Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The behaviour of large-angle pd → dp scattering with energy

Энергетическая эависимость pd → dp рассеяния на больщие углы

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

We present a discussion of the energy-dependent behaviour of the proton-deuteron elastic scattering atϑ c.m.=180°. We show that the interference betweenS andP waves is mainly responsible for the low-energy peak. It is also pointed out that the present-day experimental information is not sufficient to support or rule out the alternative explanations for the higher-energy peak.

Riassunto

Si discute il comportamento dipendente dall’energia dello scattering elastico protonedeutone perϑ c.m.=180°. Si dimostra che il picco di bassa energia è determinato principalmente dall’interferenza tra ondeS eP. Inoltre si pone in evidenza che gli attuali dati sperimentali non sono sufficienti per sostenere o scartare le alternative interpretazioni proposte per il picco di alta energia.

Реэюме

Мы обсуждаем знергетическую эависимость упругого рассеяния про-тона на дейтроне наθ Ц.М.=180°. Мы покаэываем, что интерференция междуS иP волнами в основном ответственна эа пик при ниэких знергиях. Также отмечается, что имеюшаяся на сегоднящний день зкспериментальная информация недостаточна для подтверждения или исключения альтернативных общяснений для пика при высо-ких знергиях.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. S. Bhakar andV. S. Bhasin: inFew Particle Problems in the Nuclear Interaction, edited byI. Slaus, S. A. Moszkowski, R. P. Haddock andW. T. H. van Oers (Amsterdam, 1972), p. 523.

  2. A. Horsley:Nucl. Data, A4, 321 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Seagrave: inThree-Particle Problems in the Nuclear and Particle Physics, edited byJ. S. McKee andP. M. Rolph (Amsterdam, 1970), p. 41.

  4. Particle Data Group: University of California, Report No. UCRL-20000NN.

  5. G. Igo, J. C. Fong, S. L. Verbeck, M. Goitein, D. L. Hendrie, J. C. Carroll, B. McDonald, A. Stetz andM. C. Makino:Nucl. Phys.,195 A, 33 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. Alder, W. Dollhoff, C. Lunke, C. F. Perdrisat, W. K. Roberts, P. Kitching, G. Moss, W. C. Olsen andJ. R. Priest:Phys. Rev. C,6, 2010 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Yamaguchi:Phys. Rev.,95, 1635 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. N. Mitra: inAdvances in Nuclear Physics, edited byM. Baranger andE. Vogt, Vol.3 (New York, 1969), p. 1;I. H. Sloan:Nucl. Phys.,168 A, 211 (1971).

  9. J. S. Sharma, V. S. Bhasin andA. N. Mitra:Nucl. Phys.,35 B, 466 (1971). (There are several errors in this paper.)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. K. Kerman andL. S. Kisslinger:Phys. Rev.,180, 1483 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. S. Craigie andC. Wilkin:Nucl. Phys.,14 B, 477 (1969). There are several errors in this paper. See alsoG. W. Barry:Ann. of Phys.,73, 482 (1972);Phys. Rev. D,7, 1441 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. L. Anderson, M. S. Dixit, H. J. Evans, K. A. Klare, D. A. Larson, M. V. Sherbrook, R. L. Martin, D. Kessler, D. B. Nagle, H. A. Thiesseu, C. K. Hargrove, B. P. Hincks andS. Fukui:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1536 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Chahoud, G. Russo andF. Selleri:Phys. Rev. Lett.,11, 506 (1963). The arguments presented in this paper are also applicable to the pd→dp scattering as both pp→dπ+ and pn→dπ0 contribute to the triangular graphc) of Fig. 2. Effect of pn→dπ0 is taken care of by the factor 3/2 in eq. (3).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Such a hypothesis was first advanced byV. A. Grishin andM. J. Podgoretskii: JINR-Report No. R-1508, Dubna (1964). See alsoL. A. Kondratyuk andI. S. Shapiro:Yad. Fiz.,12, 401 (1971) (Sov. Journ. Nucl. Phys.,12, 220 (1970).)

  15. The indications are that the force between nucleon and Δ(1236) is strong enough to give rise to a dibaryon resonance in the (J p=2+,T=1) state. (The present situation for the existence of dibaryon resonances is reviewed byL. M. Libby andE. Predazzi:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,2, 881 (1969).) Therefore, it is appropriate to take the Δ(1236), instead of theN *(1688)-resonance, for the formation of the 3Δ He-state.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.

    B. S. Bhakar

Authors
  1. B. S. Bhakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

To speed up publication, the author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhakar, B.S. The behaviour of large-angle pd → dp scattering with energy. Nuov Cim A 18, 737–746 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02727589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02727589

Search

Navigation