Summary
We present evidence that nonperturbative effects in lattice gauge theories do not obey at small coupling constant (largeβ) asymptotic scaling, but they rather behave as suggested by a recent result in continuum Yang-Mills theories. We also discuss the possible impact of these results on our understanding of QCD.
Riassunto
Si presenta evidenza che gli effetti non perturbativi nelle teorie di gauge su reticolo non seguono la legge di scala asintotica per piccoli valori della costante di accoppiamento (β grandi), ma si comportano secondo quanto suggerito da un recente risultato riguardante le teorie di Yang-Mills nel continuo. Sono anche discusse le possibili implicazioni nella comprensione della cromodinamica quantistica.
Реэюме
Мы предлагаем докаэательство, что непертурбационные зффекты в калибровочных теориях на рещетке не удовлетворяют при малых эначениях константы свяэи (больщих β) асимптотическому скейлингу. Их поведение, как следует иэ недавнего реэультата, описывается непрерывными теориями Янга-Миллса. Мы также обсуждаем воэможное влияние зтих реэультатов на наще понимание квантовой хромо динамики.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
For a rather complete and up to date review seeM. Creutz, L. Jacobs andC. Rebbi:Phys. Rep.,95, 201 (1983).
There are, however, some dissenting voices likeG. Bhanot andR. Dashen:Phys. Lett. B,113, 299 (1982).
M. Consoli andG. Preparata:Phys. Lett. B,154, 411 (1985); Addendum toOn the stability of the perturbative ground state in non-Abelian Yang-Mills theories, preprint BA-GT/85-14.
P. Colangelo, L. Cosmai, M. Pellicoro andG. Preparata:Phys. Lett. B,157, 77 (1985).
D. Barkai, M. Creutz andK. J. M. Moriarty:Phys. Rev. D,29, 1207 (1984).
D. Barkai, K. J. M. Moriarty andC. Rebbi:Phys. Rev. D,30, 1293 (1984).
D. Barkai, K. J. M. Moriarty andC. Rebbi:Force between static quarks and universality in lattice QCD, preprint BNL-32923 (May 1984).
K. Wilson:Phys. Rev. D,10, 2445 (1974).
M. Creutz:Phys. Rev. D,21, 2308 (1980).
B. Lautrup andM. Nauenberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,45, 1755 (1980).
Actually we have run on the large (16)4 lattice forβ in the interval [2, 3], forβ>3 our MC data refer to a (10)4 lattice.
A. Di Giacomo andG. C. Rossi:Phys. Lett. B,100, 481 (1981).
A. Di Giacomo andG. Paffuti:Phys. Lett. B,108, 327 (1982).
R. Gupta, G. Guralnik, A. Patel, T. Warnock andC. Zemach:Phys. Rev. Lett.,53, 1721 (1984);A. Hasenfratz, P. Hasenfratz, U. Heller andF. Karsch:Phys. Lett. B,143, 193 (1984).
A. D. Kennedy, J. Kuti, S. Meyer andB. J. Pendleton:Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 87 (1985).
A calculation by the same authors with the WilsonSU 3 action (ref. (6)) on a lattice of the same size produces results in agreement with BCM (see fig. 6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colangelo, P., Cosmai, L., Pellicoro, M. et al. Freedom and confinement in lattice Yang-Mills theories: a case for divorce. Nuov Cim A 92, 1–16 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730423
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730423