Skip to main content
Log in

An individual-based model for competingDrosophila populations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract

An individual-based model forDrosophila is formulated, based on competition amongst larvae consuming the same batch of food. The predictions of the model are supported by data for single speciesDrosophila populations reared in the laboratory. The model is used to build a simple discrete model for the dynamics ofDrosophila populations that are kept over a number of generations. The dynamics of a single species is shown to give either a stable equilibrium or fluctuations which can be periodic or chaotic. When the dynamics of a species in the absence of the other is periodic or chaotic, we found coexistence or two alternative states, on neither of which the species can coexist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, F. R. (1990) Coexistence of two types on a single resource in discrete time.Journal of Mathematical Biology 28: 695–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, R. A. and R. McGehee (1976) Coexistence of species competing for shared resources.Theoretical Population Biology 9: 317–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J. (1969) Experimental invalidation of the principle of competitive exclusion.Nature 224: 1076–1079.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (1959) Feeding period, growth and pupation in larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2: 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (1961) An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster.Archives Néerlandaises de Zöologie 2: 250–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. (1976) A model of competition for food. I. Frequency dependent viabilities.American Naturalist 110: 1013–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, G., L. Hemerik and J. J. M. Van Alphen (1990)Drosophila species breeding in the stinkhornPhallus impudicus pers. and their larval parasitoids.Netherlands Journal of Zoology 40: 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E., M. P. Carpenter and M. J. Pomerantz (1986) The assembly of a laboratory community: multispecies competition inDrosophila. pp. 23–40. In J. Diamond and T. D. Case (eds.)Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, E. A. (1991)Perspectives of nonlinear dynamics, Vol.2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khibnik, A. I., Y. A. Kuznetsov, V. V. Levitin and E. V. Nikolaev (1993) Continuation techniques and interactive software for bifurcation analysis of ODEs and iterated maps.Physica D 62: 360–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1986) Regulation of populations with nonoverlapping generations by microparasites: a purely chaotic system.American Naturalist 125: 573–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J.A. J. and O. Diekmann (1986)The dynamics of physiologically structured populations, Volume 96 of Lect. Notes in Biomath. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. and W. Arthur (1990) Resource turnover time and consumer generation time as factors affecting the stability of coexistence: an experiment withDrosophila.Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, L. D. (1988) Density-dependent population growth and natural selection in food-limited environments: theDrosophila model.American Naturalist 132: 786–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, L. D. and P. T. Huynh (1994) Ecological determinants of stability in model populations.Ecology 75: 430–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., E. McCauley, R. M. Nisbet, W. S. C. Gurney and A. M. De Roos (1992) Individual based models: combining testability and generality, pp. 18–35. In D. L. DeAngelis and J. L. Gross (eds.)Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: populations, communities and ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney, L. (1983) Sex differences in larval competition inDrosophila melanogaster. the testing of a competition model and its relevance to frequency dependent selection.American Naturalist 121: 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusse, H. and J. Yorke (1994)Dynamics: numerical explorations. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, T. E., M. P. Carpenter, T. J. Case and M. E. Gilpin (1987)Drosophila population dynamics: chaos and extinction.Ecology 68: 154–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., W. Atkinson and P. Charlesworth (1979) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource.Journal of Animal Ecology 48: 899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., J. Rosewell, K. Edwards and W. Atkinson (1984) Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities.Nature 310: 310–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and J. G. Sevenster (1995) Explaining local speciesdiversity.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 260: 305–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent A. A. Jansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansen, V.A.A., Sevenster, J.G. An individual-based model for competingDrosophila populations. Res Popul Ecol 39, 215–225 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765268

Key words

Navigation