Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetics in geoexploration

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Earth and Planetary Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnetic method is the oldest and one of the most widely used geophysical techniques for exploring the earth’s subsurface. It is a relatively easy and inexpensive tool to employ, being applicable to a wide variety of subsurface exploration problems involving horizontal magnetic property variations occurring from near the base of the crust to within the uppermost meter of soil. Successful applications of the magnetic method require an in-depth understanding of its basic principles and careful field work, data reduction, and interpretation. Commonly, interpretations are limited to qualitative approaches which simply map the spatial location of anomalous subsurface conditions, but under favourable circumstances the technological status of the method will permit more quantitative interpretations involving specification of the nature of the anomalous sources. No other geophysical method provides critical input to such a wide variety of problems. However, seldom does the magnetic method provide the complete answer to an investigation problem. As a result, it is generally used in concert with other geophysical and geological data to limit its interpretational ambiguities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agocs W B 1951 Least-squares residual anomaly determination;Geophysics 16 686–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop L E and Talwani M 1984 The East Coast magnetic anomaly;Science 226 1189–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Am K 1972 The arbitrarily magnetized dyke; interpretation by characteristics;Geoexpl. 10 63–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranov V 1957 A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps, psuedo-gravimetric anomalies;Geophysics 22 359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranov V and Naudy H 1964 Numerical calculations of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole;Geophysics 29 67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt J C and Grim M S 1985 Structure of the U.S. Atlantic continental margin from derivative and filtered maps of the magnetic field. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 325–338

  • Bevington P R 1969Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, (New York: McGraw Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford M E, Van Schmus W R and Zietz I 1986 Proterozoic history of the midcontinent region of North America;Geology 14 492–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya B K 1965 Two-dimensional harmonic analysis as a tool for magnetic interpretation;Geophysics 30 829–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya B K 1978 Computer modelling in gravity and magnetic interpretation;Geophysics 43 912–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya B K 1980 A generalized multibody model for inversion of magnetic anomalies:Geophysics 45 255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bott M H P 1973 Inverse methods in the interpretation of magnetic and gravity anomalies. In:Methods in computational physics (ed.) B A Bolt, (New York: Academic Press) vol. 13, pp. 133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Braile L W, Hinze W J, Keller G R, Lidiak E G and Sexton J L 1986 Tectonic development of the New Madrid Rift Complex, Mississippi embayment, North America;Tectonophysics 131 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiner S 1973, Applications manual for portable magnetometers,Geometrics (California: Sunnyvale) pp. 1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome J 1986 Display and enhancement of aeromagnetic data with examples from Guysborough County, Nova Scotia, in:Interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies for non-specialists (ed.) A K Goodacre, Notes for Can. Geophys. Union Short Course: Geol. Surv. Canada, pp. 212–252

  • Byerly P E 1965 Convolution filtering of gravity and magnetic maps;Geophysics 30 281–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cady J W 1980 Calculation of gravity and magnetic anomalies of finitelength right polygonal prisms;Geophysics 45 1507–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler V W 1985 Interpretation of Precambrian geology in Minnesota using low-altitude, high-resolution aeromagnetic data. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 375–391

  • Chandler V W, Koski J S, Hinze W J and Braile L W 1981 Analysis of multisource gravity and magnetic data sets by moving-window application of Poisson’s theorem;Geophysics 46 30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler V W, McSwiggen P L, Morey G B, Hinze W J and Anderson R R 1989 Interpretation of seismic reflection, gravity, and magnetic data across Middle Proterozoic Mid-Continent Rift System, Northwestern Wisconsin, Eastern Minnesota, and Central Iowa;Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol.,73 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean W C 1958 Frequency analysis for gravity and magnetic interpretation;Geophysics 23 97–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dods S D, Teskey D J and Hood P J 1985 The new series of 1:1,000,000-scale magnetic-anomaly maps of the Geol. Surv. of Canada: Compilation techniques and interpretation. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 69–87

  • Donovan T J, Forgey R L and Roberts A A 1979 Aeromagnetic detection of diagenetic magnetite over oil fields;Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 63 245–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper N R and Smith H 1966Applied regression analysis (New York: John Wiley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emilia D A 1973 Equivalent sources used as an analytical base for processing total magnetic field profiles;Geophysics 38 339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin C P and McGinnis L D 1975 Reelfoot rift: Reactivated precursor to the Mississippi embayment;Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86 1287–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D C, Fuller B D and Ward S H 1966 Some numerical techniques for application in mining exploration;Geophysics,31 1066–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller B D 1967 Two-dimensional frequency analysis and design of grid operators;Mining Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists 2 658

