Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging behaviour in tadpoles of the bronze frogRana temporalis: Experimental evidence for the ideal free distribution

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of bronze frogRana temporalis tadpoles (pure or mixed parental lines) to assess the profitability of food habitats and distribute themselves accordingly was tested experimentally using a rectangular choice tank with a non-continuous input design. Food (boiled spinach) was placed at two opposite ends of the choice tank in a desired ratio (1:1, 1:2 or 1:4) to create habitat A and B. The tadpoles in Gosner stage 28–33, pre-starved for 24 h, were introduced in an open ended mesh cylinder placed in the center of the choice tank, held for 4 min (for acclimation) and then released to allow free movement and habitat selection. The number of tadpoles foraging at each habitat was recorded at 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min time intervals. The actual suitability,S i (the food available in a habitat after colonization of tadpoles) of each habitat was obtained from the equationS i =B if i (d i) whereB i is basic suitability (amount of food provided at each habitat before release of tadpoles),f i is the rate of depletion of food (lowering effect) with introduction of each tadpole, andd i is the density of tadpoles in habitati. The expected number of tadpoles at each habitat was derived from the actual suitability. With no food in the choice tank, movement of the tadpoles in the test arena was random indicating no bias towards any end of the choice tank or the procedure. In tests with a 1:1 food ratio, the observed ratio of tadpoles (11.71: 12.28) was comparable with the expected 12:12 ratio. The observed number of tadpoles in the habitats with a 1:2 food ratio was 8.71:15.29 and 7.87:16.13 for pure and mixed parental lines respectively. In both cases, the observed ratios were close to the expected values (7:17). Likewise, in experiments with a 1:4 food ratio, the observed number of tadpoles in the two habitats (10.78:37.22) did not differ significantly from the expected ratio of 7:41. In all tests, the number ofR. temporalis tadpoles matched ideally with habitat profitability (undermatching indexK ≜ 1. The study shows that tadpoles of the bronze frog exhibit an ideal free distribution while foraging regardless of whether they are siblings or non-siblings in a group, which correlates well with their group living strategy in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buxton N E 1984 The importance of food in the determination of the winter flock sites of the shelduck;Wildfowl 32 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie R J 1977 Optimal foraging in great titsParus major;Nature (London) 268 137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan R J and Welden A. W 2002Spreadsheet exercises in ecology and evolution (Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates) pp 321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Earn D J D and Johnstone R A 1997 A systematic error in tests of ideal free theory;Proc R Soc London B 264 1671–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D F and Sise T E 1980 Observations on stream minnows in a patchy environment: A test of a theory of habitat distribution;Ecology 61 790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell S D and Lucas H L Jr 1970 On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds;Acta Biotheor. 19 16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill J A, Sutherland W J and Norris L 2001 “Depletion models” can predict shore bird distribution at different spatial scales;Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268 369–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godin J J and Keenleyside M H A 1984 Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): A test of the ideal free distribution theory;Anim. Behav. 32 120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosner K L 1960 A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae, with notes on identification;Herpetologica 16 183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand T C and Dill L M 1997 The energetic equivalence of cover to juvenile coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch): Ideal free distribution theory applied;Behav. Ecol. 8 437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley A. B 1981 Learning the evolutionary stable strategy;J. Theor. Biol. 89 611–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper D G C 1982 Competitive foraging in mallards: ‘Ideal Free’ ducks;Anim. Behav. 30 575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston A I and McNamara J M 1986 Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution;Anim. Behav. 35 301–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman A J 1990 Group foraging in starlings: Distribution of unequal competitors;Anim. Behav. 40 801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M 1979 An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks; Z.Tierpsychol. 51 36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura K 1999 Exploration of optimal giving-up time in uncertain environment: a sit-and-wait forager;J. Theor. Biol. 199 321–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G A 1970 The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection inScatophaga stercoraria L (Diptera: Scatophagia) IX Spatial distribution of fertilization rates and evolution of male searching strategy within the reproductive area;Evolution 28 93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G A and Sutherland W J 1986 Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: Phenotype-limited ideal free models;Anim. Behav. 34 1222–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidapur S K 2001 Behavioral ecology of anuran tadpoles: The Indian scenario;Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. B67 311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W J 1982 Spatial variation in the predation of cockles by oystercatchers at Traeth Melynog, Anglesey II. The pattern of mortality;J. Anim. Ecol. 51 491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W J 2002 Ideal free distribution; inEncyclopedia of evolution (ed.) M Pagel (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 557–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W J and Parker G A 1992 The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors;Anim. Behav. 44 345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot A J and Kramer D L 1986 Effects of food and oxygen availability on habitat selection by guppies in a laboratory environment;Can. J. Zool. 64 88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Thompson D J and Parker G A 1996 Interference and the ideal free distribution: oviposition in a parasitoid wasp;Behav. Ecol. 7 387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinivas K. Saidapur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veeranagoudar, D.K., Shanbhag, B.A. & Saidapur, S.K. Foraging behaviour in tadpoles of the bronze frogRana temporalis: Experimental evidence for the ideal free distribution. J. Biosci. 29, 201–207 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703418

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703418

Keywords

Navigation