Skip to main content

Unions, Collective Bargaining, and Firm Performance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics

Abstract

The impact of unions on firm performance has been the subject of debate and controversy in most industrialized countries, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom. The purpose of this chapter is to review and assess the scope and limitations of the economic analysis of unions as well as the controversies surrounding the conclusions of existing empirical research. Although it is difficult to draw firm and general conclusions on the effects of unions on firm performance, the existing results lead us to consider unions not solely in terms of their costs for the company. Empirical results suggest that unionism is often associated with higher productivity, but this relationship might vary across industries, institutional contexts, and over time. Estimates of the causal mechanisms through which unions affect productivity allow a better understanding of the effects of unions. The literature on the effect of unions on productivity recognizes that part of this effect may work through reducing employee turnover and other mechanisms, such as technological and organizational innovations, which are essential factors of productivity growth. Recent studies dealing with the effects of unions on firm profits support Freeman and Medoff’s (What do unions do? Basic Books, New York, 1984) conclusion that unionization is associated with lower profitability. The negative profit effect presumably explains the general business opposition to unionization, although management may also oppose unions because they reduce managerial autonomy and force managers to find ways to restore profitability. Finally, union activities, especially collective bargaining, trade off some economic efficiency for greater justice in workplaces and reduced inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intangible capital is an asset with no physical substance, in contrast to physical capital, like machinery or buildings. Examples of intangible capital are patents, copyright, franchises, trademarks, and so on.

References

  • Abowd J (1989) The effects of wage bargains on stock market value of the firm. Am Econ Rev 79:774–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Addison JT (2005) The determinants of firm performance: unions, works councils, and employee involvement/high-performance work practices. Scott J Polit Econ 52(3):406–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison JT, Belfield CR (2001) Updating the determinants of firm performance: estimating using the 1998 UK workplace employee relations survey. Br J Ind Relat 39(3):341–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison JT, Hirsch BT (1989) Union effects on productivity, profits, and growth: has the long run arrived? J Labor Econ 7(1):72–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison JT, Teixeira P (2019) Strikes, employee workplace representation, unionism, and trust: evidence from cross-country data. J Econ Behav Organ 159:109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison JT, Teixeira P, Evers K, Bellmann L (2017) Collective bargaining and innovation in Germany: a case of cooperative industrial relations? Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 56(1):73–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt TS, Sena V (2005) Unions: rent extractors or creators? Scand J Econ 107:103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SG (1986) Unionization and productivity in office building and school construction. ILR Rev 39(2):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SG (1988) Productivity levels and productivity change under unionism. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 27(1):94–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasson H (2014) The effect of decentralized wage bargaining on the structure of wages and firm performance. Ratio Working paper N°241, The Ratio Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Antcliff V, Saundry R (2009) Accompaniment, workplace representation and disciplinary outcomes in British workplaces – just a formality? Br J Ind Relat 47(1):100–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, Kalleberg AL, Bailey TA (2000) Manufacturing advantage: why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter O (1985) Evidence on US experiences with dispute resolution systems (No. 185). Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsmeier B (2017) Unions, collective relations laws and R&D investment in emerging and developing countries. Res Policy 46(1):292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth E, Bryson A, Dale-Olsen H (2017) Union density, productivity and wages. IZA discussion paper no. 11111. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt R, Welbourne T (2002) In: Katz J, Welbourne T (eds) Performance growth in entrepreneurial firms: revisiting the union-performance relationship, Research volume in entrepreneurship, vol 5. JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfield CR, Heywood JS (2004) Do HRM practices influence the desire for unionization? Evidence across workers, workplaces, and co-workers for Great Britain. J Lab Res 25(2):279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belman D (1992) Unions, the quality of labor relations and firm performance. In: Mishel L, Voos PB (eds) Unions and economic competitiveness. M.E. Sharpe, New York, pp 41–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Berton F, Dughera S, Andrea R (2018) Do unions affect innovation in Italy? Evidence from firm-level data. INAPP working paper n°2, November, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev Econ Stat 83(3):434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black SE, Lynch LM (2004) What’s driving the new economy? The benefits of workplace innovation. Econ J 114(493):F97–F116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Philippon T (2006) The quality of labor relations and unemployment. NBER working paper no. 10590. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower DG, Bryson A (2020) Now unions increase job satisfaction and well-being (No. w27720). National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower DG, Freeman RB (1992) Unionism in the United States and other advanced OECD countries. Ind Relat 31(1):56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth AL (1995) The economics of the trade union. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley D, Kim I, Tian X (2017) Do unions affect innovation? Manag Sci 63(7):2251–2271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Medoff JL (1978) Trade unions in the production process. J Polit Econ 86(3):355–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A (2007) The effect of trade unions on wages. Reflets Perspect Écon 46(2):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A, Dale-Olsen H (2020) Unions, tripartite competition and innovation (No. 13015). IZA discussion papers. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A, Wilkinson D (2002) Collective bargaining and workplace performance: an investigation using the Workplace Employee Relations Survey 1998. Employment relations research series no. 12. Department of Trade and Industry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A, Forth J, Kirby S (2005) High-involvement management practices, trade union representation and workplace performance in Britain. Scott J Polit Econ 52(3):451–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A, Charlwood A, Forth J (2006) Worker voice, managerial response and labour productivity: an empirical investigation. Ind Relat J 37(5):438–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson A, Forth J, Laroche P (2011) Evolution or revolution? The impact of unions on workplace performance in Britain and France. Eur J Ind Relat 17(2):171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabaleiro G, Gutiérrez F (2019) The relationship between unions and innovation in Chile. J Technol Manag Innov 14(4):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardullo G, Conti M, Sulis G (2015) Sunk capital, unions and the hold-up problem: theory and evidence from cross-country sectoral data. Eur Econ Rev 76:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Lee BBH, Lee WJ, Sohn BC (2017) Do labor unions always lead to underinvestment? J Manag Account Res 29(1):45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark K (1984) Unionization and firm performance: the impact on profits, growth and productivity. Am Econ Rev 74:893–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs J, Liu Y, Hall A, Ketchen D (2006) How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Pers Psychol 59(3):501–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly RA, Hirsch BT, Hirschey M (1986) Union rent seeking, intangible capital, and market value of the firm. Rev Econ Stat 68:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke WN (1994) Employee participation programs, group-based incentives, and company performance: a union-nonunion comparison. ILR Rev 47(4):594–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton JL, Tuttle JM (1986) Employee turnover: a meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Acad Manag Rev 11(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutrot T (1996) Relations sociales et performance économique: une première analyse empirique du cas français. Travail Emploi 66:39–66

