Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an analytic methodology to accurately predict probing depth in integrated circuit structures

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work designs an analytic methodology for applying the probe-before-bump procedure to predict probing depth and proposes feasible probing design parameters to avoid excessive probing of the bump pad. Two kinds of multi-level wafers were used to implement the probing experiment, with a single touch down, and an overdrive of 70 µm, 100 µm, 130 µm, and 150 µm by using a vertical probe card. The Young’s modulus and hardness of the two multilevel structures are measured on which the first bump pads are produced by sputtering aluminum onto the SiO2, while the second bump pads are produced by sputtering aluminum onto the copper, creating a pad metal of approximately 1-µm thickness by using the nanoindenter. The test results indicate that the Young’s modulus of the thin film material exceeds that of bulk material by 20–30 GPa. The difference between analytic and experimental probing depth ranges from 2.3% to 8.9%, revealing that the proposed novel analytic model is extremely accurate. Engineers or researchers can use the analytic methodology to accurately predict probing depth and acquire probing parameters that are accurate, cost effective, and efficient, thus eliminating the need to use focused ion beam (FIB) or other measurement instruments to determine the probing depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Q. Tan, C. Beddingfield, and A. Mistry,1999 IEEE/CPMT Int. Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symp. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1999), pp. 320–324.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.L. Johnson,Contact Mechanics (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Li and B. Bhushan,IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 1616 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.A. Venkatesh, K.J. Van Vliet, A.E. Giannakopoulos, and S. Suresh,Scripta Mater. 42, 833 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Sugimoto and T. Kawaaguchi,IEEE Trans. Industrial Electron. 44, 696 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.S. Guzman, M. Hack, and G. Neubauer,IEEE Int. Reliability Physics Symp. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1994), pp. 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr,J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K.W. McElhaney, J.J. Vlassak, W.D. Nix, “Determination of Indenter Tip Geometry and Indentation Contact Area for Depth-sensing Indentation Experiments,” Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, www.-mse.stanford.edu.

  9. M. O’Hern, “Developments in Diamond Indentation and Scratch Tips: Introducing the AccuTip Family of Diamond Tips,” www.mts.com/nano/XP_specs, 2002.

  10. “TestWorks 4 Software for Nanoindentation Systems,” Version 012, Document No. D1418XPA-10629,MTS Manual (Eden Prairie, MN: MTS Systems Corp., 1999), pp. 1–65.

  11. D.G. Altenpohl,Aluminum: Technology, Applications, and Environment (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1999), p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “What is Cobra™,”VTech Japan Presentation Materials (Arlington Heights, IL: VTech Electronics North America, LLC, 2001).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, K.M., Chiang, K.N. Developing an analytic methodology to accurately predict probing depth in integrated circuit structures. J. Electron. Mater. 35, 257–265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692444

Key words

Navigation