Skip to main content
Log in

Economic development and population

  • Development Research
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Neo-Malthusian analysis that high and increasing population density hinders economic development and results in poverty has been demonstrated to be false. The two major structural variables negatively associated with rate of population increase are wealth and socialism, and the major determinants of economic growth are level of economic development and economic organization.

If our analysis is correct the various campaigns supported by AID, the major U.S. foundations and other groups to discourage population growth in Third World countries in order to increase their rate of economic growth are misguided. Every baby born is not only a new mouth to feed, but also within a few years two more hands to work. There are great potentialities for economic growth in the Third World that await only the proper economic organization to be realized. That is, if the two hands are used efficiently, they will more than feed themselves.

Attempts to reduce the birth rate by propaganda and making contraceptives readily available, ignore the structural causes of high fertility and so are not likely to succeed in reducing the birth rate. Our data suggest that only when the structural causes of high fertility—the poverty and economic insecurity associated with capitalism—are removed is the birth rate likely to fall significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BORGSTROM, GEORGE 1967 The Hungry Planet. London: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASTRO, JOSUE DE 1952 The Geography of Hunger. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMBS, JERRY W., JR., and KINGSLEY DAVIS 1951 “Differential Fertility in Puerto Rico.” Population Studies 5 (November).

  • COOK, ROBERT 1951 Human Fertility: The Modern Dilemma. New York: William Sloane Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, KINGSLEY 1965 “The Population Impact on Children in the World’s Agrarian Countries.” Population Review 9 (January–July).

  • DAY, LINCOLN H. 1967 “The Population Problem in the U.S.” In Daniel O. Price (ed.), The Population Crisis in the U.S. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EHRLICH, PAUL R., and ANNE H. EHRLICH 1970 Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MALTHUS, THOMAS 1959 Population: The First Essay. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Paperbacks.

  • MARTIN, WALTER n.d. (Unpublished tabulations on Kenya).

  • OJO, A.O. 1968 “Male Factors in Infertile Marriages in Nigeria.” The West African Medical Journal 17 (December).

  • PADDOCK, WILLIAM, and PAUL PADDOCK 1967 Famine 1975: America’s Decision, Who Will Survive. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTS, G.W., and L. BRAITHWART 1959 “Fertility Differentials in Trinidad.” Vienna: International Population Conference no. 16.

  • STYCOS, J. MAYONE 1961 “Social Class and Differential Fertility in Peru,” New York: International Population Conference, Book Two.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOGT, WILLIAM 1948 Road to Survival. New York: William Sloane Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZARATE, ALVAN O. 1967 “Differential Fertility in Monterrey, Mexico.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 45, part 1, (April).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szymanski, A. Economic development and population. St Comp Int Dev 9, 53–69 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800439

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800439

Keywords

Navigation