Summary
Contemporary approaches to quantum field theory and gravitation often use a four-dimensional space-time manifold of Euclidean signature (which we call “hyperspace”) as a continuation of the Lorentzian metric. To investigate what physical sense this might have we review the history of Euclidean techniques in classical mechanics and quantum theory. Schwinger’s Euclidean postulate gives a fundamental significance to such techniques and leads to a clearer understanding of the TCP theorem in terms of space-time uniformity. This is closely related to the principle of identicality that characterizes non-relativistic quantum theory. In quantum gravity we suggest that the Hartle-Hawking treatment of the wave function of the universe rests on a notion of space-time uniformity which can be related to the Euclidean postulate as a kind of “perfect cosmological principle” on the unobservable wave function of the universe which eliminates anya priori asymmetry between space and time. Euclidean hyperspace may mediate between the infinite-dimensional Hubert space of quantum theory (whose metric is Euclidean) and the four-dimensional Lorentzian space-time of physical observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Schwinger:Particles, Sources, and Fields (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970 and 1973), 2 Vols.
P. D. Peśić:Am. J. Phys.,59, 971, 975 (1991); a paper considering arguments for the fundamentally of the principle of identicality is in preparation.
H. Goldstein:Am. J. Phys.,43, 737 (1975);44; 1123 (1976).
W. Pauli:Z. Phys.,36, 336 (1926).
See L. Schiff:Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 1968), pp. 234–239.
M. Bander andC. Itzykson:Rev. Mod. Phys.,38, 330, 346 (1966).
L. Flamm:Phys. Z,17, 448 (1916); seeJ. Eisenstaedt: inEinstein and the History of General Relativity, edited byD. Howard andJ. Stachel (Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 1989), pp. 237–238.
F. Bloch:Z. Phys.,74, 295 (1932).
G. C. Wick:Phys. Rev.,96, 1124 (1954).
J. Schwinger:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sei USA,44, 223, 956 (1958).
S. W. Hawking:Phys. Rev. D,37, 904 (1988).
A. Anderson andB. DeWitt: inBetween Quantum and Cosmos, edited byW. H. Zurek, A. van der Meerwe andW. A. Miller (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1988), pp. 76–77.
A. Folacci:Phys. Rev. D,46, 2553 (1992).
P. O. Mazur andE. Mottola:Nucl Phys. B,341, 187 (1990).
G. F. R. Ellis:Gen. Rel. Grav.,24, 1047 (1992).
T. Dereli andR. W. Tucker:Class. Quantum Gran,10, 365 (1993).
J. B. Hartle andS. W. Hawking:Phys. Rev. D,28, 2960 (1983).
R. F. Streater andA. S. Wightman:PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That (W. A. Benjamin, New York, N.Y., 1964), p. 9 and ff.; see alsoR. P. Feynman:Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), p. 8 and ff.
J. Schwinger:Particles, Sources, and Fields, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970 and 1973), Vol. 1, p. 42.
J. Schwinger:Particles, Sources, and Fields, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970 and 1973), Vol.1, p. 44; note that Schwinger uses the term “Minkowskian” for the space-time which we will call “Lorentzian”, following what seems to be the more prevalent usage.
J. Schwinger:Particles, Sources, and Fields, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970 and 1973), Vol. 1, p. 47.
P. Roman:Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1969), p. 382–387.
J. Schwinger:Particles, Sources, and Fields, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970 and 1973), Vol. 1, pp. 111–113, 139–140.
E. Cartan:The Theory of Spinors (Dover, New York, N.Y., 1961), pp. 114–116.
E. Cartan:The Theory of Spinors (Dover, New York, N.Y., 1961), pp. 130–132.
D. Hestenes:Spacetime Algebra (Gordon and Breach, New York, N.Y., 1966);D. Hestenes:Am. J. Phys.,39, 1013 (1971);W. E. Baylis, J. Huschlit andJiansu Wei:Am. J. Phys.,60, 788 (1992).
H. Bondi:Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988), pp. 11–15, 65–74.
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne andJ. A. Wheeler:Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Cal., 1973), p. 745.
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne andJ. A. Wheeler:Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Cal., 1973), pp. 429–431.
S. W. Hawking: inRecent Developments in Gravitation, edited byM. Levy andS. Deser (Plenum, New York, N.Y., 1979), pp. 146–147.
R. Bonola:Non-Euclidean Geometry (Dover, New York, N.Y., 1955), p. 164.
M. J. Greenberg:Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries (W. H. Freeman, New York, N.Y., 1980), pp. 177 and ff., 237 and ff.
H. Minkowki inH. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski andH. Weyl:The Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York, N.Y., 1923), p. 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pešić, P.D. Euclidean hyperspace and its physical significance. Nuov Cim B 108, 1145–1153 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02827310
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02827310