Skip to main content
Log in

Innocent or guilty? Redox activity in and magnetic and optical behaviour of dinuclear molydenum complexes

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenon of ‘non-innocence’, first articulated by Jørgensen in 1966, is briefly reviewed. Spectroelectrochemical studies of a range of dinuclear complexes of the type [Mo(NO)Tp*Cl2(bridge)] (bridge = dipyridyls) and [Mo(O)Tp*Cl2(bridge)] (bridge = diphenolates) which are redox active, show that oxidised or reduced forms of these species exhibit ‘non-innocence’. The spectral behaviour is associated with metal-to-ligand or ligand-to-metal charge transfer phenomena, probably the first time that monodentate bridging ligands have been implicated in ‘non-innocent’ behaviour. These bridging ligands also determine the nature and extent of magnetic interaction between the unpaired spins in [Mo(NO)Tp*Cl2(bridge)] and [Mo(O)Tp*Cl2(bridge)], the dominant mechanism of spin-exchange relying on the extent of {ie291-01}-delocalisation within the bridging ligands. The unusual optical behaviour of these dinuclear complexes when oxidised (oxomolybdenum diphenolates) or reduced (nitrosyl molybdenum dipyridyls) has led to the exploration of electrochromism as a means to develop variable optical attenuators operating in the near-infrared region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCleverty J A 1968Progr. Inorg. Chem. 10 49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jørgensen CK 1966Coord. Chem. Rev. 1 164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter-Addo G B and Legzdins P 1992Metal nitrosyls (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser C, Glaser T, Bill E, Weyhermüller T and Wieghardt K 2000J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 4352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg R and Gray H B 1964Inorg. Chem. 6 1844;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schrauzer G N and Mayweg V P 1966J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88 3235;

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Welch J H, Bereman R D and Singh P 1988Inorg. Chem. 27 2862;

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung G W, Bereman RD and Singh P 1994J. Coord. Chem. 33 331;

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kondo M, Minakoshi S, Iwata K, Shimizu T, Matsuzaka H, Kamigata N and Kitagawa S 1996Chem. Lett. 489

  10. Schrauzer G N and Mayweg V P 1965J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87 3585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCleverty J A and Ratcliff B 1970J. Chem Soc. A 1631

  12. Sellmann D, Emig S and Heinemann F 1997Angew. Chem., Int. Edn. 36 1734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. (d) Wieghardt K (personal communication)

  14. König E and Herzog S 1970J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 32 585; Hanazaki I and Nagakura S 1972Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 11 2003; Nakamoto K, Saito Y, Takamoto J and Hutchinson B 1972Inorg. Chem. 44 2312; Hughes and Macero 1976Inorg. Chem. 15 2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siedle A R 1987 inComprehensive coordination chemistry (eds) G Wilkinson, R D Gillard and J A McCleverty (Oxford: Pergamon)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buchanan R M, Downs H H, Shorthill W B, Pierpont C G, Kessel S L and Hendrickson DN 1978J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 7894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lange C W and Pierpont C G 1997Inorg. Chim. Acta 263 219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takvoryan N, Faramery K, Katovis V, Lovecchioi F V, Gore E S, Anderson LB and Busch D H 1986J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCleverty J A and Ward M D 1998Acc. Chem. Res. 12 842; McCleverty JA, Ward M D and Jones C J 2001Comments Inorg. Chem. 22 293; Ward M D and McCleverty J A 2001J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Psillakis E, Shonfield P K A, Jouaitti A-A, Maher J P, McCleverty J A and Ward M D 2000J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 241

  21. CoeB J, Foulon J-D, Hamor TA, Jones C J, McCleverty J A,BloorD,Cross,GHand Axon T L 1994J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 3427; Coe B J, Hamor T A, Jones C J,McCleverty J A, Bloor D, Cross G H and Axon TL 1995J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 673; Malaun M, Kowallick R, McDonagh A M, Marcaccio M, Paul R L, Asselberghs I, Clays K, Persoons A, Bildstein B, Fiorini C, Nunzi J-M, Ward M D and McCleverty J A 2001J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 3025

  22. McDonagh A M, Bayly S R, Riley D J, Ward M D, McCleverty J A, Clowin M A, Morgan C N, Varrazza R, Penty R V and White I H 2000Chem. Mater. 12 2523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Enemark J H and Feltham R D 1974Coord. Chem. Rev. 13 339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McWhinnie SLW, Thomas J A, Hamor T A, Jones C J, McCleverty J A, Collison D, Mabbs F E, Harding C J, Yellowless L J and Hutchings M G 1966Inorg. Chem. 35 760; Maher JP, McCleverty J A, Navas Badiola J A and Ward M D 1993J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas J A, Hutchings M G, Jones C J and McCleverty J A 1996Inorg. Chem. 35 289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kowallick R, Jones A N, Reeves Z R, Jeffery J C, McCleverty JA and Ward MD 1999 NewJ. Chem. 23 915

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ung V A, Bardwell D A, Jeffery J C, Maher J P, McCleverty J A, Ward M D and Williamson A 1996Inorg. Chem. 35 5290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 21. Harden N C, Humphrey E R, Jeffery J C, Lee S-M, Marcaccio M, McCleverty J A,Rees L H and Ward M D 1999J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2417

  29. Bayly S R, Humphrey E R, de Chair H, Paredes C G, Bell Z R, Jeffery J C, McCleverty J A, Ward M D, Totti F, Gatteschi D, Courric S, Steele B R and Screttas C G 2001J. Chem. Soc.,Dalton Trans. 1401

  30. Reitz D C and Weissman S I 1960J. Chem. Phys. 33 700; Brière R, Dupeyre R-M,Lemaire H, Morat C, Raassat A and Rey P 1965Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 34 4828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shonfield P K A, Behrendt A, Jeffery J C, Maher J P, McCleverty J A,PsillakisE, Ward M D and Western C 1999J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 4341

  32. Longuet-Higgins J C 1950J. Chem. Phys. 18 265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bayly S, McCleverty J A, Ward, M D, Gatteschi D and Totti F 2000Inorg. Chem. 39 1288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barber B, Giles C R, Askyuk V, Ruel R, Stulzl L and Bishop D 1998IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 10 1262; Kawai T, Koga M, Okuno M and Kotoh T 1998Electron Lett. 34 264; JinY-S, Lee S-S and Son Y-S 1999Electron Lett. 35 916

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon A. McCleverty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCleverty, J.A., Ward, M.D. Innocent or guilty? Redox activity in and magnetic and optical behaviour of dinuclear molydenum complexes. J Chem Sci 114, 291–309 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703822

Keywords

Navigation