Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A taxonomic survey of the generaPetasites andEndocellion

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper summarizes all accepted species and subspecies of the generaPetasites andEndocellion, together with important synonyms, type quotations, main diacritical characters, and an outline of their distribution. The new taxa described in this study are as follows: subgen.Capillopetalum, sect.Cricostigma, sect.Schistostigma, sect.Trichostigma, sect.Sceptrostigma, further ser.Japonici, ser.Orientales, ser.Fragrantes, ser.Spurii, ser.Imberbes, ser.Sagittati, and subspeciesPetasites frigidus subsp.sibiricus. New combinations:Petasites radiatus (J. F. Gmel.),P. rubellus (J. F. Gmel.)P. hybridus subsp.georgicus (Manden.),P. nivalis subsp.vitifolius (L. E. Greene),P. nivalis subsp.hyperboreus (Rydb.),P. palmatus subsp.speciosus (Nutt.),Endocellion sibiricum (J. F. Gmel.) andE. glaciale (Ledeb.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bobrov, E. G. (1960): Species Georgianae neglectae e “Flora Baicalensis”.—Bot. Mater. Gerb Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR [Not. Syst. Herb. Inst. Bot. Komarovii Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.], Leningrad, 20: 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, A. L. (1968): Evidence for the hybrid origin ofPetasites warrenii andP. vitifolius.— Rhodora, Cambridge [U.S.A.], 70: 533–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. (1955):Petasites.—In:Hitchcock, C. L., Cronquist, A., Ownbey, M., etThompson, J. W.: Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest, Part 5: 272–274.—Seattle.

  • Dandy, J. E. (1967): Index of generic names of vascular plants 1753–1774.—Regnum Veget., Utrecht, 51: 16, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druce, G. C. (1914): The abridgement of Miller's Cardener's Dictionary of 1754.—Bot. Exch. Club Soc. Brit. Isles, Manchester, 3: 426–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, E. (1960): Flora of Aleutian Islands, Ed. 2.—Stockholm.

  • Imazu, T. etFujishita, N. (1962): Morphological, ecological and cytological studies on cultivated and wild Butterburs,Petasites japonicus Maxim., IV. On the chromosome numbers.—Journ. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci., Tokyo, 31: 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, S. (1942):Compositae Japonicae (Pars tertia).—Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ., Ser. B, 16: 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, S. (1955): Flowering Plants and Ferns.—In:Kihara, H. [ed]: Fauna and flora of Nepal Himalaya. Scientific results of Japanese expeditions to Nepal Himalaya 1952–1953, vol. 1.—Kyoto.

  • Koyama, H. (1968): Taxonomic studies on the TribeSenecioneae of Eastern Asia. II. Enumeration of the species of Eastern Asia.—Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ., Ser. Biol., 2: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuprijanova, L. A. (1961):Petasites etNardosmia.—In:Šiškin, B. K. etBobrov, E. G. [ed.]: Flora SSSR, 26: 642–654.—Moskva et Leningrad.

  • Kutateladze, Š. (1971): Nomenklaturnye typy vidov, opisanych iz okresnostej Tbilisi.—Tbilisi.

  • Lanjouw, J. etStafleu, F. A. (1964): [1] The Herbaria of the World, Ed. 5 (1964): [2] Collectors Pars 1. (1954), Pars 2 (1957).—Utrecht.

  • Linsbauer, K. [ed.] (1917): C. K. Schneiders illustriertes Handwörterbuch der Botanik. Ed. 2.— Leipzig.

  • Mansfeld, R. (1938): Zur Nomenklatur der Farn-und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands.—Repert. Spec. Nov. Regn. Veget. [ed.Fedde, F.], Berlin, 44: 320, 45: 200.

