Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance of potato to infection by mechanically introduced virus X

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Progeny in the cross of susceptible X 927-3 (female) potato by susceptible B 2903-17 (male) were found to possess resistance to infection by virus X mechanically inoculated into Irish potato. Preliminary evidence indicated a close similarity to or identity with the immunity from virus X demonstrated by 41956. Examination of the pedigrees of parental lines and the pedigree of 41956 showed several similarities, but no common source of resistance was involved, unless it be the USDA Seedling 24642. Previously proposed theories of the origin of immunity from virus X were discussed, and the authors suggest that although their findings can be explained by a dominant complimentary gene theory, insufficient information is available to support either this or the recessive gene theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1952. Potatoes. Scottish Soc. Res. Plant Breeding Ann. Abridged Rpt, Edinburgh.

  2. Benson, A. P. and W. J. Hooker. 1958. Recovery of virus X from “immune” potato varieties (Solanum tubcrosum L.) Abs. Am. Potato J. 35:421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinch, Phyllis E. M. 1944. Observations of a severe strain of potato virus X. Roy. Dublin Soc. Sci. Proc. N.S. 23: 273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hooker, W. J., C. E. Peterson, and R. G. Timian. 1954. Virus X resistance in potato. Am. Potato J. 31: 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hutton, E. M. 1951. Possible genotypes conditioning virus resistance in the potato and tomato. Austral. Inst. Agri. Sci. J. 17: 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. — and D. C. Wark. 1952. A relationship between immunity and localized reaction to virus X in the potato. (Solanum tuberosum). Austral. J. Sci. Res. Ser. B. 5: 237–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raleigh, W. P. 1936. An abnormal graft reaction in potato resulting from virus infection of a scion on a resistant stock. Phytopathology 26: 795–796.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salaman, R. N. 1938. The potato virus X: its strains, and reactions. Roy. Soc. Lond. Phil. Trans. Ser. B. 229: 137–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultz, E. S., C. F. Clark, Reiner Bonde, W. P. Raleigh, and F. J. Stevenson. 1934. Resistance of potato to mosaic and other virus diseases. Phytopathology. 24:116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  10. —, C. F. Clark, F. J. Stevenson, and W. P. Raleigh. 1937. Resistance of the potato to latent mosaic. Am. Potato J. 14: 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. — and W. P. Raleigh. 1933. Resistance of potato to latent mosaic. Phytopathology (Abs.) 23:32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson, F. J., E. S. Schultz, and C. F. Clark. 1939. Inheritance of immunity from virus X (Latent Mosaic) in the potato. Phytopathology 29: 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Journal Paper No. J-3691 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, Project No. 1184.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kehr, A.E., Horton, J.C. Resistance of potato to infection by mechanically introduced virus X. American Potato Journal 37, 61–66 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855061

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855061

Keywords

Navigation