Skip to main content
Log in

Cefoperazone: An analysis of results in the pediatric population from a post-marketing surveillance study in hospitalized patients

  • Special Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The injectable third-generation cephalosporin, cefoperazone, was introduced in India in early 1994. A post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in 1994–95 to collect local data on efficacy and safety, evaluate the native pattern of bacterial susceptibility, and assess the relationship ofin vitro susceptibility tests to clinical efficacy. Hospitalized patients with features suggestive of infections that are approved indications for cefoperazone were eligible for the study. This report presents an analysis of the results among patients in the pediatric age group. The recommended dose range for children was 50–200 mg/kg/day. At analysis, 95 patients aged 6 days to 14 years were evaluable for efficacy. About a third of these (31%) were judged to have hospital acquired infections, and 22 (23%) had failed prophylaxis or previous treatment.

A successful clinical outcome was observed in 91% of 75 non-neutropenic patients. Eighteen (95%) of 19 patients with pneumonia and 8 (89%) of 9 patients with pyogenic meningitis responded to cefoperazone. Five of 6 patients with complicated or hospital-acquired upper urinary tract infections, 2 of 3 patients with peritonitis, and all patients with skin or soft tissue infections, intra-abdominal abscess, ostemyelitis, and brain abscess also responded. Four of 5 non-neutropenic patients with septicemia recovered with cefoperazone monotherapy. The response rate was 70% among 20 neutropenic patients, 16 of whom were deemed septicemic. Antibiotic disc susceptibility data among pediatric patients was available for 63 isolates and 13% were reported resistant to cefoperazone. Microbiologic eradication was reported with 94% of initial isolates. Mild to moderate adverse events of study, drug-related or uncertain causation occurred in 4 (3.7%) of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gordon AJ, Phyfferoen M. Cefoperazone sodium in the treatment of serious infections in 2,100 adults and children; multicentered trials in Europe, Latin America, and Australia.Rev Infect Dis 1983; 5 (Suppl): S188-S199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barillari A, Devriendt E, Cieters P,et al. Open multicenter study of cefoperazone in the treatment of severe infections in the pediatric age group.Curr Ther Res 1987; 41: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee JS, Kim DH, Chin DS,et al. Clinical study of cefoperazone in the treatment of bacterial infection in the practice of pediatrics.New Med J (Korea), 1985; 28: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi Y, Morikawa Y, Haruta T, Fujiwara T. Clinical evaluation of cefoperazone in children.Jpn J Antibiot 1980; 33: 910–915.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuda H, Yoshida T, Kagata N, Niino S. Clinical examination of cefoperazone in pediatrics.Jpn J Antibiot 1980; 33: 935–940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Motohiro T, Sakata Y; Fujimoto T;et al. Treatment of whooping cough and whooping cough syndrome by cefoperazone (author’s trans).Jpn J Antibiot 1980; 33: 1183–1193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pape JW, Gerdes H, Orioll. Typhoid fever; Successful therapy with cefoperazone.J Infect Dis 1986; 153: 272–276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soe GB, Overturf GD. Treatment of typhoid fever and other systemic salmonelloses with cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone, and other newer cephalosporins.Rev Infect Dis 1987; 9: 719–736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neu HC. A review and summary of the pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone; a new, extended-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic.Ther Drug Monitoring 1981; 3: 121–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrasekar PH. Bacterial infections in hospitalized patients.Ind J Int Med 1995; 5 (suppl 5): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saito A, Ueda Yasushi. Multicenter clinical trials of cefoperazone in Japan.Clinical Therapeutics 1984; 7 (1): 49–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The cefoperazone collaborative post-marketing surveillance study group. Cefoperazone: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study in patients and correlation ofin vitro susceptibility tests with clinical outcome.Hosp Today 1997; 2(5): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cristiano P, Pempinello R, Iovene MR, Coppola L, Altucci P. Cefoperazone therapy of bacterial meningits; a clinical trial.Infection 1989; 17 (6): 378–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitamura K, Shimizu T, Abe H,et al. Clinical studies of cefoperazone in neurosurgery.Jpn J Antibiot 1986; 39 (1): 63–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda Y. Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of cefoperazone sodium in world-wide studies of 4,485 adults and paediatric patients.International Medicine 1983; 2 (3): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murray PR. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests; Testing methods and interpretative problems.In: Poupard JA, Walsh AR, Kleger B, eds. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Critical issues for the 90s.Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol 349, New York: Plenum Press, 1994; 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The Cefoperazone Collaborative Post-marketing Surveillance Study Group., Mukherjee, S. Cefoperazone: An analysis of results in the pediatric population from a post-marketing surveillance study in hospitalized patients. Indian J Pediatr 65, 89–98 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849699

Key words

Navigation