  • Novotný, L., Toman, J. et al. (1966): Contribution to the chemotaxonomy, of some EuropeanPetasites species.—Phytochemistry, Oxford, New York, London et Paris, 5: 1281–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotný, L., Toman, J. etHerout, V. (1968): Terpenoids of thePetasites paradoxus andPetasites kablikianus in relation to their phylogeny.—Phytochemistry, Oxford, New York, London et Paris, 7: 1349–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotný, L., Toman, J. et al. (1972): Terpenoids of thePetasites japonicus and some otherPetasites species in relation to their systematic position—Phytochemistry, Oxford, New York, London et Paris [in press].

  • Panigrahi, G. etKar, S. H. (1967): The FamilyCompositae in Assam and East Frontier Angency. —Bull. Bot. Surv. India, Calcutta, 8: 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin, N. (1959): Circumpolar arctic flora.—Oxford.

  • Rydberg, P. A. (1927):Petasites.—In:Britton, N. L. et al. [ed.]: North American Flora, Vol. 34: 310–315.—New York.

  • Savage, S. (1945): A Catalogue of the Linnean herbarium.—London.

  • Sokolovskaja, A. P. etStrelkova, O. S. (1960): Geografičeskoje rasprostranenije poliploidnych vidov rastenij v Evraziatskoj Arktike.—Bot. Žurn. [Bot. Journ.], Moskva et Leningrad, 45: 370–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskaja, A. P. etStrelkova, O. S. (1962): O zakonomernostijach geografičeskogo rasprostranenija poliploidnych vidov rastenij.—Trudy Mosk. Obšč. Ispyt. Prirody. [Acta Soc. Natur. Mosc.], Moskva, 5: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. etChristiansen, H. (1964): Contribution to the chromosomal cytology ofPetasites. —Bot. Tidskr., Copenhagen, 59: 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A. (1967): Taxonomic literature. A selective guide to botanical publications with dates, commentaries and types.—Utrecht.

  • Šourek, J. (1962): RodPetasites v Československu.—Rozpravy Čs. Akad. Věd, Ser. Mat.-Natur., Praha, 72/5: 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tausch, I. (1828): Diagnoses plantarum novarum aut minus coqnitarum. Tom. 2.—Ratisbonae.

  • Tenore, M. (1831): Ad Florae Neapolitanae Syllogem appendix tertia.—Neapoli.

  • Tenore, M. (1842): Ad Florae Neapolitanae Syllogem appendix quinta.—Neapoli.

  • Toman, J. (1965): Devětsil japonský obrovitý—Petasites japonicus (Sieb. etZucc.)Maxim. subsp.giganteus Kitamura, nový zdomácnělý taxon v ČSSR.—Čas. Nár. Muz., cl. Natur., Praha, 134: 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, J. (1966):Petasites.—Zprávy Čs. Bot. Společ., Praha, 1: 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, J. etStarý, F. (1965): Neue Erkenntnisse über die ArtPetasites kablikianus.— Preslia, Praha, 37: 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, J. etStarý, F. (1966): Über die Verbreitung der ArtPetasites kablikianus.— Preslia, Praha, 38: 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, J. etSýkora, T. (1968): Původ druhuPetasites kablikianus v Ještědském pohoří. —Zprávy Čs. Bot. Společ., Praha, 3: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachsel, K. (1829): Einige Bemerkungen zu Steudel's und Hochstetter's Enumeratio Plantatum. —Flora, Regensburg, 12/1: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautvetter, E. R. (1883): Incrementa Florae Phanerogamea Rossicae.—Petropoli.

  • Uexküll-Gyllenband, M. (1901): Phylogenie der Blütenformen und der Geschlechterverteilung bei den Compositen.—Biblioth. Bot., Stuttgart, 10/52: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Experimental Garden in Průhonice near Praha, Praha, Czechslovak

    Jan Toman

Authors
  1. Jan Toman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toman, J. A taxonomic survey of the generaPetasites andEndocellion . Folia geobot. phytotax. 7, 381–406 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854767

Keywords

Search

Navigation