Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of in-row spacing and seedtype on the yield and quality of a potato cultivar

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of irregular in-row spacing on tuber production and yield of Russet Burbank potatoes was tested at 2 locations in 1979 and 1980. At a similar mean spacing, no yield reductions were observed when irregular seedpiece spacings (CV levels 25, 50 and 75%) were compared with evenly spaced seedpieces (CV level of 0%). No significant interaction was found between irregular spacing and seedtypes with mass ranging from 59.0 to 67.9 g.

No significant interaction was found between three accurate spacings (30.4, 45.7 and 60.9 cm) and the same range of seedpiece mass; however, the crop grown from large seedpieces had a higher marketable yield at the widest spacing tested.

Mainstem numbers per plant were influenced by seedpiece mass while axillary branches increased with decreases in intra-plant and inter-plant competition.

The incidence of hollow heart was generally unaffected by irregular inrow spacing. Incidence of this disorder was highest in 1979 and appeared to increase with increased plant stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Black, J.H. 1957.In Ivins, J.D. and Milthorpe, F.L. (eds.). The Growth of the Potato. pp. 267. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bleasdale, J.K.A. 1965. Relationship between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes. J Agric Sci 64:361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, D.A. and Lessels, W.J. 1954. The effect of seed rate on the yield of potatoes. J Agric Sci 44:465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho, J.L. and Iritani, W.W. 1983. Comparison of growth and yield parameters of Russet Burbank for a two-year period. Am Potato J 60:569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crumbly, I.J., Nelson, D.C. and Dysen, M.E. 1973. Relationships of hollow heart in Irish potatoes to carbohydrate reabsorption and growth rates of tubers. Am Potato J 50: 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davies, G.J. 1954. Potato Spacing Experiments 1950–52. Report 38. N.I.A.E., Silsoe, England.

  7. Dinkel, D.H. 1960. A study of factors influencing the development of hollow heart in Irish Cobbler potatoes. Abstract from Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn.

  8. El Saeed, A.K. 1963.In Ivins, J.D. and Milthorpe, F.L. (eds.). The Growth of the Potato. pp. 268–273. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Entz, M.H. and LaCroix, L.J. 1983. A survey of planting accuracy of commercial potato planters. Am Potato J 60:617–623.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, P.M. 1978.In Harris, P.M. (ed.). The Potato Crop. pp. 196–239. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iritani, W.M., Thornton, R., Weiler, L. and O’Leary, G. 1972. Relationships of seed size, spacing, stem number to yield of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 49:463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvis, R.H. and Shotton, F.E. 1971. Population studies with King Edward potatoes. Exp Husb 20:12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvis, R.H. and Palmer, G.M. 1973. Effect of type of planter on the growth and yield of maincrop potatoes. Exp Husb 24:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarvis, R.H., Rogers-Lewis, D.S. and Bray, W.E. 1976. Effect of irregular set spacing on maincrop potatoes. Exp Husb 30:28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levitt, J. 1942. A histological study of hollow heart of potatoes. Am Potato J 19:134–143.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch, D.R. and Rowberry, R.G. 1977. Population density studies with Russet Burbank. II. The effect of fertilization and plant density on growth, development and yield. Am Potato J 54:57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson, D.C. 1970. Effect of planting date, spacing and potassium on hollow heart in Norgold Russet potatoes. Am Potato J 47:130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson, D.C. and Thoreson, M.C. 1974. Effect of root pruning and sub-lethal rates of dinoseb on hollow heart of potatoes. Am Potato J 51: 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson, D.C., Jones, D.A. and Thoreson, M.C. 1979. Relationships between weather, plant spacing and the incidence of hollow heart in Norgold Russet potatoes. Am Potato J 56: 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Painter, C.G., Ohms, R.E. and Walz, A. 1977. Effect of planting date, seed spacing, nitrogen rate and harvest date on yield and quality of potatoes in southwestern Idaho. Idaho Agric Ext Bull 571:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pascal, J.A., Robertson, T.P. and Langley, A. 1977. Yield effects of regularly and irregularly spaced potato tubers. Exp Husb 32:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reestman, A.J. and DeWit, C.T. 1959. Yield and size distribution of potatoes as influenced by seed rate. Neth J Agric Sci 7:257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scott, R.K. and Younger, A. 1972. Potato agronomy in a changing industry. Outlook Agric 7:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schepers, A. 1975. The effect of irregular spacing on the yield and grade of seed potatoes. Bedrijfsontwikkeling 6:1019–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Svensson, B. 1973. Development of potato stands in relation to density. Swed J Agric Res 3:3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Svensson, B. and Naglicka, I. 1975. Development of potato stands in relation to stand density. Potato Res 18:105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taha, M.A. 1961.In Ivins, J.D. and Milthorpe, F.L. (eds.). The Growth of the Potato. pp. 267–278. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 638, Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Entz, M.H., LaCroix, L.J. The effect of in-row spacing and seedtype on the yield and quality of a potato cultivar. American Potato Journal 61, 93–105 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852882

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852882

Key Words

Navigation