Skip to main content
Log in

Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluorescent antibody staining procedure

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The indirect fluorescent antibody staining (IFAS) procedure was successfully used in place of the Gram stain procedure to confirm diagnosis of bacterial ring rot. Antisera produced against untreatedCorynebacterium sepedonicum cells, glutaraldehyde-fixed cells, heat-treated glutaraldehydefixed cells, and a cell extract had useful IFAS titers and similar specificity. Optimum antiserum dilution was critical for a reliable test; at high antiserum dilution optimum antigen excess caused poor staining, while at low antiserum dilution non-specific reactions occurred. Although the IFAS procedure was useful as a confirmatory test, its realiability as a diagnostic test is seriously questioned.

Resumen

La prueba de tinción indirecta de anticuerpo fluoroscente (TIAF) fue exitosamente utilizada en vez de la tinción de Gram para confirmar el diagnóstico de la podredumbre anular bacteriana. Antisuero producido contra células deCorynebacterium sepedonicum sin tratar, células fijadas con glutaraldehydo, células tratadas con calor y fijadas con glutaraldehydo y un extracto de células tuvieron títulos TIAF útiles y especificidad similar. Fue crítica para una prueba confiable, la dilución de antisuero; a dilución alta de antisuero el exceso de antígeno produjo tinción pobre, mientras que a dilución baja de antisuero hubieron reacciones no específicas. Aunque el procedimiento TIAF fue útil como prueba confirmativa, su confiabilidad como prueba diagnóstica es seriamente puesta en duda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Allan, E. and A. Kelman. 1977. Immunofluorescent stain procedures for detection and identification ofErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica. Phytopathology 67:1305–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohlool, B.B. and E.L. Schmidt. 1968. Nonspecific staining: its control in immunofluorescence examination of soil. Science 162:1012–1014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Claflin, L.E. and J.F. Shepard. 1977. An agglutination test for the serodiagnosis ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Am Potato J 54:331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel, T.M. and B.W. Janicki. 1978. Mycobacterial antigens: a review of their isolation, chemistry and immunological properties. Microbiol Rev 42:84–113.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. De Boer, S.H. and R.J. Copeman. 1974. Endophytic bacterial flora inSolanum tuberosum and its significance in bacterial ring rot diagnosis. Can J Plant Sci 54:115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Boer, S.H., R.J. Copeman, and H. Vruggink. 1979. Serogroups ofErwinia carotovora potato strains determined with diffusible somatic antigens. Phytopathology 69:316–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Boer, S.H. and A. Kelman. 1975. Evaluation procedures for detection of pectolyticErwinia spp. on potato tubers. Am Potato J 52:117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glick, D.P., P.A. Ark, and H.N. Racicot. 1944. Outline of procedure for the diagnosis of bacterial ring rot of potatoes — Report of the committee of the Potato Association of America. Am Potato J 21:311–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katznelson, H. and M.D. Sutton. 1956. Laboratory detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum, causal agent of bacterial ring rot of potatoes. Can J Bot 34:48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manzer, F.E. and S.A. Slack. 1979. Report of the pathology section committee on bacterial ring rot diagnosis. Am Potato J 56:551–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rai, P.V. and G.A. Strobel. 1967. Phytotoxins ofCorynebacterium. Phytopathology 57:1008 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samson, R. and F. Poutier. 1979. Comparaison de trois méthods d’intification deCorynebacterium sepedonicum dans les tubercules de pomme de terre. Potato Res 22:133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slack, S.A., A. Kelman, and J.B. Perry. 1979. Comparison of three serodiagnostic assays for detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Phytopathology 69:186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Slack, S.A., H.A. Sanford, and F.E. Manzer. 1979. The latex agglutination test as a rapid serological assay forCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Am Potato J 56:441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vruggink, H. 1978. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serodiagnosis of plant pathogenic bacteria. In “Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Path. Bact. Angers 1978”. Station de Pathologie Végétale et Phytobacteriologie, Vol. I, pp. 307–310. Gilbert-Clarey, France.

  16. Vruggink, H. and S.H. De Boer. 1978. Detection ofErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica in potato tubers with immunofluorescence following induction of decay. Potato Res 21:225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Westphal, O. and K. Jann. 1965. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Extraction with phenolwater and further applications of the procedure. In “Methods in carbohydrate chemistry”. R.L. Whistler, Vol. V. pp. 83–91. Academic Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Boer, S.H., Copeman, R.J. Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluorescent antibody staining procedure. American Potato Journal 57, 457–465 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854461

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854461

Key Words

Navigation