Skip to main content
Log in

Ergasiophygophytes and xenophytes of East Asiatic origin in Adjaria a stimulus to new terminology, especially for ergasiophygophytes

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of the Adjarian flora resulted in a detailed classification of the ergasiophygophytes, based mainly on the degree of their naturalization: (1) The ephemeroergasiophygophytes display unstable naturalization both in artificial and natural habitats, and disappear after only a few growing seasons. (2) The deuteroergasiophygophtes show stable naturalization in anthropogenic habitats. (3) The protoergasiophygophytes are distinguished by uncertain stability of naturalization in natural habitats, and, if firmly naturalized on a certain spot, they lack any tendency to further spreading. (4) The autergasiophygophytes tend to spread in natural habitats. (5) The aggressive ergasiophygophytes transform natural vegetation in new plant communities, and can become dominant species in these communities. New terms, viz. emphemeroxenophytes, protoneophytes, non-aggressive neophytes, slightly aggressive neophytes, and postneophytes with vegetative reproduction have also been introduced to express diverse features of the xenophytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Davitadze, S. (in press): Vostočnoaziatskije elementy v alochtonnoj flore Adžarii.—Izvěst. Batums. Bot. Sada, Tbilisi.

  • Dmitrijeva, A. A. (1967): K voprosu o zanosnych i dičajuščich rastěnijach Batumskogo poberež'ja.—Izvěst. Batum. Bot. Sada, Tbilisi, 14: 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Džavachišvili, I. (1930): Sakartvelos ekonomiuri istoria, 1.—Tbilisi.

  • Faliński, J. B. (1969): Neofity i neofityzm. Diskusje fitosocjologiczne (5).—Ekol. Polska, Ser. B, Warszawa, 15: 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1915): Zamětki o flore Kolchidy.—Věst. Tifl. Bot. Sada, Tbilisi, 11/2: 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1934): Flora Kavkaza, 4, ed. 1.—Baku.

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1939): Flora Kavkaza, 1, ed. 2.—Baku.

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1939): O raspostraněnii po Kavkazu subtropičeskich odnodolnych prišelcev—sornjakov.—Baku.

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1940): Flora Kavkaza, 2, ed. 2.—Baku.

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1945): Flora Kavkaza, 3, ed. 2.—Baku.

  • Grossgejm, A. A. etMakašvili, A. K. (1929): K voprosu o proischožděnii, sostave i charaktere sornoj rastitěl'nosti čajnych plantacij Zapadnoj Gruzii i Adžaristana.—Trudy po Priklad. Bot., Genet. i Selekc., Leningrad, 22/4: 43–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. etJirásek, V. (1967): Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie.— Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 2: 69–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. etJirásek, V. (1971): Slovníček fytogeografických termínů.—Preslia, Praha 43: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolakovskij, A. A. etSachokija, M. F. (1946): Novyje dannyje k adventivnoj flore Černomorskogo poberež'ja Kavkaza.—Soobšč. AN GSSR, Tbilisi, 7/3: 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makašvili, A. K. (1936): Zanosnyje sornyje rastěnija vlažnych subtropikov SSSR.—In:Gajdamakin, V. I., Makašvili, A. K., Jabrova, V. S., etJarošenko, P. D.: Sornyje rastěnija vlažnych subtropikov SSSR i měry bor'by s nimi. p. 90–102 et fig. 15–26.—Suchumi.

  • Makašvili, A. K. (1943): Novyje dannyje k adventivnoj flore Kavkaza.—Soobšč. AN GSSR, Tbilisi, 4/8: 809–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandžavidze, D. V., Cicvidze, A. T., Matinjan, A. B., Morozova, T. A., Tatišvili, G. S. etTatarišvili, A. N. (1968): Derev'ja i kustarniki Batumskogo botaničeskogo sada.—Tbilisi.

  • Mayr, H. (1925): Waldbau auf naturgeschichtlicher Grundlage.—Berlin.

  • Ponert, J. (1973): 60 let Batumské botanické zahrady.—Zahrádkář, Praha, 5: 277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikli, M. (1903): Die Anthropochoren und der Formenkreis desNasturtium palustre DC.— Achter Bericht der zürcherischen botanischen Gesellschaft 1901–1903, p. 71–82.— Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges., Bern, 13.

  • Šavrov, N. N. (1910): Dva slučaja odičanija tropičeskich rastěnij v Kutaisskoj gubernii— Izvěst. Kavk. Otd. Imper. Rus. Geogr. Obšč., Tbilisi, 20/1 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šuĺgina, V. V. (1954):Spiraea.—In: Derev'ja i kustarniki SSSR, Moskva et Leningrad, 3: 269–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thellung, A. (1905): Einteilung der Ruderal-und Adventivflora in genetische Gruppen.— In:Naegeli, O. etThellung, A.: Die Flora des Kantons Zürich. 1. Teil: Die Ruderal und Adventiv Flora des Kantons Zürich.— Vierteljahrschrift Naturforsch. Ges. Zürich, 50: 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thellung, A. (1915): Pflanzenwanderungen unter dem Einfluss des Menschen.—Englers Bot. Jahr., Beiblatt, Leipzig, 53, 116: 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voronov, Ju. N. (1916): O zanosnych rastěnijach Kavkazskoj flory.—Izvěst. Kavk. Muz., Tbilisi, 10/1: 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponert, J. Ergasiophygophytes and xenophytes of East Asiatic origin in Adjaria a stimulus to new terminology, especially for ergasiophygophytes. Folia geobot. phytotax. 12, 9–22 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854506

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854506

Keywords

Navigation