Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Calculated substantiation of the method of strengthening the Moscow Canal lock chamber walls with prestressed reinforcing members

  • Reconstruction and Modernization of Hydro Developments
  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The developed method of strengthening lock chamber walls based on the use of prestressed beam members was substantiated by comprehensive calculations.

  2. 2.

    The proposed method was realized successfully during strengthening and repair of the chamber walls of lock No. 1 of the Moscow Canal (sections No. 1–15).

  3. 3.

    On-site observations of the behavior of the structures after their strengthening showed a substantial decrease of seasonal displacements of the lock walls and cessation of slipping of fragments of the walls into the chamber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Precast and Cast-in-Situ Structures of Administrative Buildings (France),” in:Éksp. Info. Ser. Zhilishch. Grazhd. Stroit. Arikhitekt., TsNIIS, Moscow, No. 34 (1965).

  2. É. G. Ratts, “Reinforced-concrete structures reinforced with long-line tensioned members,”Beton Zhelezobeton, No. 3 (1957).

  3. “The Bison plank floor system,”Contractors Record and Municipal Engineering, No. 28, 29 (1955).

  4. A. N. Stul'chikov, V. F. Tabakov, B. I. Aizik, and S. I. Kirkhshstein, “Massive precast and cast-in-situ structures reinforced with prestressed members,”Beton Zhelezobeton, No. 4 (1978).

  5. V. E. Ni, “Supervision of the reliability and safety of hydraulic structures of the Moscow Canal,”Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 6, 1987.

  6. V. E. Ni,Determination of Stresses in Retaining Walls of Hydraulic Structures [in Russian], Transport, Moscow (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. SNiP 2.06.07-87. Retaining Walls, Navigation Locks, Fish Passes and Fish Protective Structures [in Russian], TsITP Gosstroya SSSR, Moscow (1987).

  8. SNiP 2.03.01-84. Concrete and Reinforced-Concrete Members [in Russian], TsITP Gosstroya SSSR, Moscow (1985).

  9. SNiP 2.06.08-87. Concrete and Reinforced-Concrete Members of Hydraulic Structures [in Russian], TsITP Gosstroya SSSR, Moscow (1987).

  10. Guide to the Design of Prestressed Reinforced-Concrete members of Heavy and Light Concretes (Appendix to SNiP 2.03.01-84), TsITP Gosstroya SSSR, Moscow, 1988.

Download references

Authors
  1. Yu. A. Il’in
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 4, pp. 17–21, April, 1999.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Il’in, Y.A. Calculated substantiation of the method of strengthening the Moscow Canal lock chamber walls with prestressed reinforcing members. Hydrotechnical Construction 33, 208–214 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764508

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764508

Keywords

Search

Navigation