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.) the Italian millet. Part. I. Grain colours. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 586–608. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  416. ——. Inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.). Part II. Anther colours. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 59–61. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  417. ——. The inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.), the Italian millet. Part VI. Albinism. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 559–560. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  418. —et al. The inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.)—the Italian millet. Part III. Bristles. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 207–218. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  419. —et al. The inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.), the Italian millet. Part IV. Spikelet-tipped bristles. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 552–556. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  420. —et al. Inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.), the Italian millet. Part VII. Plant purple pigmentation. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 176–194. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  421. — andPanduranga Rao, V. Further data on the homology of stigmas and awns. Curr. Sci.4: 176–177. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  422. ——. Dummy pollen. Curr. Sci.4: 315. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  423. ——.Sorghum papyrascens Stapf. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.15: 139–142. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  424. —et al. The inheritance of some characters in crosses with the sorghums, Milo and Kafir. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.2: 508–522. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  425. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. VII. Ligule and auricle. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 539–541. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  426. —et al. The occurrence and inheritance of purple blotched grains in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 213–214. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  427. —et al. The occurrence and inheritance of waxy bloom in sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,5: 4–15. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  428. —et al. Deciduous sessile spikelets in sorghum. Curr. Sci.5: 299–300. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  429. —et al. The occurrence and inheritance of purple-tipped grains in sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,8: 396–398. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  430. —et al. Green and bluish-green seedlings in sorghum. Curr. Sci.6: 556–557. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  431. —et al. The occurrence and inheritance of purple anthers in sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,8: 317–323. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  432. —et al. The inheritance of deciduousness of the pedicelled spikelets in sorghum. Curr. Sci.5: 538–539. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  433. — andPonnaiya, B. W. X. The occurrence and inheritance of earheads with empty anther sacs in sorghum. Curr. Sci.5: 390. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  434. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of purple pigment on the glumes of sorghum close on emergence from the boot. Curr. Sci.5: 590. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  435. ——. Studies inSorghum sudanense Stapf.—The Sudan grass. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,10: 237–254. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  436. ——. Hairiness of the mid-rib edges in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 115–116. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  437. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of panicletip sterility in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 116–117. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  438. ——. Cleistogamy and its inheritance in sorghum. Curr. Sci.8: 418–419. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  439. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of a bloomless sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 408–409. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  440. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of shoots from the axils of panicle branches inSorghum sudanense. Curr. Sci.10: 409–410. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  441. ——. Two new genes conditioning the tint of the colour on the glumes of sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 410–411. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  442. ——. Wavy peduncle—the basic cause of goosenecking in sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 528–530. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  443. ——. Sorghums with felty glumes. Curr. Sci.10: 533–534. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  444. ——. Studies inPara-sorghum Snowden—the group with bearded nodes. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,14: 17–24. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  445. ——. Studies inSorghum halepense (Linn.) Pers.—the Johnson grass. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,13: 157–162. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  446. —et al. Sorghum—purple pigment in the late-seedling stage. Curr. Sci.6: 612–613. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  447. — andSankara Ayyar, M. A. Inheritance of characters in sorghum. I. Chlorophyll deficiencies. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 266–270. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  448. ——. Linkage between a panicle factor and the pearly-chalky mesocarp factor (Zz) in sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,8: 100–107. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  449. ——. The inheritance and linkage affinities of the yellow-coloured midrib in sorghum. Curr. Sci.9: 542–543. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  450. —et al. The inheritance of height cum duration in sorghum. Madras Agr. Jour.25: 107–118. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  451. —et al. The inheritance of purple pigment at the base of anthers in sorghum. Curr. Sci.10: 491–492. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  452. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. V. Linkage between sheath-glume and dry anther—grain colours. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 90–95. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  453. —et al. Linkage between purple leaf-sheath colour and juiciness of stalk in sorghum. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,5: 1–3. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  454. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. IX. Dimpled grain. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.6: 938–945. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  455. —et al. Mendelian segregations for juiciness and sweetness in sorghum stalks. Madras Agr. Jour.24: 247–248. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  456. — andSeshadri Sarma, P. The inheritance of characters inSetaria italica (Beauv.), the Italian millet. Part V. A type of lax earhead. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 557–558. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  457. — andSrinivasa Rao, U. L. Studies in the Barnyard millet—Echinochloa colona var.jrumentacea, C. E. C. Fischer. Madras Agr. Jour.29: 3–12. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  458. — andVenkataramana Reddy, T. Chlorophyll deficiencies in sorghum—Xantha and patchy albino. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B,5: 183–185. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  459. ——. The inheritance of basal feathered stigmas (and basal barbed subules) in sorghum. Madras Agr. Jour.26: 123–126. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  460. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of hairiness of leaf tip in sorghum. Madras Agr. Jour.27: 210–214. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  461. ——. The inheritance of a new type of purple pigmentation manifesting on the glumes at anthesis. Curr. Sci.9: 228–229. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  462. ——. The occurrence and inheritance of purple hairs on the spikelets of sorghum. Curr. Sci.9: 229. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  463. ——. The inheritance of hairy styles (and barbed columns of awns) in sorghum. Curr. Sci.9: 282–283. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  464. ——. Sorghum awns of inconstant length and their inheritance. Curr. Sci.9: 283–284. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  465. ——. Sorghum spikelet-awn relationships and inheritance. Madras Agr. Jour.28: 306–308. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  466. ——. Seedling-adult colour relationships and inheritance in sorghum. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.12: 341–363. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  467. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. II. Purple pigmentation on leaf-sheath and glume. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 589–594. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  468. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. III. Grain colours: red, yellow and white. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 594–604. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  469. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. VI. Pearly and chalky grains. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 96–99. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  470. —et al. Inheritance of characters in sorghum—the great millet. IV. Brown grains. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 81–89. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  471. Rau, N. S. On the chromosome numbers of some cultivated plants of South India. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.8: 126–128. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  472. Reed, G. M. A new method of production and detecting sorghum hybrids. Jour. Hered.21: 133–144. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  473. Rhoades, M. M. Studies of a telocentric chromosome in maize with reference to the stability of its centromere. Genetics25: 483–520. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  474. — andMcClintock, B. The cytogenetics of maize. Bot. Rev.1: 292–325. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  475. Richaria, R. H. andKotwal, J. P. Chromosome number in bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus). Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.10: 1033. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  476. Robertson, J. H. andWeaver, L. A new tetraploid wheatgrass from Nevada. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club69: 434–437. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  477. Rogler, G. A. Response of geographical strains of grasses to low temperatures. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.35: 547–559. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  478. Rohweder, H. Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Anpassung der Angiospermen an die Kalkgebiete Schleswig-Holsteins. Beih. Bot. Centralb.54a: 507–519. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  479. Rozanova, M. A. Significance of amphidiploidy and autopolyploidy for problems of phylogeny. [Abs.] “Russian contributions to the 1939 Genetics Congress. A. Plant Genetics”. Am. Doc. Inst., Doc. 1563.

