Abstract
This study examined the effects of task format and individual differences in cognitive ability on performance of the sentence-picture verification task. Four groups of subjects were selected on the basis of their scores on psychometric tests of verbal and spatial ability: low verbal/low spatial, high verbal/high spatial, low verbal/high spatial, and high verbal/low spatial. Subjects completed four different versions of the sentence verification task, each version differing in terms of the interval between sentence and picture presentation. The results confirmed the importance of both task format and spatial ability in determining the cognitive strategy employed by subjects in carrying out the task. The finding of principal interest, however, was that spatial ability was the most significant determinant of strategy choice, and that low spatial subjects made substantial use of linguistic strategies under task formats designed to encourage imaginal strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.
Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1976). Models of sentence verification and linguistic comprehension.Psychological Review, 83, 318–322.
Clark, H.H., & Chase, W.G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.
Clark, H.H., & Chase, W.G. (1974). Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions.Memory and Cognition, 2, 101–111.
Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., & Harman, H.H. (1976).Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, New Jersey.
Eley, M.G. (1981). Distinguishing imagery from propositional-recoding processes in sentence-picture verification tasks.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 254–269.
Gough, P.B. (1965). The verification of sentences: The effects of delay on evidence and sentence length.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 492–496.
Kroll, J.F., & Corrigan, A. (1981). Strategies in sentence-picture verification: The effect of an unexpected picture.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 220, 515–531.
MacLeod, C.M., Hunt, E.B., & Mathews, N.N. (1978). Individual differences in the verification of sentence-picture relationships.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 493–507.
Mathews, N.N., Hunt, E.B., & MacLeod, C.M. (1980). Strategy choice and strategy training in sentence-picture verification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 531–548.
Shoben, E.J. (1978). Choosing a model of sentence-picture comparisons: A reply to Catlin and Jones.Psychological Review, 85, 131–137.
Singer, M. (1977). A constituent comparison model of a picture-first verification task.Memory and Cognition, 5, 269–272.
Tanenhaus, M.K., & Bever, T.G. (1976). Sentence-picture verification models as theories of sentence comprehension: A critique of Carpenter and Just.Psychological Review, 83, 310–317.
Tversky, B, (1975). Pictorial encoding of sentences in sentence-picture comparisons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 405–410.
Wannemacher, J.T. (1976). Processing strategies in sentence comprehension.Memory and Cognition, 4, 48–52.
Wason, P.C., & Jones, S. (1963). Negatives: Denotation and connotation.British Journal of Psychology, 54, 299–307.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coney, J. Individual differences and task format in sentence verification. Current Psychology 7, 122–135 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686656
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686656