Skip to main content
Log in

Quantum paradoxes resolved: a valid conceptual description of quantum physics

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)

Summary

Finding an interpretation of quantum mechanics without paradoxes is here shown to be a soluble problem of concepts, language, and logic. The ill-defined Copenhagen concepts ofobservation andmeasurement are transformed by a conceptual analysis into a number of well-defined subconcepts that take explicit account of the part played by theories in observation and measurement. Occurrence axioms for multiple events are formulated that can replace the usual measurement axioms and make «collapse of the wave function» dispensable. The usual fatal mixing of classical and quantum concepts is avoided by employing a two-model representation. Satisfactory answer to important questions of understanding are presented and the paradoxical aspects of known quantum thought experiments are shown to be spurious. The shortcomings and perplexities of the Copenhagen interpretation are avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Schrödinger:Naturwiss,23, 807, 823, 844 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein: inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist The Library of Living Philosophers, edited byP. A. Schilpp (Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1970), pp. 1–94, 663–688.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell:Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bell:Physics World,3, 33 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Bell:Physikal. Blätter,48, 267 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Heisenberg:Zeitschr. Phys.,43, 172 (1927).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Heisenberg:The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., 1930).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Bohr:Nature,121, 580 (1928).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. P. A. M. Dirac:The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, London, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. B. S. Dewitt andN. Graham:Am. J. Phys.,39, 724 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Gribbin:In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat. Quantum Physics and Reality (Wildwood House, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Herbert:Quantum Reality. Beyond the New Physics (Anchor Books, Doubleday, N.Y., 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Polkinghorne:The Quantum World (Longman, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. M. Rae:Quantum Physics: Illusion or Reality? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Einstein:Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1953), pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Pais:«Subtle is the Lord …», The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. P. Wigner:The Scientist Speculates, edited byI. J. Good (Heinemann, London, 1961). pp. 284–302; reprinted in:J. A. Wheeler andW. H. Zurek (Editors):Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky andN. Rosen:Phys. Rev.,47, 777 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Heisenberg:Der Teil und das Ganze (Piper, München, 1969); English edition:Physics and Beyond (Harper & Row, New York, N.Y., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. B. Pippard:Europ. J. Phys.,7, 43 (1986).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. N. F. Mott:Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A,126, 79 (1929).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Everett III:Rev. Mod. Phys.,29, 454 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. B. S. Dewitt andN. Graham (Editors):The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. v. Neumann:Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 38 (Springer, Berlin, 1932); English edition:Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. A. Fock:Czech. J. Phys.,7, 643 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. A. Fock: Über die Interpretation der Quantenmechanik, inPhilosophische Probleme der modernen Naturwissenschaft. Materialien der Allunionskonferenz zu den philosophischen Fragen der Naturwissenschaft, Moskau, 1958 (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1962), pp. 189–212 and 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. A. Fock:Über die Deutung der Quantenmechanik, inMax-Planck-Festschcrift 1958, edited byB. Kockel, W. Macke andA. Papapetrou (Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1959). pp. 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Wimmel:Quantum Physics and Observed Reality. A Critical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Wimmel:Principles of observation and conceptual rationalization of quantum mechanics, unpublished.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Retired from: Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimmel, H. Quantum paradoxes resolved: a valid conceptual description of quantum physics. Nuov Cim B 109, 1065–1081 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723230

PACS 03.65

PACS 03.65.Bz

Navigation