  480. Rudorf, W. Über eine Zwerg—compactum—Mutation beiFestuca pratensis L. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.60: 132–147. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  481. Rumke, C. L.Saccharum-Erianthus Bastaarden. Arch. Suikerind. Ned.-Ind. pp. 211–263. 1934.

  482. Rutland, J. P. The Merton catalogue. A list of chromosome numbers of British plants. Supplement No. 1. New Phytol.40: 210–214. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  483. Saez, F. A. andNunez, O. La citologia deSorghum almum Parodi Nueva especie con 40 cromosomas. La Plata Univ. Nac. Mus. Notas Bot8: 333–348. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  484. Saint Yves, A.Festuca hybrides. Leningrad Botonichesbi i Sad.28: 592–608. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  485. Sakai, K. [Chromosome studies inOrysa sativa L. I. The secondary association of the meiotic chromosomes]. Jap. Jour. Genet.11: 145–156. 1935. [Pl. Br. Abs.6: 171. 1936].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  486. Salomon, E. S.Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf tetraploide obtenido por colchicina. An. Inst. Fitotec. Santa Catalina2: 13–16. 1940. [Pl. Br. Abs.14: 136. 1944].

    Google Scholar 

  487. Sapegin, A. A. [Cytological investigation ofTriticum ×Agropyron hybrids]. Jour. Bot. U.R.S.S.20: 119–125. 1935. [Pl. Br. Abs.6: 43. 1936].

