Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental river diversion for marsh enhancement

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Nueces River is the primary source of freshwater inflow to Corpus Christi Bay and virtually the only source of freshwater inflow in the Nueces Delta. In association with reservoir development and operation within the Nueces Basin, the magnitude of freshwater inflow has been greatly reduced since 1958. Continually increasing salt concentrations in the soil and water have compromised the function of the delta as a viable component of the estuarine ecosystem. In 1993, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation began a 5-yr diversion project to increase the opportunity for freshwater flow into the delta. With the excavation of two overflow channels, the minimum flooding threshold for the upper delta was significantly lowered, and more frequent diversions of freshwater from the Nuecess River were enabled. During the 50-mo diversion period, the amount of freshwater diverted into the upper Nueces Delta was increased sevenfold. The average salinity gradient in the upper delta reverted to a more natural pattern, with average salinity concentrations decreasing from the lower (bay) to upper (riverine) delta, and a corresponding improvement in abundance and diversity of both intertidal vegetation and benthic communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, H. D. andK. H. Dunton. 2002. Freshwater inundation effects on the emergent vegetation of a hypersaline salt marsh.Estuaries 25:1426–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almonte, J. N. 1835. Statistical report on Texas. C. E. Castañeda (trans.), 1925The Southwestern Historical Quarterly 28:177–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, N. E.. 1982. Responses of Texas estuaries to freshwater inflows, p. 103–120.In V. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asquith, W. H., J. G. Mosier, andP. W. Bush. 1997. Status, trends and changes in freshwater inflows to bay systems in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area. CCBNEP-17. Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program, Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation. 2000a. Concluding Report: Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation. 2000b. Analysis of the historic flow regime of the Nueces River into the upper Nueces Delta, and of the potential restoration value of the Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. Appendix C Concluding Report: Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation. 2000c. Recent trends in precipitation occurring on the Nueces River watershed of South Texas. Appendix D, Concluding Report: Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Auston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation 2000d. Hydraulic Analysis of Rincon Bayou Using HEC-2, Rincon Bayou-Nueces Marsh Wetlands Restoration and Enhancement Project. U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Great Plains Regional Office. Billings, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, A. andJ. Hedgpeth. 1950. An introduction to the hydrography of tidal waters in Texas.Publications of the Institute of Marine Science 1:125–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scopeland, B. J.. 1966. Effects of decreased river flow on estuarine ecology.Journal of Water Pollution Control Feleration 38:1831–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiber, F. C.. 1986. Conservation of Tidal Marshes. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, N. andA. Harrington. 1943. Streamflow: Measurement, Records and Their Uses. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, W. E. (Ed.). 1956. William Bollaert's Texas. University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C. W. 1879. Survey of Aransas Pass and Bay up to Rockport and Corpus Christi, Texas and Corpus Christi Pass and Channel. Appendix K, Annual Report, Chief of Engineers. U.S. House of Representatives, 46th Congress, 2nd Session. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum, B. H.. 1951. The exchange of fresh and salt water in tidal estuaries.Journal of Marine Science Research 10:18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A. andR. D. Kalke. 1992 The effect of freshwater inflow on meiofaunal and macrofaunal populations in the Guadalupe and Nueces estuaries, Texas.Estuaries 15:307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A., R. D. Kalke andC. Ritter. 2002. Effect of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA.Estuaries 25:1436–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A., J. Li andG. T. Street. 1996. A conceptual ecosystem model of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area. Report CCBNEP-08. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W.. 1980. Between coastal marshes and coastal waters: A review of twenty years of speculation and research on the role of salt marshes in estuarine productivity and water chemistry. p. 437–525.In P. Hamilton and K. MacDonald (eds.), Estuarine and Wetland Processes with Emphasis on Modeling. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P.. 1961. The role of tidal marshes in estuarine production.New York State Conservation 16:12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T., P. Montagna andR. Kalke. 2002. Downstream effects of restored freshwater inflow to Rincon Bayou, Nueces Delta, Texas, USA.Estuaries 25:1448–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, A. C. 1894. A Man from Corpus Christi, or the Advantures of Two Bird Hunters and a Dog in Texan Bogs. Forest and Stream Publishing Company. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. W.. 1967. What is an estuary: physical viewpoint, p. 3–5.In G. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. Publication No. 83. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. H.. 1985. Evaluation of marsh enhancement by freshwater diversion.Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 111:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. andC. Montague. 1996. Estuaries, p. 12–1-12–114.In L. Mays (ed.), Water Resources Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. H.. 1997. Processes and trends of circulation within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area. Report CCBNEP-21. Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program, Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Irlbeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, G.H., Irlbeck, M.J. & Montagna, P.A. Experimental river diversion for marsh enhancement. Estuaries 25, 1416–1425 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692235

Keywords

Navigation