Skip to main content
Log in

The internal union political imperative for UAW pattern bargaining

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like many industrial unions, the UAW places great emphasis on pattern-following contract settlements. However, research on the rationales for pattern bargaining has been scarce, and evidence testing these rationales has been absent. The usual rationale for pattern bargaining is to take wages out of competition. However, this paper presents evidence of important internal union political reasons for pattern bargaining. If intra-union wage comparisons cause union members to feel unfairly treated, elected leaders will be challenged. Thus, the UAW leadership pursues pattern bargaining to minimize political conflicts and maintain stability.

Unless you know where you came from you don’t have the sense of direction that will lead you to the goals you seek.

Walter P. Reuther

That word “solidarity” isn’t rhetoric. For a union, it’s everything.

Bob White

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. Stacy. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” In Leonard Berkowitz, ed.,Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, William D. “Factionalism and Anti-Communism: Ford Local 600.”Labor History 20 (Spring 1979): 227–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boryczka, Ray. “Militancy and Factionalism in the United Auto Workers Union, 1937–1941.”Maryland Historian 8 (Fall 1977): 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, John W. “Pattern Bargaining, Wage Uniformity, and the United Auto Workers: An Empirical Analysis.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1991.

  • _____ “The Determinants and Extent of UAW Pattern Bargaining.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (April 1992): 523–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs. “UAW Wins Wage Parity at Chrysler, Tells Members to Stay on the Job.”Daily Labor Report, November 9, 1967, pp. A10–A11.

  • Cappelli, Peter, and Peter D. Sherer. “Satisfaction, Market Wages, and Labor Relations: An Airline Study.”Industrial Relations 27 (Winter 1988): 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons, John R.Labor and Administration. New York: MacMillan, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John T.Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: MacMillan, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “The Task of Contemporary Wage Theory.” In John T. Dunlop, ed.,The Theory of Wage Determination. London: MacMillan, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, Robert, and Jerald Greenberg. “Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personnel Systems.” In Kendrith M. Rowland and Gerald R. Ferris, eds.,Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 3. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Audrey, and William E. Fulmer. “Last Rites for Pattern Bargaining.”Harvard Business Review 60 (March–April 1982): 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. “Unionism and the Dispersion of Wages.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34 (October 1980): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Paul S. “An Examination of Referents Used in the Evaluation of Pay.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 12 (October 1974): 170–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, Charles C.The New Unionism. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, James V., and John F. Nehman. “GM To Pay $200 in Profit-Sharing, First Since ′85.”Detroit News, December 13, 1988, pp. A1, A8.

  • Hills, Frederick S. “The Relevant Other in Pay Comparisons.”Industrial Relations 19 (Fall 1980): 346–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T., and John T. Addison.The Economic Analysis of Unions. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, John, and Anthony Rusonik. “The Break-Up of an International Labour Union: Uneven Development in the North American Auto Industry and the Schism in the UAW.”Environment and Planning A 23 (January 1991): 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferys, Steve.Management and Managed: Fifty Years of Crisis at Chrysler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Harry C.Shifting Gears: Changing Labor Relations in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, and Robert B. McKersie.The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, James. “Electrical Products.” In Gerald G. Somers, ed.,Collective Bargaining: Contemporary American Experience. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Nelson.Labor’s War at Home: The CIO in World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Robert M.Collective Bargaining in the Automobile Industry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKersie, Robert B. “Negotiations in International Harvester Co.” In Arnold R. Weber, ed.,The Structure of Collective Bargaining. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____, Charles R. Perry. and Richard E. Walton. “Intraorganizational Bargaining in Labor Negotiations.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 9 (December 1965): 463–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Edward. “GM Workers Glum as Ford Pays Bonuses.”Detroit News, March 12, 1987, pp. A1, A6.

  • Moody, Kim.An Injury to All. New York: Verso, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, Richard T. “Equity Theory Predictions of Behavior in Organizations.” In Richard M. Steers and Lyman W. Porter, eds.,Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Charles R.Collective Bargaining and the Decline of the United Mine Workers. Philadelphia: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, Tom.New Forms of Work Organization: The Challenge for North American Unions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, Kathryn J. “Reply.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44 (October 1990): 160–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Lloyd G., and Cynthia H. Taft.The Evolution of Wage Structure. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, Simcha. “Equity Perceptions in Multiple Comparisons: A Field Study.”Human Relations 39 (April 1986): 333–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Arthur M.Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber, Ronald L. “Agricultural Machinery.” In David B. Lipsky and Clifford B. Donn, eds.,Collective Bargaining in American Industry. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Health, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip.Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrin, William.The Company and the Union: The “Civilized Relationship” of the General Motors Corporation and the United Automobile Workers. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, William E. “Refusal to Ratify Contracts.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 21 (July 1968): 518–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, Sumner H., James J. Healy, and E. Robert Livernash.The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Marjorie. “Profit Payout Elates Workers.”Detroit News, February 19, 1987, pp. A1, A12.

  • Stieber, Jack.Governing the UAW. New York: John Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, Peter.Fair Shares: Unions, Pay, and Politics in Sweden and West Germany. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker.Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • UAW. “Caterpillar Chief Locks Out 5,900; Says Workers Must ‘Tread Water.’”Solidarity, November–December, 1991, pp. 24–25.

  • Webb, Sidney, and Beatrice Webb.Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans, Green, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Bob.Hard Bargains: My Life on the Line. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Helpful comments by the Editor and an anonymous referee and financial support from the Jacob K. Javits Fellows Program, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, are gratefully acknowledged.

Walter P. Reuther collection, Box 98-2, Walter P. Reuther Library of Labor and Urban Affairs, Wayne State University (WSU). Walter P. Reuther was UAW President from 1946 to 1970.

White (1987, p. 51). Bob White was Director of the UAW Canadian Region from 1978 to 1985 and has been President of the National Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of Canada (CAW) since 1985.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budd, J.W. The internal union political imperative for UAW pattern bargaining. Journal of Labor Research 16, 43–55 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685712

Keywords

Navigation