    Google Scholar 

  488. Satina, Sophia andBlakeslee, A. F. Chromosome behavior in triploids ofDatura stramonium. I. The male gametophyte. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 518–527. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  489. ——. Chromosome behavior in triploidDatura. II. The female gametophyte. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 621–627. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  490. Saura, F. Cariologia de algunas especies del géneroPaspalum. Inst. Genét., Fac. Agron. Y Vet., Univ. B. Aires2: 41–48. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  491. —. Cariologia de Gramíneas: génerosPaspalum, Stipa, Poa, Andropogon yPhalaris. Rev. Fac. Agron. B. Aires10: 344–353. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  492. Savchenko, P. F. Experimental modification of the chromosomes of a phyletically primitive type. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.27: 1024–1027. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  493. Schlösser, L. A. Frosthärte und Polyploidie. Der Züchter8: 75–80. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  494. —. Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der Ausnutzung von Polyploidie in der Pflanzenzucht. Forschungsdienst3: 69–82. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  495. Schultz, H. K. A study of methods of breeding orchard grass,Dactylis glomerata L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 546–558. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  496. Shalygin, I. N. Production of tetraploids inLolium by treating germinating seeds with colchicine. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.30: 527–529. 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  497. Sharp, L. W. Introduction to cytology. Ed. 3. 1934.

  498. Sieglinger, J. B. Seed-color inheritance in certain grain-sorghum crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 53–64. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  499. —. Inheritance of seed color in crosses of brown-seeded and white-seeded sorghums. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 663–667. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  500. —. A dwarf mutation in kafir. Jour. Hered.24: 336–338. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  501. —et al. Inheritance of awn development in sorghums. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 663–668. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  502. Simonet, M. Sur la valeur taxinomique de l’Agropyrumacutum Roehm. et S. Contrôle cytologique. Bull. Soc. Bot. France81: 801–814. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  503. —. Contributions à l’étude cytologique et génétique des quelquesAgropyrum. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris201: 1210–1212. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  504. —. Observations sur quelques espèces et hybrides d’Agropyrum. I. Revision de l’Agropyrum junceum (L.) P. B. et de l’Agropyrum (Host.) P. B. d’après l’étude cytologique. Bull. Soc. Bot. France82: 624–632. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  505. — andGuinochet, M. Observations sur quelques espèces et hybrides d’Agropyrum. II. Sur la répartition géographique des races caryologiques de l’Agropyrum junceum (L.) P. B. Bull. Soc. Bot. France85: 175–179. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  506. Singh, T. S. N. Chromosome number in sugar cane ×Sorghum hybrids. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 1050. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  507. Sipkov, T. P. [A contribution to the cytology ofAgropyrum-Triticum hybrids]. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Br. II.9: 357–360. 1935 (1936). [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 45. 1937].

    Google Scholar 

  508. Skirm, G. W. Bivalent pairing in an induced tetraploid ofTradescantia. Genetics27: 635–640. 1942.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  509. Skovsted, A. Cytological studies in twin plants. Comp. Rend. Lab. Carlsberg. Série Physiol.22: 427–446. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  510. Smith, D. C. Intergeneric hybridization of cereals and other grasses. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 33–47. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  511. —. Intergeneric hybridization ofTriticum and other grasses, principallyAgropyron. Jour. Hered.34: 219–224. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  512. Sokolovskaya, A. P. A caryo-geographical study of the genusAgrostis. Cytologia8: 452–467. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  513. — andStrelkova, O. S. Polyploidy in the high mountain regions of Pamir and Altai. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.21: 68–71. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  514. Sprague, V. G. andMyers, W. M. Differential response to clipping and chromosomal reduplication inLolium perenne. Paper presented at Am. Soc. Agron. Meetings, Chicago, Ill. 1940.

  515. - and -. Differential yield responses from chromosome doubling in clones ofLolium perenne. [Unpub.]

  516. Sparrow, A. H.et al. Comparative cytology of sterile intra and fertile intervarietal tetraploids ofAntirrhinum majus L. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 711–715. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  517. Stählin, A. Morphologische und zytologische Untersuchungen an Gramineen. Pflanzenbau1: 330–398. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  518. Stapledon, R. G. Cocksfoot grass (Dactylis glomerata L.): Ecotypes in relation to the biotic factor. Jour. Ecol.16: 71–104. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  519. —. Nationality trials with cocksfoot and observations on the general bearing of the relationship of stem shoots to leaf shoots. Welsh Jour. Agr.6: 130–140. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  520. -. Self and cross-fertility and vigor in cocksfoot grass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H., No. 12: 161–180. 1931.

