Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nutrient limitation in the lower Housatonic River estuary

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most serious threats to freshwater and marine ecosystems is high rates of anthropogenic nutrient loading, particularly nitrogen (N) and phophorus (P). One of the major freshwater sources of nutrients to Long Island Sound (LIS) is the Housatonic River (HR). Current management plans that call for reducing N inputs without reducing P inputs may change the N: P ratio in the water column and the pattern of algal nutrient limitation and species composition in the tidal portion of the river. To assess the current pattern of algal nutrient limitation in the HR estuary, nutrient bioassays were conducted in spring, summer, and fall at 5 sites throughout the tidal portion and adjacent LIS. Diatoms were a dominant taxon at all sites throughout the sampling period. Other seasonally important taxa include cyanobacteria, cryptophytes, and euglenoids. Phytoplankton in LIS were always strongly N limited and were co-limited by P in spring. During low flow (summer), phytoplankton in the lower HR estuary were N limited. Phytoplankton in the middle reaches showed no evidence of N or P limitation and were likely limited by other factors. In spring, phytoplankton in the upper HR estuary were P limited. Periods of N or P limitation were better correlated with periods of lower concentrations of nitrate or phosphate than with differences in N: P ratio. These results suggest that decreases in N concentration could increase the prevalence of N limitation throughout the estuary that in turn may reduce phytoplankton biomass and alter species composition of the phytoplankton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alpine, A. E. andJ. E. Cloern. 1988. Phytoplankton growth rates in a light-limited environment, San Francisco Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 44:167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvaud, L., F. Jean, O. Ragueneau, andG. Thouzeau. 2000. Long-term variation of the Bay of Brest ecosystem: Benthicpelagic coupling revisited.Marine Ecology Progress Series 200:35–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E.. 1999. The relative importance of light and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth: A simple index of coastal ecosystem sensitivity to nutrient enrichment.Aquatic Ecology 33:3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem.Marine Ecology Progress Series 210:223–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. J. 2000. Biogeochemical and nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies.Hydrobiologia 410:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. J. andT. C. Malone. 1992. Annual cycle of dissolved silicate in Chesapeake Bay: Implications for the production and fate of phytoplankton biomass.Marine Ecology Progress Series 81: 121–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) and New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). 2000. A total maximum daily load analysis to achieve water quality standards for dissolved oxygen in Long Island Sound. CTDEP and NYDEC, Hartford, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, P. H., C. A. Oviatt, B. L. Nowicki, E. G. Klos andL. W. Reed. 1995. Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of primary production in a simulated estuarine gradient.Marine Ecology Progress Series 124:271–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dortch, Q. andT. E. Whitledge. 1992. Does nitrogen or silicon limit phytoplankton production in the Mississippi River plume and nearby regions?Continental Shelf Research 12:1293–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guildford, S. J. andR. E. Hecky. 2000. total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: Is there a common relationship?Limnology and Oceanography 45: 1213–1223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmboe, N., H. S. Jensen, andF. O. Andersen. 1999. Nutrient addition bioassays as indicators of nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a eutrophic estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 186:95–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W. 1988. Nitrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irigoien, X. andJ. Castel. 1997. light limitation and distribution of chlorophyll pigments in a highly turbid estuary: The Gironde (SW France).Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 44:507–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Justic, D., N. N. Rabalais, andR. E. Turner. 2002. Modeling the impacts of decadal changes in riverine nutrient fluxes on the coastal eutrophication near the Mississippi River Delta.Ecological Modelling 152:33–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilham, S. S. andP. Kilham. 1975.Melosira granulata (EHR.) RALFS: Morphology and ecology of a cosmopolitan freshwater diatom.Verhandlungen des Internationalen Vereins zur Limnologie 19:2716–2721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilham, P., S. S. Kilham, andR. E. Hecky. 1986. Hypothesized resource relationships among African planktonic diatoms.Limnology and Oceanography 31:1169–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocum, E., D. B. Nedwell, andG. J. C. Underwood. 2002. Regulation of phytoplankton primary production along a hypernutrified estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 231:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., L. B. Cahoon, M. R. McIver, D. C. Parsons, andG. C. Shank. 1999. Alternation of factors limiting phytoplankton production in the Cape Fear River Estuary.Estuaries 22:825–836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, E., S. Badylak, andT. Grosskopf. 2002. Factors affecting the abundance of phytoplankton in a restricted subtropical lagoon, the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 55:385–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piehler, M. F., J. Dyble, P. H. Moisander, J. L. Pinckney, andH. W. Paerl. 2002. Effects of modified nutrient concentrations and ratios of the structure and function of the native phytoplankton community in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA.Aquatic Ecology 36:371–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N., E. Turner, andW. J. Wiseman Jr. 2002. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. “The dead zone”.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. andB. B. Jorgensen. 1996. Eutrophication: Definition, history, and effects, p. 1–19.In B. B. Jorgensen and K. Richardson (eds.) Eutrophication in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S. C., S. J. Benyi, andC. J. Strobel. 1999. An assessment of the ecological condition of Long Island Sound, 1990–1993.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 56:27–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. W. 1977. Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes.Science 195:260–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, B. S., I. T. Webster, G. J. Jones, andR. L. Oliver. 1998. Transitions betweenAulacoseira andAnabaena dominance in a turbid river weir pool.Limnology and Oceanography 43:1902–1915.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. H. 1982. Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue-green algae in lake phytoplankton.Science 221:669–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. S. 1998. The transport of nitrogen and the residence time of water in the Housatonic River estuary. M. S. Thesis, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., S. S. Kilham, andP. Kilham. 1982. Phytoplankton community ecology: The role of limiting nutrients.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utermohl, H. 1958. Zur vervollkommnung der quantitativen phytoplankton-methodik.Mitteilungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Limnologie 9:1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welschmeyer, N. A. 1994. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophylla in the presence of chlorophyllb and pheopigments.Limnology and Oceanography 39:1985–1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. 2001. Limnology, 3rd edition. Academic Press. San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. andG. E. Likens. 2000. Limnological Analyses, 3rd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, B. A. and M. Potts (eds.) 2000. The Ecology of Cyanobacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Source of Unpublished Materials

  • Sedlack, E. unpublished data. Biology Department, Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06824.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Fairfield University, 06824, Fairfield, Connecticut

    Jennifer L. Klug

Authors
  1. Jennifer L. Klug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Klug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klug, J.L. Nutrient limitation in the lower Housatonic River estuary. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 29, 831–840 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786534

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786534

Keywords

Search

Navigation