Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid inbreeding in maize

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of inbreeding generations required to produce homozygotes may be reduced if the more homozygous individuals in each breeding generation are selected phenotypically in the segregating progenies for further inbreeding. To demonstrate this, inbred lines and their F1, S1, and S2 progenies were studied for number of days from planting to anthesis, plant height and total leaf number. The data indicated that a high degree of control of rate of inbreeding may be obtained by proper use of heterotic characteristics in selection. The technique is a simple one: the selection of those individuals in a segregating array that most closely approach the characteristics of the ultimate homozygotes obtainable from the population. If these traits are undefined, then simple negative selection for heterotic attributes should suffice. In an S1 progeny of maize, an individual with the same number of leaves and (1) as short as and (2) as slow to flower as the parental inbreds will be likely to be more homozygous than its taller and earlier flowering sibs of like leaf number. Since the inbreeder’s aim is not homozygosis per se but the development of agronomically useful homozygotes, the population dealt with should be sufficiently large to permit intense selection for outstanding individuals among the more homozygous members of each generation of selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E., and W. L. Brown. 1952. Origin of cornbelt maize and its genetic significance.In Heterosis (ed. by J. W. Gowen). Iowa State College Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chase, S. S. 1947. Techniques for isolating monoploid maize plants. Amer. Jour. Bot.34: 582.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —. 1949a. Monoploid frequencies in a commercial double cross hybrid maize, and its component single cross hybrids and inbred lines. Genetics34: 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. 1949b. The reproductive success of monoploid maize. Amer. Jour. Bot.36: 795–796.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. 1951a. Spontaneous doubling of the chromosome complement in monoploid sporophytes of maize. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci.56: 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ---. 1951b. The monoploid method of developing inbred lines. Proc. 6th Annual Hybrid Corn Industry-Research Conf.

  7. —. 1952a. Monoploids in Maize. In Heterosis (ed. by J. W. Gowen). Iowa State College Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —. 1952b. Production of homozygous diploids of maize from monoploids. Agron. Jour.44: 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —. 1952c. Selection for parthenogenesis and monoploid fertility in maize. Genetics37: 573–574.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ---. 1958. The utilization of parthenogenesis in maize breeding. Proc. X Int. Cong. Genetics, Vol. II.

  11. —. 1961. Tecnica de endocria acelerada. Actas de la Quinta Reunión Latinoamericana de Fitotécnia. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  12. —. 1964. Analytic breeding of amphipolyploid plant varieties. Crop Sci.4: 334–337.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, and D. K. Nanda. 1965. Comparison of variability in inbred lines and monoploid-derived lines of maize. Crop Sci.5: 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —, and —. 1967. Number of leaves and maturity classification inZea mays L. Crop Sci.7: 431–432.

    Google Scholar 

  15. East, E. M., and D. F. Jones. 1919. Inbreeding and outbreeding. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emerson, R. A. 1948. Maize Cooperation News Letter.

  17. Galinat, W. C. 1961. Corn’s evolution and its significance for breeding. Econ. Bot.15: 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston, G. S. 1966. Manifestations of teosinte and “Tripsacum” introgression in Corn Belt maize. Ph.D. Thesis 1966. The Bussey Institution of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, D. F., and W. R. Singleton. 1935. The improvement of naturally cross-pollinated plants by selection in self-fertilized lines. II. The testing and utilization of inbred strains of corn. Conn. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull.376: 653–691.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lush, J. L. 1945. Animal breeding plans. Iowa State College Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1947. The origin and evolution of maize. Adv. Gen.1: 161–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. —. 1952. Hybridization in the evolution of maize.In: Heterosis (ed. by J. W. Gowen). Iowa State College Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  23. —. 1965. The evolution of maize.In: Essays on crop plant evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nanda, D. K., and S. S. Chase. 1966. An embryo marker for detecting monoploids of maize(Zea mays L.). Crop Sci.6: 213–215.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson, D. L. 1953. Combining ability of homozygous diploids of corn relative to lines derived by inbreeding. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State College.

  26. Thompson, D. L. 1954. Combining ability of homozygous diploids of corn relative to lines derived by inbreeding. Agron. Jour.46: 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Trojan Seed Co., Windfall, Indiana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chase, S.S., Nanda, D.K. Rapid inbreeding in maize. Econ Bot 23, 165–173 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860622

Keywords

Navigation