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant F S 1972 Review of data processing and interpretation methods in gravity and magnetics 1964–71;Geophysics 37 647–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant F S and West G F 1965Interpretation theory in applied geophysics (New York: McGraw Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin W P 1949 Residual gravity in theory and practice;Geophysics 14 39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty S E 1978 Mineralogical constraints on Curie isotherms in deep crustal magnetic anomalies;Geophys. Res. Lett. 5 105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heirtzler J R 1985 The change in the magnetic anomaly pattern at the ocean-continental boundary. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 339–346

  • Henderson R G 1949 The upward continuation of anomalies in total magnetic intensity fields;Geophysics 14 517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R G 1960 A comprehensive system of automatic computation in magnetic and gravity interpretation;Geophysics 25 569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand T G 1985 Rift structure of the northern Mississippi embayment from the analysis of gravity and magnetic data;J. Geophys. Res. 90 12,607–12,622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand T G, Kucks R P, Kane M F and Hendricks J P 1979 Aeromagnetic map and associated depth map of the upper Mississippi embayment region; U.S. Geol. Surv. Misc. Field Stud. Map, MF-1158

  • Hinze W J and Zietz I 1985 The composite magnetic-anomaly map of the conterminous United States. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 1–24

  • Hinze W J and Kelly W C 1988 Scientific drilling into the Midcontinent Rift System: Probing the processes and products of an ancient continental crustal rupture:EOS 69 1649; 1656–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze W J and Braile L W 1988 Geophysical aspects on the craton: U.S. In:Sedimentary Cover-North American Craton; (ed.) L L Sloss (Boulder, CO, Geol. Soc. Am., The Geology of North America), D-2, 5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze W J and Hildenbrand T G 1988 The utility of geopotential field data in seismotectonic studies in the eastern United States;Seis. Res. Lett. 59 289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze W J and German R A 1989 Geophysical characteristics and geological significance of the New York-Alabama Lineament. In:Regional geophysical lineaments: Their tectonic and economic significance (eds) M N Quereshy and W J Hinze (Geol. Soc. of Indian Mem. 12 111–112)

  • Hinze W J, Kellogg R C and O’Hara N W 1975 Geophysical studies of basement geology of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan;Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 59 1562–1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl A E and Kennard R W 1970a Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems;Technometrics 12 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl A E and Kennard R W 1970b Ridge regression: Applications to nonorthogonal problems;Technometrics 12 69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman P F 1987 Continental transform tectonics: Great Slave Lake shear zone (ca. 1.9 Ga), northwest Canada;Geology 15 785–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson D D 1972 Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient, and inconsistent data;Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 28 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakosky J J 1949Exploration geophysics (Los Angeles: Trija Publishing Co.) 1195 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joesting H R 1941 Magnetometer and direct current resistivity studies in Alaska: A. I. M. E. Tech. Paper 1284

  • Keller G R, Smith R A, Hinze W J and Aiken C L V 1985 Regional gravity and magnetic study of west Texas. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 198–212

  • King E R and Zietz I 1978 The New York-Alabama lineament: Geophysical evidence for a major crustal break in the basement beneath the Appalachian basin;Geology 6 312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku C C 1977 A direct computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies caused by 2 and 3-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization by equivalent point method and a simplified cubic spline;Geophysics 42 610–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanczos C 1961Linear differential operators (New York: D Van Nostrand)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langel R A, Slud E V and Smith P J 1984 Reduction of satellite magnetic anomaly data;J. Geophys. 54 207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson C L and Hanson R J 1974Solving least squares problems (New York; Prentice-Hall)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leney G W 1966 Field studies in iron ore geophysics. In:Society of Exploration Geophysicists’ Mining Geophysics, 1, Case Histories (eds) D A Hansenet al, pp. 391–417

  • Lidiak E G, Hinze W J, Keller G R, Reed J E, Braile L W and Johnson R W 1985 Geologic significance of regional gravity and magnetic anomalies in the east-central Midcontinent. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 287–307

