Abstract
We consider the problem of lower bounding the Minkowski content of subsets of a convex body with a log-concave probability measure, conditioned on the set size. A bound is given in terms of diameter and set size, which is sharp for all set sizes, dimensions, and norms. In the case of uniform density a stronger theorem is shown which is also sharp.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. G. Bobkov,Isoperimetric and analytic inequalities for log-concave probability measures, Annals of Probability27 (1999), 1903–1921.
B. Bollobás and I. Leader,Edge-isoperimetric inequalities in the grid, Combinatorica11 (1991), 299–314.
C. Borell,The Brunn-Minkowski inequality in Gauss space, Inventiones Mathematicae30 (1975), 207–216.
C. Borell,Convex set functions in d-space, Periodica Mathematica Hungarica6 (1975), 111–136.
M. Dyer and A. Frieze,Computing the volume of convex bodies: A case where randomness probably helps, Symposium on Applied Mathematics44 (1991), 123–169.
R. Kannan, L. Lovász and R. Montenegro,Blocking conductance and mixing in random walks, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, to appear.
R. Kannan, L. Lovász and M. Simonovits,Isoperimetric problems for convex bodies and a localization lemma, Discrete and Computational Geometry13 (1995), 541–559.
L. Lovász and M. Simonovits,Random walks in a convex body and an improved volume algorithm, Random Structures and Algorithms4 (1993), 359–412.
V. N. Sudakov and B. S. Cirel’son,Extremal properties of half-spaces for spherically invariant measures (Russian) Problems in the theory of probability distributions, II, Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov Leningrad. Otdelenie. Matematicheskii Institut im V. A. Steklova (LOMI)41 (1974), 14–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported in part by VIGRE grants at Yale University and the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montenegro, R. A sharp isoperimetric bound for convex bodies. Isr. J. Math. 153, 267–284 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771786
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771786