Skip to main content
Log in

Return on advertising: Another approach

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With companies becoming more cost conscious the need for a more effective method of measuring the Return on Advertising is becoming more crucial. Previous attempts at measuring the return on advertising have focused on measuring either the sales effect or the communicative effect of an advertising campaign. However, both methods of measurement leave something to be desired and yet both techniques have strong points. This article proposes that one should synthesize the best elements of both measurement techniques into an objective design that will enable the practitioner to determine his ROA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Britt, Steuart Henderson. 1969 “Are So-Called Successful Advertising Campaigns Really Successful?” {jtJournal of Advertising Research}, No. 2, (June).

  • Boyd, Harper W., Michael L. Ray and Edward C. Strong. 1972. “An Attitudinal Framework for Advertising Strategy”. Journal of Marketing (April) 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Ray H. 1965. “A Managerial Approach to Advertising Management”. Journal of Marketing (October) 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1969. Measuring the Sales and Profit Results of Advertising. New York: Association of National Advertisers. 25, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, Russell H., ed. 1961. Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association of National Advertisers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon. 1965. “Behavioral Support for Opinion Change”. Public Opinion Quarterly (Fall) 404–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, Jack B. and Willard C. Hugli, Jr. 1969. “Evaluating the Effect of Company Promotional Activities: A Neglected Area for Research and Management Attention”. Journal of Marketing (October) 66–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, Robert C. and Garry A. Steiner. 1961. “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness”. Journal of Marketing (October) 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, William. 1971. Marketing Management: A Systems Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Market Science Institute. 1968. Advertising Measurement and Decision Making. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshner, Donald C. 1971. “Dagmar Revisited—Eight Years Later”. Journal of Advertising Research. (April) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palda, Kristian S. 1964. The Measurement of Cumulative Advertising Effects. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palda, Kristian S. 1966. “The Hypothesis of a Hierarchy of Effects: A Partial Evaluation”. Journal of Marketing Research (February).

  • Ray, Michael L. 1973. “A Decision Sequence Analysis of Developments in Marketing Communications”. Journal of Marketing (January).

  • Simon, Julian L. 1971. The Management of Advertising. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Gail. 1965. “How GM Measures Ad Effectiveness”. Printer's Ink (May 14) 19–22.

  • Zielske, Hubert. 1959. “The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising”. Journal of Marketing (January).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, R.L., Barry, T.E. & Johnson, B.P. Return on advertising: Another approach. JAMS 3, 383–395 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729297

Keywords

Navigation