Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic structure in two meadow varieties ofEuphrasia stricta on the Baltic island of Gotland (Sweden) and implications for conservation

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The annual hemiparasiteEuphrasia stricta occurs on Gotland in two early-flowering meadow varieties.E. stricta var.suecica is on the Swedish red-list as endangered, occurring in Sweden only on the Baltic island of Gotland. It probably has near relatives east of the Baltic proper. The other variety,E. stricta var.tenuis, has a wider distribution occurring almost all over Sweden, but is declining in abundance. Both varieties have close morphological similarities and habitat preferences, raising questions about which level conservation efforts should be focused on, varieties or populations. In this study we describe the genetic structure between and within these two varieties using amplified fragment length polymorphism, AFLP.F ST between varieties is 0.14, and between populations within the varietiesE. stricta var.suecica and var.tenuis F ST is 0.60 and 0.26 respectively. The partitioning of gene diversity to different levels shows that 14% of the genetic diversity occurs between varieties, 42% between populations within varieties, and 44% within populations. Significant genetic differentiation was detected between varieties, populations and subpopulations within populations using a constrained principal coordinate analysis.

We suggest that all of the existing populations of these two varieties on Gotland should be preserved, since they are few (6E. stricta var.suecica and 5E. stricta var.tenuis) and much of the genetic diversity is partitioned between populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altizer S., Harvell D. &Friedle E. (2003): Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity.Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barett S. &Kohn J. (1991): Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation. In:Falk D.A. &Holsinger K.E. (eds.),Genetics and conservation of rare plants, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensch S., Helbig A.J., Salomon M. &Siebold I. (2002): Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis identifies hybrids between two subspecies of warblers.Molec. Ecol. 11: 473–481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booth R.E. &Grime J.P. (2003): Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity.J. Ecol. 91: 721–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booy G., Hendriks R.J.J., Smulders M.J.M., van Groenendael J.M. &Vosman B. (2000): Genetic diversity and the survival of populations.Pl. Biol. 2: 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty R., Haag M., Ryman N. &Stahl G. (1982): Hierarchical gene diversity analysis and its applications to brown trout population data.Hereditas 97: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins S.A.O., Lavorel S. &Davies I. (2003): Modelling the effects of landscape pattern and grazing regimes on the persistence of plant species with high conservation value in grasslands in south-eastern Sweden.Landscape Ecol. 18: 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstam U., Aronsson M. &Forshed N. (1988):Ängar. Om naturliga slattermarker i odlingslandskapet (Natural hayfields). LTs förlag, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand N.C. &Elam D.R. (1993): Population genetic consequences of small population size — Implications for plant conservation.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O., Cousins S.A.O. &Bruun H.H. (2002): Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 743–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. (1993):PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S., Rohlf F.J. &Koehn R.K. (1985): Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines.Syst. Zool. 34: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M., Husi R., Prati D., Peintinger M., van Kleunen M. &Schmid B. (2000): RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plantRanunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1128–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M. &Matthies D. (1998): RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rareGentianella germanica (Gentianaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 85: 811–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S.F., Poschlod P. &Beinlich B. (1996): Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands.J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1206–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredén C. (1994):National atlas of Sweden, Geology. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U. (ed.) (2000):The 2000 redlist of Swedish species. Swedish Species Information Centre, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooftman D.A.P., van Kleunen M. &Diemer M. (2003): Effects of habitat fragmentation on the fitness of two common wetland species,Carex davalliana andSuccisa pratensis.Oecologia 134: 350–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hufford K.M. &Mazer S.J. (2003): Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration.Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E. &Fries M. (1986):Atlas of North European vascular plants: north of the Tropic of Cancer 2. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen T.H. (2002): The importance of phylogeny and ecology in microgeographical variation in the morphology of four Canarian species ofAeonium (Crassulaceae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson T. (1984): Early-flowering taxa ofEuphrasia (Scrophulariaceae) on Gotland, Sweden.Nordic J. Bot. 4: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson T. (1986): The evolutionary situation ofEuphrasia in Sweden.Acta Univ. Upsal., Symb. Bot. Upsal. 27: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson T. (1992):Euphrasia stricta var.suecica. Swedish Species Information Centre, Species fact sheets. 2003-10-20, http://www.artdata.slu.se.

