Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of transportation deregulation in the united states on Canadian—U.S. distribution channels

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1978-80 period the United States deregulated its transportation industry. Common carriers, through increased reward and expert power, can now perform a more dominant role in the distribution channel. Because of major differences created in the regulatory environment of the U.S. and Canada, deregulation has also had an impact on the distribution channels between the two countries. It is evident horizontal competition between U.S. and Canadian carriers, and between shippers for both domestic and export markets in the respective countries has increased. Another major result of deregulation has been that Canadian shippers and carriers engaged in international traffic to the U.S., even though they have been in complicance with Canadian law, have found themselves subject to the extra-territorial reach of the U.S. anti-trust legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beier, Frederick J. 1969. “The Role of the Common Carrier in the Channel of Distribution,”Transportation Journal 9 (Winter) 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Andrew. 1983. “A Transportation Regulatory Agenda for the Year 2000.”Proceedings —Transportation Research Forum 24, pp. 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globe and Mail. 1982. “Ruling By ICC Backs Canada in Truck Row.”The Globe and Mail Report on Business, October 19, p. B10.

  • Lande, Richard J. 1982. “U.S. Deregulation—Antitrust Implications for Canadian Railways and Shippers.”The Logistics and Transportation Review 18 (No. 2) 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. “Possible Remedies to Reconcile the Differences Between Canada and U.S. Rail Regulation.”Proceedings—Transportation Research Forum 24, pp. 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore 1960. “Marketing Myopia.”Harvard Business Review (July–August) 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongman, John Will. 1982. “U.S. Antitrust Ramifications for the Canadian Transport Industry.”Proceedings—Transportation Research Forum 23, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, Bert. 1979. “Using Physical Distribution Strategy for Better Channel Management.”Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science 7 (Winter) 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. 1983Catalogue 65-001 Summary of External Trade Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpintesta, Lou. 1983. “Shippers, Railways Differ On Impact of Staggers Act.”Canadian Transportation and Distribution Management 86 (October) 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Kenneth C., Singer, Marc G., and Peterson, Roger A. 1983. “The Impact of Regulatory Reform on U.S. For-Hire Freight Transportation: The Users' Perspective.”Transportation Journal 22 (Summer) 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellison, R.A. The impact of transportation deregulation in the united states on Canadian—U.S. distribution channels. JAMS 13, 134–145 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729942

Keywords

Navigation