Skip to main content
Log in

A note concerning the quantization of spinor fields

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Summary

Jauch’s paper with the same title is re-examined by use of the usual quantization formalisms. Schwinger’s action principle can give the commutation relations suggested byJauch, if we choose appropriate canonical independent variables, different from the variational independent variables. Quantization in the interaction representation is also discussed. The interaction betweenJauch’s field and the electromagnetic field is considered.

Riassunto

Per mezzo del normale formalismo di quantizzazione si riesamina il lavoro diJauch con lo stesso titolo. Il principio di azione di Schwinger può dare le relazioni di commutazione proposte daJauch se si scelgono variabili canoniche indipendenti adeguate, differenti dalle variabili indipendenti variazionali. Si discute anche la quantizzazione nella rappresentazione d’interazione. Si esamina l’interazione fra il campo di Jauch e il campo elettromagnetico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Footnotes

  1. P. Jordan andW. Pauli:Zeits. f. Phys.,47, 15 (1928);M. Fierz:Helv. Phys. Acta,12, 3 (1939);M. Fierz andW. Pauli:Proc. Roy. Soc., A173, 211 (1939);W. Pauli:Solvey Berichte (1939);Rev. Mod. Phys.,13, 203 (1941).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. This fact is stressed by ProfessorYukawa in his book,Introduction to the Theory of Elementary Particles (in Japanese, 1948), first edition, p. 193.

  3. W. Heisenberg andW. Pauli:Zeits. f. Phys.,56, 1 (1929);59, 168 (1930).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Wentzel:Einführung in die Quantdentheorie der Wellenfelder (1943).

  5. H. Umezawa:Theory of Elementary Particles (in Japanese, 1953).

  6. Y. Takahashi andU. Umezawa:Prog. Theor. Phys.,9, 14, 501 (1953).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Schwinger:Phys. Rev.,82, 914 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Jauch:Helv. Phys. Acta,27, 89 (1954).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Majorana:Nuovo Cimento,14, 171 (1937);W. H. Furry:Phys. Rev.,54, 56 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Besides, we have the quantization rule which is given byPeierls (Proc. Roy. Soc., A214, 143 (1952). Some erroneous points are found in his proof and are quite essential in our present discussion. A quantity of the Heisenberg representation and one of the interaction representation cannot generally be combined with each other by a unitary transformation, as in equation (3.5) in his paper. This is the very reason why Qx(x, σ) has to be introduced in addition to the quantities in the Heisenberg and interaction representation. As will be shown in section2 (iii) in our paper, the field quantity in the Heisenberg representation is Jauch’s field and the quantity in the interaction representation is the electron-positron field which satisfies a different commutation relation from Jauch’s. This is a typical example contradicting his equation (3.5). The neutral vector field interacting with a spin 1/2 field is also such a case.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. (14)Schwinger’s action principle gives only the commutation relation att=t′. See reference (5).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, Y. A note concerning the quantization of spinor fields. Nuovo Cim 1, 414–426 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855170

Navigation