  521. - andDavies, W. Experiments to test the yield and other properties of various species and strains of herbage plants under different methods of management. Welsh Pl. Br. Sta., Bull., H., No. 10. 1930.

  522. Stebbins, G. L., Jr. The significance of polyploidy in plant evolution. Am. Nat.74: 54–65. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  523. —. Apomixis in the angiosperms. Bot. Rev.7: 507–542. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  524. —. Polyploid complexes in relation to ecology and the history of floras. Am. Nat.76: 36–45. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  525. -. Additional chromosome numbers of grass species. [Unpub.]

  526. — andLove, R. M. A cytological study of California forage grasses. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 371–382. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  527. — andTobgy, H. A. The cytogenetics of hybrids inBromus. I. Hybrids within the sectionCeratochloa. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 1–11. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  528. —et al. The cytogenetics of hybrids inBromus. II.Bromus carinatus andBromus Arizonicus. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., IV,25: 307–322. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  529. Stenar, Helge. Parthenogenesis in der GattungCalamagrostis. Embryobildung beiCalamagrostis obtusata Trin. undCalamagrostis purpurea Trin. Ark. Bot.25A: 1–8. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  530. Stephens, J. C. Male sterility in sorghum: its possible utilization in production of hybrid seed. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 690–696. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  531. —. Linkage of green-striped-2 in sorghum. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.36: 469–470. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  532. — andQuinby, J. R. Linkage of the Q B Gs group in sorghum. Jour. Agr. Res.57: 747–757. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  533. ——. The D Rs P linkage group in sorghum. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 725–730. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  534. Stolze, K. V. Die Chromosomenzahlen der hauptsächlichsten Getreidearten nebst allgemeinen Betrachtungen über Chromosomen, Chromosomenzahl und Chromosomengrösse im Pflanzenreich. Bib. Genet.8: 1–71. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  535. Strelkova, O. Polyploidy and geographo-systematic groups in the genusAlopecurus L. Cytologia8: 468–480. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  536. Sullivan, J. T. Further comparisons of plants with different chromosome numbers in respect to chemical composition. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.36: 537–543. 1944.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  537. — andMyers, W. M. Chemical composition of diploid and tetraploidLolium perenne L. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 869–871. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  538. Swanson, A. F. andParker, J. H. Inheritance of smut resistance and juiciness of stalk in the sorghum cross, Red Amber × feterita. Jour. Hered.22: 51–56. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  539. Sylven, N. Nya svenska fyndlokaler förDactylis Aschersoniana Graebn. och dess hybrid medD. glomerata L. Bot. Not.1934: 339–342. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  540. —.Festuca arundinacea Shreb. ×gigantea (L.) Vill. funnen i Skåne. Bot. Not.1934: 494. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  541. -. Die Bedeutung der Oekotypen—Bildung für die Weide- und Wiesenpflanzenzüchtung. IV Int. Grassland Cong. Rep. pp. 40–45. 1937. [Eng. sum.]

  542. Tanji, Sh. Chromosome numbers of wild barley. Bot. Mag. Tokyo39: 55–57. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  543. Thomas, P. T. Genotypic control of chromosome size. Nature138: 402. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  544. Thomas, R. andVenkatraman, T. S.Sugar-sorghum hybrids. Agr. Jour. India25: 164. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  545. Thompson, W. P. Causes of difference in success of reciprocal interspecific crosses. Am. Nat.64: 407–421. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  546. —. The causes of hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Trans. Royal Soc. Canada34 (Sec. V): 1–13. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  547. Tinney, F. W. Chromosome behavior inAgrostis nebulosa. Bot. Gaz.97: 822–833. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  548. —. Cytology of parthenogenesis inPoa pratensis. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 351–360. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  549. — andAamodt, O. S. The progeny test as a measure of the types of seed-development inPoa pratensis L. Jour. Hered.31: 457–464. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  550. Tischler, G. Untersuchungen über den Riesenwuchs vonPhragmites cummunis var.Pseudodonax. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.36: 549–558. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  551. —. Pflanzliche Chromosomenzahlen. Tab. Biol.4: 1–83. 1927;7: 109–226. 1931;12: 57–115. 1936;16: 162–218. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  552. —. Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Verbreitung der Angiospermen, erläutert an den Arten Schleswig-Holsteins, mit Ausblicken auf andere Florengebiete. Bot. Jahrb.67: 1–36. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  553. Tometrop, G. Cytological studies on haploidHordeum distichum. Heredftas25: 241–254. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  554. Trumble, H. C. andPhipps, I. F. The inheritance of fluorescence in hybrids between perennial ryegrass and Wimmera ryegrass. Jour. Counc. Sci. Indian Res. Aust.6: 170–178. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  555. Tsiang, Y. S. Variation and inheritance of certain characters of bromegrass,Bromus inermis Leyss. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.36: 508–522. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  556. Turesson, G. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas3: 211–350. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  557. —. Studien überFestuca ovina L. I. Normalgeschlechtliche, halb- und ganzvivipare Typen nordischer Herkunft. Hereditas8: 161–206. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  558. —. Ecotypical selection in SiberianDactylis glomerata L. Hereditas12: 335–351. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  559. —. Studien überFestuca ovina L. II. Chromosomenzahl und Vivipare. Hereditas13: 177–184. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  560. —. Studien überFestuca ovina L. III. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Chromosomenzahlen vivipare Formen. Hereditas15: 13–16. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  561. Tsitsin, N. V. [TheTriticum ×Agropyron hybrids]. Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci. Sib. Inst. Grain Cult., Omsk. 1933. [Pl. Br. Abs.5: 24–25. 1933].

