Skip to main content
Log in

Relaxation techniques for strictly convex network problems

  • II. Mathematical Programming
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gauss—Seidel type relaxation techniques are applied in the context of strictly convex pure networks with separable cost functions. The algorithm is an extension of the Bertsekas—Tseng approach for solving the linear network problem and its dual as a pair of monotropic programming problems. The method is extended to cover the class of generalized network problems. Alternative internal tactics for the dual problem are examined. Computational experiments —aimed at the improved efficiency of the algorithm — are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Ahlfeld, R.S. Dembo, J.M. Mulvey and S.A. Zenios, Nonlinear programming on generalized networks, Engineering Management Systems Working Paper, Princeton University (1985).

  2. D.P. Bertsekas and M.E. Gafni, Projected Newton methods and optimization of multicommodity flows, IEEE Trans, of Automatic Control, Vol. AC-28, No. 12 (1983).

  3. D.P. Bertsekas and P. Tseng, Relaxation methods for minimum cost network flow problems, MIT Report LIDS-P-1339 (1983).

  4. D.P. Bertsekas and D. El Baz, Distributed asynchronous relaxation methods for convex network flow problems, MIT Report LIDS-P-1417 (1984).

  5. G. Birkhoff and J.B. Diaz, Nonlinear network problems, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 13(1956)431.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.G. Brown and R.D. McBride, Solving generalized networks, Management Science 30, 12(1984).

  7. R.S. Dem bo and J.G. Klincewicz, A scaled reduced gradient algorithm for network flow problems with convex separable costs, Mathematical Programming Studies 15(1981)125.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.S. Dembo, A primal truncated Newton algorithm for large-scale nonlinear network optimization, Yale School of Organization and Management Working Paper, Series B 72 (1983).

  9. R.S. Dembo,NLPNET User’s Manual, Version 3 (School of Organization and Management, Yale University, 1983).

  10. F. Glover, J. Hultz, D. Klingman and J. Stutz, Generalized networks: A fundamental computer-based planning tool, Management Science 24, 12(1972)171.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.W. Hearn, S. Lawphongpanich and J.A. Ventura, Restricted simplicial decomposition: Computation and extension, Research Report No. 84-38, University of Florida, Gainesville (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.A. Holloway, An extension of the Frank-Wolfe method of feasible directions, Mathematical Programming 6, 1(1974)14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.L. Kennington and R.V. Helgason,Algorithms for Network Programming (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Klingman, A. Napier and J. Stutz, NETGEN — A program for generating large-scale (un)capacitated assignment, transportation, and minimum cost flow network problems, Management Science 20(1974)814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L.S. Lasdon,Optimization Theory for Large Systems (McMillan Series in Operations Research, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.G. Luenberger,Linear and Nonlinear Programming (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.M. Mulvey, Pivot strategies for primal-simplex network codes, Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery 25, 2(1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.M. Mulvey and S. Zenios, Solving large-scale generalized networks, Journal of Information and Optimization Science 6(1985)95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ohuchi and I. Kaji, Lagrangian dual coordinatewise maximization algorithm for network transportation problems with quadratic costs, Networks 14(1984)515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.M. Ortega and W.C. Reinboldt,Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (Academic Press, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.T. Rockafellar, Monotropic programming: Descent algorithms and duality,in: Nonlinear Programming 4, ed. O.L. Mangasarian, R. Meyer and S. Robinson (Academic Press, New York, 1981) p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.T. Rockafellar,Network Rows and Monotropic Programming (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. T.E. Stern, A class of decentralized routing algorithms using relaxation, IEEE Trans, on Communications, Vol. COM-25, No. 10 (1977).

  25. S.A. Zenios and J.M. Mulvey, Simulation of distributed synchronous relaxation techniques for convex network problems, Engineering Management Systems Working Paper, Princeton University (1985).

  26. B. von Hohenbalken, Simplicial decomposition in nonlinear programming algorithms, Mathematical Programming 13(1977)49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, MINOS user’s guide, Report SOL 77-9, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, California (1977).

  28. J.M. Mulvey, S.A. Zenios and D. Ahlfeld, Simplicial decomposition for convex generalized networks, Engineering Management Systems Working Paper, Princeton University (1985).

  29. R.P. Brent, An algorithm with guaranteed convergence for finding the zero of a function, The Computer Journal 14, 4(1975).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant No. DCR-8401098-A0l.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zenios, S.A., Mulvey, J.M. Relaxation techniques for strictly convex network problems. Ann Oper Res 5, 517–538 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739237

Keywords and phrases

Navigation