Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of the United States granting MFN status to Vietnam

  • Shorter Papers & Comments
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

In this paper, the direct impacts on Vietnam’s trading opportunities of the U.S. granting MFN treatment were first estimated by building up from the resulting level of tariffs applied to individual traded goods. Then, the economic impacts on Vietnam were inferred, using simulations with the Global Trade Analysis model. The results revealed that the increased market access to the United States brings significant welfare gains to Vietnam. The direct terms of trade improvement resulting from increased market access accounts for 60 percent of the total gain, with the remaining 40 percent derived from second-best induced gains in efficiency. Exports to the United States more than doubled, from $338 million to $768 million.13 The estimated increase in exports of clothing is especially significant, with these exports increasing almost fifteenfold, while exports of agricultural commodities decreased slightly. Total welfare as measured by Equivalent Variation increased by $ 118 million or 0.9 percent increase in real expenditure per capita. By granting MFN status to Vietnam, the United States also gains from improved resource allocation, although some of the gains are offset by deterioration in its terms of trade. The gains for the United States were estimated to be around $56 million per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. M., and W. Martin (1996). The Welfare Analysis of Fiscal Policy: A Simple, Unified Account. Working Paper 316, Department of Economics, Boston College (www.bc.edu).

  • Arce, H. M., and C. T. Taylor (1997). The Effects of Changing U.S. MFN Status for China.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133 (4): 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, C., P. J. Lloyd, and W. Martin (1999). The Uruguay Round, World Trade Organization, and Asia-Pacific Trade Liberalization. In P. J. Lloyd (ed.),International Trade Opening and the Formation of the Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for International Economics (1998).Vietnam’s Trade Policies 1998. Canberra.

  • Gehlhar, M. (1997). Historical Analysis of Growth and Trade Patterns in the Pacific Rim: An Evaluation of the GTAP Framework. In T. W. Hertel (ed.),Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W. (ed.) (1997).Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., C. Arndt, and T. W. Hertel (2000). Calibration and Validation of Trade Substitution Parameters in a GTAP Model: A Maximum Entropy Approach. Centre for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. (1997). Measuring Welfare Changes with Distortions. In J. Francois and K. Reinert (eds.),Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W., and L. A. Winters (1996).The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Textiles and Apparel (OTEXA). Web Site (http://otexa.ita.doc.gov).

  • World Bank (1998a).World Development Indicators 1998. Washington, D. C.

  • — (1998b).Vietnam: Rising to the Challenge. An Economic Report of the World Bank for the Consultative Group Meeting for Vietnam, December 7–8, 1998, World Bank Office in Vietnam, Hanoi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Fukase, E., Martin, W. The effects of the United States granting MFN status to Vietnam. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136, 539–559 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707293

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707293

Keywords

Navigation