  562. -. [Problems of winter and perennial wheat]. Seljohozgiz, Moscow. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.7: 203–204. 1937].

  563. -. [The problem of perennial wheat]. Selek. Semenovod. No.2: 21–27. 1936. [Herb. Abs.7: 14–15. 1937].

  564. -. [BreedingTriticum-Agropyron hybrids]. Bull. Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci. No.10: 1–4. 1936. [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 385. 1937].

  565. -. [The problem ofTriticum-Agropyron hybrids]. Ogiz-Selk-hozgiz. 1937. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 47–50. 1939].

  566. Ullmann, W. Natural and artificial hybridization of grass species and genera. Herb. Rev.4: 105–142. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  567. Upcott, Margaret. The nature of tetraploidy inPrimula Kewensis. Jour. Genet.39: 79–100. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  568. Vakar, B. A. [Wheat-Agropyron hybrids:A hylogenetic investigation]. Trudy Prikl. Bot. Genet, i Selekeii., II, No. 8: 121–161. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.6: 274–275. 1936].

  569. -. [Cytology ofTriticum-Agropyron hybrids]. Ogiz, Omsk. 1935. [Herb. Abs.7: 204. 1937].

  570. -. [Cytological analysis ofTriticum ×Agropyron hybrids]. Ogiz, Omsk. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.7: 205. 1937].

  571. —. Cytologische Untersuchung der ersten Generation der Weizen-Queckengrasbastarde. Der Züchter7: 199–206. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  572. —. Cytologische Utersuchung über F1 der Weizen-Queckengras Bastarde. Cytologia7: 293–312. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  573. -. [A cytological study of F1-FeTriticum vulgare ×Agropyron intermedium hybrids]. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S., Biol.,1938: 627–641. [Pl. Br. Abs.9: 296. 1939].

  574. -et al. [Studies on wheat hybrids. Cytological memoir]. Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci., Sib. Inst. Grain Cult., Omsk. 1934. [Pl. Br. Abs.5: 313–315. 1935].

  575. Verushkin, S. M. [On the way towards perennial wheat:Triticum ×Agropyrum hybrids]. Social. Zern. Hoz. No. 4: 77–83. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.6: 82. 1936].

  576. -. [Hybridization ofTriticum withAgropyron], Ogiz, Saratov. 1935. [Eng. sum.] [Herb. Abs.7: 205. 1937].

  577. -. [The prospects of hybridizing wheat withAgropyrum]. Selek. Semenovodstvo No. 2: 28–33. 1936. [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 184–185. 1937].

  578. -. [The main lines of work withTriticum-Agropyrum hybrids at the Saratov Station]. Selek. Semenovodstvo No.8: 23–35. 1936. [Pl. Br. Abs.7: 302. 1937].

  579. -. [The main trend in the work withTriticumx Agropyron hybrids at the Saratov Plant Breeding Station]. Pod. Znam. Marx. No. 7: 144–158. 1936. [Herb. Abs.7: 206. 1937].