  • Krok T.O.B.N. &Almquist S. (revised byJonsell L. & Jonsell B.) (2001):Svensk Flora (Swedish Flora). Liber, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. (2002): Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlation and partial Mantel tests.J. Statist. Comp. Simul. 67: 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson T. (2002): Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations.Ecology 83: 3060–3072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D.A. (1981): Dispersal versus gene flow in plants.Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 68: 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert J., Fischer M., Schneller J. &Diemer M. (2002): Isozyme variability of the wetland specialistSwertia perennis (Gentianaceae) in relation to habitat size, isolation, and plant fitness.Amer. J. Bot. 89: 801–811.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lönn M. (1993): Genetic structure and allozyme microhabitat associations inBromus hordeaceus.Oikos 68: 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M., Rekolainen S., Aakkula J. &Pykala J. (2003): Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland.Ambio 32: 447–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M. &Milligan B.G. (1994): Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers.Molec. Ecol. 3: 91–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N. (1967): The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.Cancer Res. 27: 200–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsson M. (1999):Böisårkar u daldargras — naturvärden och vård i gotländska odlingslandskap (Natural values in the rural landscape of Gotland). Länsstyrelsen i Gotlands Län, Visby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myklestad A. &Saetersdal M. (2003): Effects of reforestation and intensified land use on vascular plant species richness in traditionally managed hay meadows.Ann. Bot. Fenn. 40: 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. (1978): Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.Genetics 89: 583–590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J. (2004):VEGAN: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.6–5. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/

  • Page R.D.M. (1996): TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers.Comp. Appl. Biosc. 12: 357–358.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson J. (1999): {Hotade växter pa Gotland. Del 2: sarbara arter} (Threatend plants on Gotland. Part 2: vulnerable species).Rindi 2–3: 59–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J.K., Stephens M. &Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.Genetics 155: 945–959.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J.K. & Wen W. (2003):Documentation for STRUCTURE software: Version 2. http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html.

  • Reed D.H. &Frankham R. (2003): Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity.Conservation Biol. 17: 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004):R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid B. (1994): Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands ofSolidago altissima — Evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations.J. Ecol. 82: 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K. &Jensen K. (2000): Genetic structure and AFLP variation of remnant populations in the rare plantPedicularis palustris (Scrophulariaceae) and its relation to population size and reproductive components.Amer. J. Bot. 87: 678–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M.E. (1973): The epistasis cycle: a theory of marginal populations.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E. &Sykes M.T. (1993): Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: The carousel model and some comments on the niche concept.J. Veg. Sci. 4: 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans X. (2002):AFLP-SURV version 1.0. Distributed by the author. Laboratoire de Génétique et Ecologie Végétales, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables W.N. &Ripley B.D. (2002):Modern applied statistics with S. Ed. 4. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergeer P., Rengelink R., Copal A. &Ouborg N.J. (2003): The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance ofSuccisa pratensis.J. Ecol. 19: 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M. &Zabeau M. (1995): AFLP — a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting.Nucl. Acid. Res. 23: 4407–4414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein von R. (1896): Monographie der GattungEuphrasia. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1943): Isolation by distance.Genetics 28: 114–138.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhivotovsky L.A. (1999): Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers.Molec. Ecol. 8: 907–913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Biology, Geography and Environmental Science, Södertörns Högskola, SE-141 89, Huddinge, Sweden

    Anna-Karin Kolseth & Mikael Lönn

  2. Department of Plant Ecology, Uppsala University, Villavägen 14, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Anna-Karin Kolseth & Brita M. Svensson

Authors
  1. Anna-Karin Kolseth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Lönn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brita M. Svensson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolseth, AK., Lönn, M. & Svensson, B.M. Genetic structure in two meadow varieties ofEuphrasia stricta on the Baltic island of Gotland (Sweden) and implications for conservation. Folia Geobot 40, 163–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803232

Keywords

Search

Navigation