Abstract
We develop a basis-free approach to time-reversal for the quantal angular momentum group,SU2, and apply these methods to the physical symmetrySU2isospin,SU3flavor,SU3nuclear and the nuclear collective symmetry groupSL(3,R) of Gell-Mann and Tomonaga.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E P Wigner, Göttinger Nachrichten,Math. Nachr. 31, 546 (1932)
J P Elliott,Proc. R. Soc. A245, 128 (1958)
(Private communication, 1968). cf. L C Biedenharn and P Truini, inElementary particles and the universe, essays in honor of Murray Gell-Mann, edited by John H Schwarz, Cambridge Univ. Press, (Cambridge, 1991) p. 157 ff
S Tomonaga,Prog. Theor. Phys. (Jpn)13, 467 (1955) (The promised paper applying this method to three dimensions was never published)
R Gilmore,Lie groups, Lie algebras and some of their applications (Wiley, New York, 1974)
B G Wybourne,Classical groups for physicists (Wiley, New York, 1974)
E P Wigner,Group theory and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra (Academic Press, New York, 1959)
L C Biedenharn and J D Louck,Angular momentum in quantum physics, Vol 8 in the Ency. Math and Applications (edited by G-C Rota), (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991)
Jacques Tits, Tabellen zu den einfachen Lie Gruppen und ihren Darstellungen,Lect. Notes in Math 40 (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1967)
Robert Hermann,Lie groups for physicists, (W A Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966)
Every Cartan automorphism (except forD 4) is involuntary, but not necessarily inner. The automorphisms corresponding to Dynkin diagram symmetries are outer [11]
L C Biedenharn,Phys. Rev. 82, 100 (1951)
G Racah,Nuovo. Cimento. 14, 322 (1937)
W Pauli,Rev. Mod. Phys. 13, 203 (1941)
L C Biedenharn and M E Rose,Phys. Rev. 83, 459 (1951)
M Kobayashi and T Maskawa,Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973)
J E Avron, L Sadun, J Segert and B Simon,Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1329 (1988)
M Gell-Mann and Y Ne’eman,The Eightfold way, (W A Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1964)
J D Louck and L C Biedenharn,Adv. Quantum Chem. 23, 129 (1992)
The behaviour ofε under conjugation is not fully known. It is known [21] that for the first occurrence of multiplicity (in the 27-plet) the twoL=2 states are split by a ± sign underC a
E Witten,Nucl. Phys. B223, 422, 433 (1983)
A P Balachandran, V P Nair, S G Rajeev and A Stern,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1124 (1982)
A P Balachandran, V P Nair, S G Rajeev and A Stern,Phys. Rev. D27, 1153 (1983)
Y Dothan, M Gell-Mann and Y Ne’eman,Phys. Lett. 17 148 (1965)
L Weaver and L C Biedenharn,Phys. Lett. B32, 326 (1970)
L Weaver and L C Biedenharn,Nucl. Phys. A185, 1 (1972)
L Weaver, R Y Cusson and L C Biedenharn,Ann. Phys. 102, 493 (1976)
D J Rowe, M G Vassanji and J Carvalho,Nucl. Phys. A504, 76 (1989)
G Rosensteel, inGroup theory and special symmetries in nuclear physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) pp. 332
L C Biedenharn, R Y Cusson, M Y Han and O L Weaver,Phys. Lett. B42, 257 (1972)
Even Wigner fell into these traps, using a phase convention for basis states in his nuclear reaction theory, which conflicted with his phase conventions [8] for the WCG coefficients.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biedenharn, L.C., Sudarshan, E.C.G. A basis-free approach to time-reversal for symmetry groups. Pramana - J. Phys. 43, 255–272 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846842
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846842