Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of WTO and environmental issues

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple negotiating rounds of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and World Trade Organization (WTO) since 1947 have conferred economic benefits through liberalized international trade. A growing body of evidence also points to linkages between liberalized trade and damage to the global environment, ecology, and natural resource base. Ironically, the increased economic well-being conferred by trade liberalization ultimately provides the basis for improved environmental protection. It is the interim environmental damage due to trade liberalization that is controversial and needing amelioration. The proposition here is to promote further trade liberalization, but only as long as environmental ethics and sustainability issues are satisfactorily addressed. Trade liberalization should not be permitted at the expense of adequate environmental protection and sustainability. Future WTO rounds need to address both development benefits and environmental ethics issues in a net social welfare maximization setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • About the WTO, “Basics: The Uruguay Round” [on-line]. Available:http://www.wto.org./wto/about/facts5.htm. Cited Aug. 10, 1998.

  • Adger, W. E. and M. C. Whitby, “Natural-resource Accounting in the Land-use Sector: Theory and Practice,”Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 20(1) (1992), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. and R. Blackhurst (eds.),The Greening of World Trade Issues (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., “Trade Liberalization and Environmental Policy.” Presented at USDA. ERS Conference on Trade and the Environment: A Survey of the Issues. Washington, DC (1993).

  • Amtzen, J., I. Hemmer, and O. Kuik (eds),International Trade and Sustainable Development (VU University Press, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, N., “Environmental Policy in a Multilateral Context.” Presented at USDA, ERS Conference on Trade and the Environment: A Survey of the Issue. Washington, DC (1993).

  • Beckerman, W., “Sustainable Development: Is it a Useful Concept?” in D. VanDe Veer and C. Pierce (eds.),The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1998), pp. 462–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, K.,Transportation, the Environment and Economic Policy (Edward Algar Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, Hants, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G. and K. Reichelderfer, “Effects of Natural Resource Policies on Agricultural Trade,” in J. D. Sutton (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO, 1988), pp. 126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, N. C. and E. P. Thor, “Industry Note: Pesticide Regulation and Inter-American Trade,”Agribusiness 11(3) (1995), 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, N. C. and E. P. Thor, “Pesticide Regulation and Inter-American Trade.” Presented at Pesticide Tolerance Levels Conference, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture. Quito, Ecuador (1993).

  • Crosson, P., “Sustainable Agriculture: A Global Perspective,”Choices, 2nd Quarter (1993), pp. 38–42.

  • Daly, H. E., “On Wilfred Beckerman’s Critique of Sustainable Development.” In D. VanDe Veer and C. Pierce (eds.),The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1998), pp. 474–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. M., “Sustainable Agriculture: A Survey of the Literature,” in P. Low (ed.),International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159, Washington, DC: The World Bank (1992), pp. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunmore, J., “National Environmental Policies and Trade Competitiveness.” Presented at USDA, ERS Conference on Trade and the Environment: A Survey of the Issues. Washington, DC (1993).

  • Eglin, R., “GATT and Environmental Protection,” in J. Arntzen, I. Hemmer, and O. Kuik (eds.),International Trade and Sustainable Development (VU University Press, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, P. M. and A. C. Nessman. “Integrating Environmental Protection and North American Free Trade.” Conference Paper. Presented at Australian Agricultural Economics Society. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, D.,Agriculture, Trade and the Environment: Anticipating the Policy Changes (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M., “The Ethical Basis of the Economic View of the Environment,” in D. VanDe Veer and C. Pierce (eds.),People, Penguins and Plastic Trees (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1986), pp. 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, “Trade and Environment: TE 001.” Geneva. Information and Media Relations Division (3 April) (1993).

  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, “Trade and Environment: TE 003.” Geneva. Information and Media Relations Division. (11 August) (1993a).

  • Hathway, D. E., “How Will a More ‘Green’ GATT Affect Agriculture”? Presentation on GATT Conference on Trade and the Environment: The Implications for Agriculture (1993).

