Skip to main content
Log in

Labor arbitrators’ performance: Views from union and management perspectives

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses were carried out relating performance evaluations of labor arbitrators by union representatives to similar evaluations of the same arbitrators by management representatives. It was found that these evaluations are either unrelated or, in some cases, negatively related. An important consideration in the evaluations is whether an arbitrator’s awards tend to favor union or management. These results are dicussed in terms of the disparate values and “good arbitrator” views of arbitrator performance. Both views find some support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazerman, Max H. and Henry S. Farber. “Arbitrator Decision Making: When Are Final Offers Important?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (October 1985): 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Robert R. and Jane S. Mouton.Solving Costly Organizational Conflicts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, David E. and Christopher L. Cavanagh. “An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators.”American Economic Review 76 (June 1986): 408–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boals, Bruce R.Attitudinal Survey of Industrial Relations Managers in Tennessee Manufacturing Towards Arbitrators and Arbitration. Nashville: University of Tennessee, n.d.

  • Brown, L. David.Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Joseph P. and Michael J. Stahl. “Modeling the Policies of Several Labor Arbitrators.”Academy of Management Journal 26 (March 1983): 140–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Donald P.Personnel: The Management of Human Resources. Boston: Kent, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, DeWitt C. and Herbert A. Simon. “Selective Perception: A Note on the Departmental Identification of Executives.”Sociometry 21 (1958): 140–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, George W., Narash C. Agarwal, and Robert E. Trerise. “Union Leaders and Managers: A Comparison of Value Systems.”Industrial Relations 10 (May 1971): 211–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, Robert M.Personnel Testing, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, Herbert G. III and Marcus H. Sandver. “Arbitrators’ Backgrounds and Behavior.”Journal of Labor Research 4 (Spring 1983): 115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, John B.The School Administrator and Organizational Character. Eugene: University of Oregon Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Personality Tests as Predictors of Consulting Success.”Personnel Psychology 24 (Summer 1971): 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “The Development and Application of the Rated Ranking Technique in Performance Appraisal.”Journal of Occupational Psychology, in press.

  • Nelson, Nels E. and Earl M. Curry. “Arbitrator Characteristics and Arbitral Decisions.”Industrial Relations 20 (Fall 1981): 312–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezler, Julius and Donald Peterson. “Strategies for Arbitrator Selection.”Daily Labor Report June 26, 1978: D-1-D10.

  • Stagner, Ross and Hjalmar Rosen.Psychology of Union-Management Relations. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.”Annual Review of Psychology 33 (1982): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, Roger S. “Union Management Ideological Frames of Reference.”Journal of Management 8 (Fall 1982): 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, Arnold M.Arbitration in Practice. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, Cornell University, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crane, D.P., Miner, J.B. Labor arbitrators’ performance: Views from union and management perspectives. Journal of Labor Research 9, 43–54 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685228

Keywords

Navigation