Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a two-field theory of elementary particles

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Summary

It is shown why the symmetry principle between the baryon triplet (Λnp) and lepton triplet (μ eν) suggests a two-field theory of elementary particles. One massless spinor field is used to describe the nucleons and light leptons and a second spinor field with finite bare mass the « strange » particles Λ andμ. The two-field model resembles the theories of Heisenberg and Nambu in several respects but there are also important differences which are spelled out.

Riassunto

Si mostra come il principio di simmetria tra il tripletto di barioni (Λnp) e il tripletto di leptoni (μeν) suggerisca per le particelle elementari una teoria a due campi. Si usa un campo spinoriale per descrivere i nucleoni e i leptoni leggeri e un secondo campo spinoriale con massa nuda finita per descrivere le particelle « strane » Λ eμ. Sotto molti aspetti il modello a due campi è simile alla teoria di Heisenberg e di Nambu ma esistono anche notevoli differenze che si mettono in evidenza.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Sakata:Prog. Theor. Phys.,16, 686 (1956); This type of theory is similar to that ofE. Fermi andC. N. Yang:Phys. Rev.,76, 1739 (1949); cfr. alsoM. M. Lévy andR. E. Marshak:Suppl. Nuovo Cimento,11, 366 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. W. E. Thirring:Nucl. Phys.,10, 97 (1959); see alsoY. Yamaguchi:Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.,11, 1, 37 (1959); andM. Ikeda, S. Ogawa andY. Ohnuki:Prog. Theor. Phys.,22, 715 (1959); and23; 1073 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Gamba, R. E. Marshak andS. Okubo:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,45, 881 (1959).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Goldanski:Nucl. Phys.,6, 531 (1958);O. Klein:Arkiv. Swed. Acad. Sci.,16, 191 (1959);I. Saavedra:Nucl. Phys.,10, 6 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, Y. Ohnuki andS. Sakata:Prog. Theor. Phys.,23, 1174 (1960);Y. Katayama andM. Taketani: preprint (Kyoto);M. E. Mayer:Nuovo Cimento,17, 802 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. P. Dürr, W. Heisenberg, H. Mitter, S. Schlieder andK. Yamazaki:Zeits. Naturfor.,14 a, 441 (1959); hereinafter we shall call this the Heisenberg theory.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Nambu andG. Jona-Lasinio: preprint (University of Chicago); this will be referred to as the Nambu theory. Cfr. alsoJ. Goldstone: CERN preprint.

  8. R. Haag:Kgl. Danske Videns. Selb. Mat. Fys. Medd.,29, 12 (1955);P. W. Hall andA. S. Wightman:Kgl. Danske Videns. Selb. Mat. Fys. Medd.,31, 5 (1957).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Seee.g. F. Riesz andB. Sz. Nagy:Functional Analysis, 2nd. Edition (New York, 1953), pp. 367.

  10. R. Haag: see ref. (8);L. Gårding andA. S. Wightman:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 40, 617, 622 (1954);A. S. Wightman andS. Schweber;Phys. Rev.,98, 812 (1955).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Haag: see ref. (8);L. Van Hove:Physica,18, 145 (1952);Y. Nambu andG. Jona-Lasinio: ref. (7).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Touschek:Nuovo Cimento,13, 394 (1959); in this paperTouschek also shows that, under certain conditions, a doubling of states is necessary for a finite mass particle independent of the approximation when one starts with a two-component field.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. However, it must be continuous with respect to the coupling constant, in view of the theorem of Rellich (see:F. Riesz andB. Sz. Nagy: loc. cit., pp. 169); this remark applies to the continuous spectrum of all theories.

  14. The reasons are different for the two authors;Nambu discards them=0 solution since he believes that it is unstable on two counts: 1) the analogy with superconductivity (where the superconducting state is stable and the normal state is not) and 2) on the basis of a calculation of the difference between the divergent zero-point energies. However, neither argument is conclusive: 1) the normal state becomes as stable as the superconducting state in the limit of infinite volume of the superconductor which corresponds more closely to the elementary particle case with its infinite number of degrees of freedom and hence there is no reason why two solutions should not be equally stable in two orthogonal Hilbert spaces and 2) the meaning of the divergent zero-point energy is unclear at the present stage of quantum field theory. On the other hand, Heisenberg effectively discards them=0 solution since he wishes to describe the leptons by means of the « scale » transformation. Besides, in the Heisenberg theory, the propagator function is chosen in such a way that it is zero form=0 and therefore it is self-consistent to discard them=0 solution.

  15. Such a distinction has already been made for different purposes byY. Takahashi:Nuovo Cimento,1, 414 (1955).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Okubo: CERN preprint.

  17. W. Pauli:Nuovo Cimento,6, 204 (1957); however, the possible existence of such a transformation was already noted byS. Kamefuchi andS. Tanaka:Prog. Theor. Phys.,14, 225 (1955).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. H. P. Dürr: preprint (Münich).

  19. Actually, in this case, the conservation of the current implies the separateC andP invariance of the matrix elements:W. E. Thirring:Nucl. Phys.,14, 565 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Recently,Heisenberg (private communication) has given an argument justifying this approach by using the analogy with superconductivity and ferromagnetism in still another fashion; he argues that the non-zero isospin of the vacuum is only true locally (the over-all vacuum benig symmetrical) just as the breakdown of the usual gauge invariance is only true locally (the gauge invariance returning for large distances).

  21. L. Van Hove’s workPhysica,25, 365 (1959) in this connection is unfortunately not relevant since he could only show that in a certain model a strong interaction not satisfying a prescribed invariance principle can be converted into a strong interaction obeying the invariance principleplus a weak interaction.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. W. E. Thirring:Ann. Phys.,3, 91 (1958);Nuovo Cimento,9, 1007 (1958);V. Glaser:Nuovo Cimento,9, 990 (1958).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. See, however, the work byJ. Leal Ferreira andY. Katayama:Prog. Theor. Phys.,23, 776 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Kita andE. Predazzi:Nuovo Cimento,17, 908 (1960); have used a similar method for explaining the mass difference between the muon and electron. They utilize a strong cut-off dependence to obtain the large muon mass from zero bare mass in a way which we consider unreasonable.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. W. E. Thirring:Nucl. Phys.,10, 97 (1959);14, 565 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. R. E. Marshak (Guest Professor under the Ford Foundation and Guggenheim Fellow)

    Present address: the University of Rochester, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CERN, Geneva

    R. E. Marshak (Guest Professor under the Ford Foundation and Guggenheim Fellow) & S. Okubo

Authors
  1. R. E. Marshak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Okubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported by National Science Foundation, U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshak, R.E., Okubo, S. Towards a two-field theory of elementary particles. Nuovo Cim 19, 1226–1248 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731399

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731399

Search

Navigation