Skip to main content
Log in

The polarisation observables for dp elastic scattering

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the one-nucleon exchange approximation, collinear kinematics and invariant-amplitude method with the one-nucleon-exchange assumption, the elastic deuteron–proton scattering is considered. Calculations of polarisation characteristics of \(T_{20}\), \(\kappa _{0}\), \(T_{20} +2\sqrt{2} \kappa _{0} \) vs. k, \(C_{yy}\), \(K_{y}^{y} \), \(K_{xz}^{y} \) for the deuteron wave function in coordinate representation for the Argonne v18 potential, are demonstrated. Experimental data are better described by theoretical predictions using the invariant-amplitude method than by the impulse approximation and in collinear kinematics. The obtained theoretical values of the tensor analysing power \(T_{20}\) and the polarisation transfer coefficient \(\kappa _{0}\) in the choice of the deuteron wave function for the fss2 baryon–baryon model, Bonn one-boson-exchange potential, Argonne v18 and Paris potentials, are in good agreement with the experimental data of leading collaborations and reviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K Sekiguchi et al, Phys. Rev. C 70, 014001 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S Ishikawa, EPJ Web Conf. 3, 05008 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R Ramazani-Sharifabadi et al, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 177 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M N Platonova and V I Kukulin, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 132 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A Kobushkin et al, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2627 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. N B Ladygina, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 199 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. V P Ladygin et al, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 69, 852 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M N Platonova and V I Kukulin, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 73, 86 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E M Darwish et al, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14, 822 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V I Zhaba, J. Phys. Stud. 21, 4101 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A A Temerbayev and Yu N Uzikov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 78, 35 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. V P Ladygin et al, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 938, 012007 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. H R Amir-Ahmadi et al, Phys. Rev. C 75, 041001(R) (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. B v Przewoski et al, Phys. Rev. C 74, 064003 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. K Sekiguchi et al, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064001 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L S Azhgirey et al, Phys. Lett. B 391, 22 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L S Azhgirey et al, Phys. Lett. B 387, 37 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V Punjabi et al, Phys. Lett. B 350, 178 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. T Aono et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4997 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A A Nomofilov et al, Phys. Lett. B 325, 327 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. V G Ableev et al, JINR Rapid Commun. 4[43]-90, 5 (1990)

  22. V G Ableev et al, JETP Lett. 47, 649 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. V Punjabi et al, Phys. Rev. C 39, 608 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. C F Perdrisat et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2840 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. B Kuehn et al, Phys. Lett. B 334, 298 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. E Cheung et al, Phys. Lett. B 284, 210 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T Dzikowski et al, Dubna Deuteron-91, Proc. Int. Workshop, JINR report E2-92-25 (JINR, Dubna, 1992) pp. 181–184

  28. V P Ladygin and N B Ladygina, J. Phys. G 23, 847 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M Tanifuji and S Ishikawa, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2493 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. R B Wiringa, V G J Stoks and R Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. V M Krasnopol’sky et al, Phys. Lett. B 165, 7 (1985)

  32. N E Cheung, Polarization transfer coefficient measurements in the deuteron breakup reaction \(^1\)H(d,p)X at 3.1 GeV, Ph.D. thesis (College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences, 1994)

  33. M Lacombe et al, Phys. Lett. B 101, 139 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R Machleidt, K Holinde and Ch Elster, Phys. Rep. 149, 1 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Y Fujiwara et al, Phys. Rev. C 65, 014002 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. J E Lynn et al, Phys. Rev. C 96, 054007 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. G G Ohlsen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 717 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V I Zhaba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhaba, V.I. The polarisation observables for dp elastic scattering. Pramana - J Phys 96, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02265-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02265-z

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation