Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal basis of recurrent fetal losses

  • Symposium: Medical Genetics
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome abnormalities constitute the single most etiological factor in spontaneous abortions and other fetal losses and include sporadic chromosome abnormalities such as monosomy, trisomy, triploidy, tetraploidy and chromosomal mosaicism. These errors either originate during gametogenesis or after fertilization during the early zygotic divisions. Based upon the information now available it is apparent that if a couple has had two fetal losses, the karyotypes of the abortuses are most likely to be concordant either both being normal or both being abnormal. Fetal losses may also be due to a chromosome abnormality carried by a parent in a clinically silent form such as a balanced translocation. A compilation of cytogenetic data from 17,112 parents (8,743 females and 8,369 males) revealed 517 instances of chromosome abnormalities, an incidence of 3 per cent (6% of couples). Approximately 50 per cent of all chromosome abnormalities detected were balanced reciprocal translocations, followed by balanced Robertsonian translocations (23%) and sex chromosome mosaicism in females (14%). Parental chromosome abnormalities are known to be factors in abnormal gametogenesis and zygote formation, and, therefore, prenatal diagnosis should be considered in future pregnancies. Further, even when parental karyotypes are normal, prenatal diagnosis should be offered to couples who have had two or more fetal losses due to their increased risk of having a fetus with a chromosome abnormality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tharapel AT, Tharapel SA, Bannerman RM. Recurrent pregnancy losses and parental chromosome abnormalitiess a review.Br J Obstat Gynecol 1985;92: 899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boué J, Boué A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions.Teratology 1975;12: 11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lauritsen JG. Aetiology of spontaneous abortion: A cytogenetic and epidemiological study of 288 abortuses and their patients.Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1976; (Suppl)52: 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kajii T, Ferrier A, Niikawa N, Takahara H, Ohama K, Tharapel AT. Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses.Hum Genet 1980;55: 87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J Jooss T, Manual B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane Jacobs PA. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions.Ann hum Genet 1980;44: 115

    Google Scholar 

  6. Penrose LS, Delhanty JDA. Triploid cell cultures from a macerated foetus.Lancet 1961;1: 1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delhanty JDA, Ellis JR, Rowley PT. Triploid cells in a human embryo.Lancet 1961; i: 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Niebuhr E. Triploidy in man. Cytogenetic and clinical aspects.Hum Genet 1974; 21: 103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Niikawa N, Kajii T. A troploid human abortus due to dispermy.Hum Genet: 1975;24: 261

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kajii T., Niikawa N. Origin of triploidy and tetraploidy in man: 11 cases with chromosome markers.Cytogenet cell Genet 1977;18: 109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs PA, Hassold TJ. The origin of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortion. In: Porter IH, Hook EB ed.Human embryonic and fetal death. New York; Academic Press, 1980; 289

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boué J, Boué A. Chromosomal analysis of two consecutive abortuses in each of 43 women.Hum Genet 1973;19: 275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Albertman E, Elliott M, Creasy M, Dhadial R. Previous reproductive history in mothers presenting with spontaneous abortions.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kajii T, Ferrier A. Cytogenetics of aborters and abortuses.Amer J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131: 33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassold TJ. A cytogenetic study of repeated spontaneous abortions.Amer J Human Genet 1980;32: 723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lippman-Hand A. Genetic counselling and human reproductive loss. In: Porter IH, Hook EB ed.Human Embryonic and Fetal Death. New York; Academic Press 1980; 289

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson JL. Repeated suboptimal pregnancy outcome.Birth Defects: Original Article Series 1981;17: 113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hook EB, Cross PK. Spontaneous abortion and subsequent Down syndrome livebirth.Hum Genet 1983;64: 267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Penrose LS, Ellis JR, Delhanty JDA. Chromosomal translocations in mongolism and in normal relations.Lancet 1960;ii: 409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soh K, Yajima A, Ozawa N, Abe Y, Takabayashi T, Sato S, Sou S, Suzuki M. Chromosome analysis in couples with recurrent abortions.Tohoku J Exp Med 1984;144: 151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sachs ES, Jahoda MGJ, van Hemel JO, Hoogeboom AJM, Sandkuyl LA. Chromosome studies of 500 couples with two or more abortions.Obstet Gynecol 1985;65: 375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Court-Brown WM.Human Population Cytogenetics. North-Holland. Amsterdam, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kirkels VGHJ, Hustinx Th WJ, Scheres JMIC. Habitual abortion and (22q; 22q): Unexpected transmission from a mother to her phenotypically normal daughter.Clin Genet 1980;18: 456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer CG, Schwartz S, Hodes ME. Transmission of a balanced homologous t (22q; 22q) translocation from mother to normal daughter.Clin Genet 1980;17: 418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bishun NP, Morton WRM. Chromosome studies on women who have had two or more unsuccessful pregnancies.J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Cwlth 1968;75: 66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh DN, Hara S, Foster HW, Grimes EM. Reproductive performance in women with sex chromosome mosaicism.Obstet Gynecol 1980;55: 608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoll C. Cytogenetic findings in 122 couples with recurrent abortions.Hum Genet 1981;57: 101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hecht F. Unexpected encounters in cytogenetics: Repeated abortions and parental sex chromosome mosaicism may indicate risk of non-disjunction.Amer J Hum Genet 1982;34: 514

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dewhurst J. Fertility in 47, XXX and 45, X patients.J Med Genet 1978;15: 132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Khudi G. Cytogenetics of habitual abortion. A review.Obstet Gynec Surv 1974;29: 299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abuelo DN, Barsel-Bowers G. Prognosis for couples who have experienced repeated pregnancy loss.Fertil Steril 1983;40: 844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uchida IA, Freeman VCP. Trisomy 21 Down syndrome: Parental mosaicism.Hum Genet 1985;70: 246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hsu LYF, Gertner M, Leiter E, Hirschhorn K. Parental trisomy 21 mosaicism and Down’s syndrome.Amer J Hum Genet 1971; 23: 592

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Harris DJ, Begleiter ML, Chamberlin J, Hankins L, Magenis RE. Parental trisomy 21 mosaicism.Amer J Hum Genet 1982;34: 125

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wentz AC, Wilroy RS, Marten PR. Luteal phase inadequacy and a chromosomal anomaly in recurrent abortions.Fertil Steril 1984;41: 142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tharapel, A.T., Wilroy, R.S. Chromosomal basis of recurrent fetal losses. Indian J Pediatr 53, 461–470 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749527

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749527

Key words

Navigation