Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of landscape pattern of old growth forests of Korean pine by block kriging

  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study area was located in Liangshui Natural Reserve. Xaoxing’an Mountains. Northeastern China Korean pine forests are the typical forest ecosystem and landscapes in this region. It is a high degrees of spatial and temporal heterogeneity at different scales, which effected on landscape pattern and processes. In this paper we used the data of 144 plots and semivariogram to analyze spatial heterogeneity of old growth forests of Korean pine in landscape level. Model for forest variations by isotropic semivariogram is linear with sill. The spatial heterogeneity is dependent on scales and directions in Korean pine forests. Patterns of forest types in space were resulted from complex interactions between physical and biological forces. We used 20 metres for interpolation interval to estimate the values of unsampled area. Comparing the results with field data, block kriging and mapping are an effective techniques to simulate landscape pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartrell, S.M. et al. 1991. A spatial-temporal model of nitrogen dynamics in a deciduous forest watershed. In quantitative methods in landscape ecology (eds by Turner et al). Springer-Verlage, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1983. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. Journal of Soil Science 34:577–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1987. Spatial aspects of ecological data. Pages 89–125 in R.H. Jongman et al editors. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Dake et al. 1982. Ecological Review of Korean pine forests. J. of Northeast forestry Univ. 9(2):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C. 1991. Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T. et al. 1986. Landscape Ecology, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, L. 1988. A general model of populations in patchy habitats. Applied Mathematics and Computation 27: 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H. et al 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 1: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H. et al 1991. Pattern. process, and predictability: The use of neutal models for landscape analysis. In Quantitative methods in landscape ecology (eds by Turner et al) Spring-Verlag. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E.H. et al. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A et al. 1987. Mining geostatistics. Academic Press. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirge, D.G. 1966. Two dimensional weighted moving average trend surfaces for ore-evaluation. J. of South African Inst. Min. Metal. 66:13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. et al. 1991. Ecological heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. et al. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegentatio. 80:107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. et al. 1989. Dynamical models of ecosystems and epidemics. Future Generation Computer Systems 5:265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. et al. 1988. Landscape ecology: a new conceptual framework in ecology Advances in Ecology(Chines). 5(1):23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. et al. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73(2):280–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. et al. 1993. Forests of Heilongjiang. Forestry Press. Beijing. China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58:1246–1266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1988. Measuring the fractal dimension of landscape. Appl. Math. Comput. 27:67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V. et al. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1:153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. 1988. Fractal geometry: a toll for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetation 75:91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P.G. 1987. Landscape Ecology: state-of-art. In landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. New York: Springer-Verlag, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G.P. 1987. Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with known variance. Ecology, 68:744–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G.P. et al. 1988. Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69:1517–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W.H. 1982. Fir and landscape diversity in subaloine forests of Yellow stone National Park. Ecological Monographs, 52:199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R.E. et al. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecological Monographs. 62:277–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, F.H. et al. 1991. The development of spatial simulation modeling for landscape ecology: A review and prognosis. In Quantitative methods in landscape ecology (eds by Turner et al) Spring-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trangmar, B.B. et al. 1985. Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Advanced Agronomy 38:44–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1987. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape Ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syet. 20:171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. et al. 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Advance in Soil Science 3:1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens. J.A. 1988. The analysis of landscape patterns: interdisciplinary seminar in ecology. Colorado State Univ.

  • Wang, Y. et al. 1996. Korean Pine Forests. Northeasi Forestry University Press, Harbin. China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.Q. et al. 1997. Quantification of spatial heterogeneity in old growth forests of korean pine. J. of Forestry Research. 8(2):65–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This project is supported by Huo Yingdong Science fundation.

Responsible Editor: Chai Ruihai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhengquan, W., Yandong, Z., Qingcheng, W. et al. Simulation of landscape pattern of old growth forests of Korean pine by block kriging. Journal of Forestry Research 8, 131–136 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855404

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855404

Key wards

Navigation