  • Lucius J E and von Frese R R B 1988 Aeromagnetic and gravity anomaly constraints on the crustal geology of Ohio;Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.,100 104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren A S and Charbonneau B W 1968 Characteristics of magnetic data over major subdivisions of the Canadian Shield;Gael. Assoc. Canada Proc. 19 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride J H and Nelson K D 1988 Integration of COCORP deep reflection and magnetic anomaly analysis in the southern United States: Implications for the origin of the Brunswick and East Coast magnetic anomalies;Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 100 436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew M A 1979 Inversion of satellite magnetic anomaly data;J. Geophys. 45 119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesko C A 1966 Two-dimensional filtering and the second derivative method;Geophysics 31 606–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi J G 1967 Convergence and divergence in downward continuation;Geophysics 32 867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton L L 1940Geophysical prospecting for oil (New York: McGraw-Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton L L 1942 Gravity and magnetic calculations;Geophysics 7 293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton L L 1954 Regionals, residuals and structures;Geophysics 19 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onesti L A and Hinze W J 1970 Magnetic observations over eskers in Michigan:Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81 3453–3456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham C H G and Sutherland D B 1955 Orthogonal polynomials and their use in estimating the regional effect;Geophysics 20 295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson N R and Reeves C V 1985 Application of gravity and magnetic surveys: The state-of-the-art in 1985;Geophysics 50 2558–2594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters L J 1949 The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application;Geophysics 14 290–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson L B 1979 Wavenumber domain methods for fast interpretation of potential field data;Geoexpl. 17 205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouff D 1976 Gravity and magnetic fields of polygonal prisms and application to magnetic terrain corrections;Geophysics 41 727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reford M S 1964 Magnetic anomalies over thin sheets;Geophysics 29 532–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reford M S 1986 Magnetic anomalies from the edge, dyke, and thin sheet. In:Interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies for non-specialists, (ed.) A K Goodacre, Notes for Can. Geophys. Union Short Course: (Geol. Surv. Canada) pp. 253–336

  • Reford M S and Sumner J S 1964 Aeromagnetics;Geophysics 29 482–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz E J and Wright N 1987 Buried placers in Chaudiere River sediments indicated by ground magnetometer survey, Eastern Townships, Quebec;Current Research, Part A, Geol. Surv. of Canada Paper 87-1 A, 423–428

  • Shuey R T and Pasquale A S 1973 End corrections in magnetic profile interpretation;Geophysics 38 507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeels D C 1967 What is residual gravity?;Geophysics 32 872–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R A 1959 Some depth formulae for local magnetic and gravity anomalies;Geophys. Prosp. 7 55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwani M 1965 Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape;Geophysics 30 791–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwani M and Heirtzler J R 1964 Computation of magnetic anomalies caused by two-dimensional structures of arbitrary shape;Stanford University Pub. Geol. Sciences 9 464–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P T, Zietz I and Dennis L S 1968 Geologic implications of aeromagnetic data for the eastern continental margin of the United States;Geophysics 33 755–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telford W M, Geldart L P, Sheriff R E and Keys D A 1976Applied geophysics (Cambridge: Univ. Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart W E S and Strangway D W 1985 Interpretation of part of an aeromagnetic survey in the Matagami area of Quebec. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 426–438

  • Vacquier V, Steenland N C, Henderson R G and Zietz I 1951 Interpretation of aeromagnetic maps;Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir 47

  • Van Schmus W R and Hinze W J 1985 The Midcontinent Rift System;Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 13 345–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schmus W R, Bickford M E and Zietz I 1987 Early and Middle Proterozoic provinces in the central United States. In:Proterozoic lithospheric evolution (ed.) A Kroner;Am. Geophys. Un. Geodynamics Series 17 43–68

  • von Frese R R B, Hinze W J and Braile L W 1981a Spherical earth gravity and magnetic anomaly analysis by equivalent point source inversion;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 53 69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frese R R B, Hinze W J, Braile L W and Luca A J 1981b Spherical earth gravity and magnetic anomaly modeling by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration;J. Geophys. 49 234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frese R R B, Ravat D N, Hinze W J and McGue C A 1988 Improved inversion of geopotential field anomales for lithospheric investigations;Geophysics 53 375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasilewski P J, Thomas H H and Mayhew M A 1979 The Moho as a magnetic boundary;Geophys. Res. Lett. 6 541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggens R 1972 The general linear inverse problem: implications of surface waves and free oscillations on earth structure;Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10 251–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarger H L 1985 Kansas basement study using spectrally filtered aeromagnetic data. In:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 213–232

  • Yunsheng S, Strangway D W and Urquhart WES 1985 Geological interpretation of a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey in the Amos-Barraute area of Quebec; in:The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps (ed.) W J Hinze (Soc. Exploration Geophysicists) pp. 413–425

  • Zurflueh E G 1967 Applications of two-dimensional linear wavelength filtering;Geophysics 32 1015–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

    William J. Hinze & Ralph R. B. Von Frese

  2. Department of Geology and Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Ralph R. B. Von Frese

Authors
  1. William J. Hinze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ralph R. B. Von Frese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinze, W.J., Von Frese, R.R.B. Magnetics in geoexploration. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet Sci.) 99, 515–547 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02840315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02840315

Keywords

Search

Navigation