Abstract
In an era when free trade has been championed by neoliberal policies across the world, there is surprisingly high usage of trade-restricting measures adopted by developed and developing countries. While dissatisfaction with the neoliberal doctrine of free trade is the most important reason behind these policies, it also symbolizes a return of nation-states against the forces of globalization. Policymaking in international trade can be tricky as several trade policy instruments can have very different impact on different domestic stakeholder groups. This chapter discusses these challenges using a study of the usage of trade policy instruments by India. In the last few years, India is seen to be using a number of policies aimed toward managing trade more effectively. The two sets of instruments which have been used frequently are the ‘Minimum Import Prices’ (MIP) and trade remedial measures like antidumping duties. This chapter will focus on these two sets of trade policy instruments to analyze the rationale behind their use. Recent controversies around these instruments suggest that while they give protection to some domestic stakeholders, other domestic players in the value chains may get adversely affected by these policies. This leads to some inter- and intra-sectoral trade-offs. This discussion will lead to a broader debate about the neoliberal policies propagated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and their conflict with policy space available to developing countries for managing trade policies to suit their national objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
DS90: India—Quantitative Restrictions on Imports of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products. Available at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds90_e.htm. Accessed 8th December 2018.
- 2.
https://www.cnbctv18.com/economy/share-of-manufacturing-in-indias-gdp-falling-despite-make-in-india-360521.htm. Accessed 8th December 2018.
- 3.
Also see Iyengar (2016).
- 4.
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=131591. Accessed 8th December 2018.
- 5.
- 6.
https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/a-better-duty-structure-needed/1312789/. Accessed 8th December 2018.
- 7.
- 8.
See Sharma (2018) and https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/indl-goods/svs/steel/gadkari-warns-steel-and-cement-firms-not-to-form-cartels/articleshow/63233219.cms. Accessed 8th December. See Mitra and Madhavan (2008) for a slightly older perspective on cement and steel cartels.
- 9.
The details of the measures can be found in the Rajya Sabha unstarred question no. 3813. The document can be found at http://steel.gov.in/sites/default/files/ru3813.pdf. Accessed on 8th December, 2018.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
References
Behera, H., & Wahi, G. (2018). How have MSME sector credit and exports fared? Reserve Bank of India Mint Street Memo No. 13. https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/MSM_Mintstreetmemos13.aspx#C7a.
Bhaduri, A. (2007). Development or developmental terrorism? Countercurrents.org. http://www.countercurrents.org/ind-bhaduri070107.htm. Accessed December 8, 2018.
Chandrasekhar, C. P. (2018). The indiscreet aggression of the bourgeoisie. International development economics associates. https://www.networkideas.org/featured-articles/2018/07/the-indiscrete-aggression-of-the-bourgeoisie/. Accessed December 8, 2018.
Chaudhuri, S. (2015). Import liberalisation and premature deindustrialisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(52), 60–69.
Department of Revenue. (2014). Report of the comptroller and auditor general of India for the year 2012–13 on performance of Special Economic Zones (SEZs). Union Government, Department of Revenue (Indirect Taxes—Customs), Ministry of Finance, Government of India, No. 21 of 2014. Available at http://www.saiindia.gov.in/english/home/Our_Products/Audit_Report/Government_Wise/union_audit/recent_reports/union_performance/2014/INDT/Report_21/21of2014.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2018.
Iyengar, S. P. (2016). Key input shortage strands polyester-makers. The Hindu Business line, June 01.
Lang, V. F., & Tavares, M. M. (2018). The distribution of gains from globalization (Working Paper No. WP/18/54). International Monetary Fund.
Levien, M. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–483.
Mitra, A., & Madhavan, M. (2008). Commodity cartels: Fact or fiction? The Hindu business line, May 18.
Mukherjee, A., Pal, P., Deb, S., Ray, S., & Goyal, T. M. (2016). Special economic zones in India. Springer, Berlin.
Rodrik, D. (2016). Put globalization to work for democracies. New York Times, September 17.
Rodrik, D. (2017). Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton University Press.
Sharma, Ch. R. S. (2018). Builders complain of high cement, steel prices. The Hindu business line, August 03.
Shiva, V., Jani, S., & Fontana, S. M. (2011). The great Indian land grab. Navadanya, New Delhi. http://www.navdanya.org/attachments/RFSTE_The%20Great%20Indian%20Land%20Grab_28-9-2011%20(1).pdf. Accessed December 8, 2018.
Srivastava, P. (2017). India’s bad loans: Here is the list of 12 companies constituting 25% of total NPAs. Financial Express, October 23, 2017.
Subramanian, A., & Kessler, M. (2013). The hyperglobalization of trade and its future (Working Paper No. 13-6). Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Thakurta, P. G. (2014). Polyester prince revisited. https://www.paranjoy.in/article/polyester-prince-revisited. Accessed December 8, 2018.
Thakurta, P. G. (2017). Did Adani Group evade ₹1,000 crore taxes? Economic and Political Weekly, 52(2), 35–40.
UNCTAD. (2018). Trade and development report 2018: Power, platforms and the free trade delusion. Available at https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tdr2018_en.pdf.
WTO. (2018a). India—Certain measures on imports of iron and steel products. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/518r_e.pdf. Accessed December 8, 2018.
WTO. (2018b). Report on G20 trade measures: Mid-May 2018 to Mid-October 2018. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/g20_wto_report_november18_e.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pal, P., Mukherjee, S. (2019). You Win Some, You Lose Some, and Some Get Rained Out: A Study of Some Recent Trade Policy Instruments Used by India in the Context of Neoliberalism. In: Biswas, P., Das, P. (eds) Indian Economy: Reforms and Development. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8269-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8269-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8268-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8269-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)