  • Hemmer, I. W., “The State of the Art: A Critical Review of the Literature,” in J. Arntzen, I. Hemmer, and O. Kuik (eds.),International Trade and Sustainable Development (VU University Press, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • IATRC, “Bringing Agriculture into the GATT: The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, An Evaluation.” The International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium Commissioned Paper No. 9, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (1994), pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. H., “World Trade and the Law of GATT” (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Josling, J. E., S. Tangermann, and T. K. Warley,Agriculture in the GATT (St. Martin’s Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, P. (ed.),International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper #159. Washington, DC: The World Bank (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, P. and R. Safadi, “Trade Policy and Pollution,” in P. Low (ed.),International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper #159. Washington, DC: The World Bank (1992), pp. 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren, D., “The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: A New World Order for Agricultural Trade?”Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 63(1) (1995), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A., Presentation to Annual Meeting of Agricultural Institute of Canada, Montreal, Quebec (1989).

  • McClain, E. A., “Trade Agreements, Competition, and the Environment: Gridlock at the Crossroads: Discussion,”J. Agr. and Applied Econ. 26(1) (1994), 129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranowski, J. M., J. Hrubovcak, and J. Sutton, “The Effects of Commodity Programs on Resource Use,” in R. E. Just and N. Bockstael (eds.),Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, T. L., S. Camboni, and S. El-Swaify (eds.),Adopting Conservation on the Farm: An International Perspective on the Socioeconomics of Soil and Water Conservation (The Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nationale Raad voor landbouwkundig Onderzoek,International Trade and the Environment. NRLO-rapport Nr. 92/19, ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands (1992).

  • Oxley, A., “The Post Uruguay Round Impact of Environment Issues on Australia’s Trade in Food.” Paper presented at the Arthur Anderson and Australian Agricultural Economics Society Forum on the GATT: The Uruguay Round — A New Era? 18 October, 1994, Melbourne (1994).

  • Rauscher, M., “International Economic Integration and the Environment: The Case of Europe,” in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds.),The Greening of World Trade Issues (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 1992), pp. 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.,A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. R., J. N. Lekakis, and G. P. Zanias (eds),Agriculture & World Trade Liberalization: Socio-Environmental Perspectives on the Common Agricultural Policy (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A., G. C. van Kooten, and W. H. Furtan, “Issues in Commodity Trade: Implications for Natural Resources,” in J. D. Sutton (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO, 1988), pp. 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, J. L. and G. F. Fairchild, “Trade Agreements, Competition, and the Environment: Gridlock at the Crossroads,”J. Agr. and Applied Econ. 26(1) (1994), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K., “Natural Resource Concepts in Trade Analysis,” in J. D. Sutton (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO, 1988), pp. 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfeir-Younis, A. and A. K. Dragun.Land and Soil Management: Technology, Economics, and Institutions (Westview Press, Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinner, J., “Trade and The Environment: Efficiency, Equity and Sovereignty Considerations,”Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(2) (1994), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, R. H., “The Environment, International Trade and Competitiveness,” in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds.),The Greening of World Trade Issues (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 1992), pp. 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R., “Sustainability: An Economist’s Perspective”, in D. Van De Veer and C. Pierce (eds.),The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1998), pp. 450–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. D. (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P.,Customs in Common (The New Press, New York, NY, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDe Veer, D. and C. Pierce (eds.),People, Penguins and Plastic Trees (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warley, T. K., “Agriculture in the GATT: Past and Future.” Dept. Agric. Econ. & Bus., University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Discussion Paper DP 88/4 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, F., “How ‘Green’ is the GATT?” Presentation to GATT Conference on Trade and the Environment: the Implications for Agriculture (1993).

  • World Committee on Environment and Development.Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization, “Golden Jubilee of the Multilateral Trading System.” Press Release, 5 February 1998 (1998a).

  • World Trade Organization, “From vision to reality: The multilateral trading system at fifty.” Press Release, 4 March 1998 (1998b).

  • World Trade Organization, “The Coming Challenge: Global Sustainable Development for the 21st Century.” Press Release, 17 March 1998 (1998c).

  • World Trade Organization, “WTO Completes Framework for Environmental, Regional and R&D Subsidies.” Press Release/101, 3 June 1998 (1998d).

  • Yu, D., “Free Trade is Green, Protectionism is Not,”Conservation Biology 8(4) (1994), 989–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph, N1G 2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    D. Peter Stonehouse

Authors
  1. D. Peter Stonehouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stonehouse, D.P. A review of WTO and environmental issues. J Agric Environ Ethics 13, 121–144 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694139

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694139

Key Words

Search

Navigation