  580. — andShekhurdin, A. Hybrids between wheat and couch grass. FertileTriticum-Agropyrum hybrids of great scientific and practical interest. Jour. Hered.24: 329–335. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  581. Vijayaraghavan, C. andSeshadri Sarma, P. R. 42—An economic recessive mutant from E. C. 593 ragi (Eleusine coracana (Gaertn). Curr. Sri.6: 611–612. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  582. Vinall, H. N. andCron, A. B. Improvement of sorghums by hybridization. Jour. Hered.12: 435–443. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  583. — andHein, M. A. Breeding miscellaneous grasses. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1937: 1032–1102. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  584. Walle, Otto. Inzuchtuntersuchungen beiFestuca rubra L. Pflanzenbau7: 586–606, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  585. Wanscher, J. H. The basic chromosome number of the higher plants. New Phytol.33: 101–126. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  586. Watkins, A. E. Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Jour. Genet.25: 125–162. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  587. Webber, J. M. Polyembryony. Bot. Rev.6: 575–598. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  588. Wexelsen, H. Chlorophyll-deficient seedlings in timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Jour. Hered.32: 227–231. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  589. White, W. J. Intergeneric crosses betweenTriticum andAgropyron. Sci. Agr.21: 198–232. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  590. Winkler, H. Ein interessanter Fund von wildwachsendemLolium perenne L. nebst einem aus demselben erhaltenen, spontanen Bastard mitFestuca pratensis Huds (=Festuca loliacea Curt.) in der Provinz Angermanland in Nordschweden. Bot. Not.1938: 440–457. 1938. [Pages 456–457, include Akerberg, E.—The chromosome number in the hybrid and its parents].

    Google Scholar 

  591. Witte, H. Über weibliche Sterilität beim Timotheegras (Phleum pratense L.) und ihre Erblichkeit. Svensk. Bot. Tid.13: 23–42. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  592. Woodforde, A. H. The inheritance of fluorescence in derivatives of perennial × Italian ryegrass. A preliminary note. Tasm. Jour. Agr.4: 120–122. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  593. —. The inheritance of a substance in the roots of seedling hybrid derivatives ofLolium perenne L. xLolium multiflorum Lam. causing a fluorescence reaction visible in filter-paper by screened ultra-violet light. Jour. Linn. Soc., Bot.50: 141–150. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  594. Woodworth, C. M. Inheritance of seedling stem color in a broomcornsorghum cross. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 325–327. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  595. Wulff, H. D. Chromosomenstudien an der schleswig-holsteinischen Angiospermen—Flora I. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.55: 262–269. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  596. —. Chromosomenstudien an der schleswig-holsteinischen Angiospermen—Flora IV. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.57: 424–431. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  597. Yamaura, A. Karyologische und embryologische Studien über einige Bambusarten. (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Bot. Mag. Tokyo47: 551–555. 1933. [Jap., German sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  598. Young, E. M. andCrocker, C. G. Chromosome studies inDigitaria species. I. So. Afr. Jour. Sci.30: 258–265. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  599. Zherebrina, Z. N. Essay of a botanical-agronomical study of awnless brome grass (Bromus inermis Leyss). Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet., & Pl. Breed.25: 201–352. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  600. Zollikofer, Clara. Zur Fortpflanzung vonPoa alpina L. Jahrb. St. Gallischen Naturwiss. Ges.65: 99–117. 1930. [Abridged translation by Dr. E. L. Nielsen].

    Google Scholar 

  601. Armstrong, J. M. Investigations inTriticum-Agropyron hybridization. Emp. Jour. Exp. Agr.13: 41–53. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  602. Burton, G. W. A study of Dallis grass seed sources. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron. [In press].

  603. Clausen, J.et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. II. Plant evolution through amphidiploidy and autopolyploidy, with examples from theMadiinae. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Pub. 564. 1945.

  604. Harlan, J. R. Natural breeding structure in theBromus carinatus complex as determined by population analyses. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 142–148. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  605. Stephens, J. C. andQuinby, J. R. The Ms2 A V10 linkage group in sorghum. Jour. Agr. Res.70: 209–218. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  606. Stuckey, Irene H. andBanfield, W. G. Morphological variation and the occurrence of aneuploids in some species ofAgrostis in New England. [In manuscript].

Download references

Authors
  1. W. M. Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, W.M. Cytology and genetics of forage grasses. Bot. Rev 13, 369–421 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861822

Keywords

Search

Navigation