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFina RH (1983) Unions, relative wages, and economic efficiency. J Labor Econ 1(4):408–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney JT, Godard J (2001) An industrial relations perspective on the high-performance paradigm. Hum Resour Manag Rev 11(4):395–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney JT, Huselid MA (1996) The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad Manag J 39:949–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny K (1997) Productivity and trade unions in British manufacturing industry 1973–85. Appl Econ 29(10):1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson AP, Geroski PA, Knight KG (1997) Productivity, efficiency and strike activity. Int Rev Appl Econ 11(1):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinardo J, Hallock KF (2002) When unions “mattered”: the impact of strikes on financial markets, 1925–1937. ILR Rev 55(2):219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinardo J, Lee DS (2004) Economic impacts of new unionization on private sector employers: 1984–2001. Q J Econ 119(4):1383–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos C, Laroche P (2003a) What do unions do to productivity? A meta-analysis. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 42(4):650–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos C, Laroche P (2003b) Unions and productivity growth: a meta-analytic review. In: Kato T, Pliskin J (eds) The determinants of the incidence and the effects of participatory organization. JAI Book series, vol 7. Elsevier Science, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos C, Laroche P (2003c) Unions and tangible investments: a review and new evidence in France. Ind Relat 58(2):314–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos H, Laroche P (2009) Unions and profits: a meta-regression analysis. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 48(1):146–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos H, Laroche P (2013) Unions and innovation: new insights from the cross-country evidence. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 52(2):467–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucouliagos H, Freeman RB, Laroche P (2017) The economics of trade unions: a study of a research field and its findings. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater S, Ingram P (2005) Have industrial relations in the UK really improved? Labour 19(2):373–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi K (2002) Unions as commitment devices. J Econ Behav Organ 47(4):407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang T, Ge Y (2012) Unions and firm innovation in China: synergy or strife? China Econ Rev 23(1):170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang T, Ge Y, Fan Y (2019) Unions and the productivity performance of multinational enterprises: evidence from China. Asian Bus Manag 18(4):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito J (2001) Human resource management practices and worker desires for union representation. J Lab Res 22(2):335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty S (1987) Strike activity, worker militancy, and productivity change in manufacturing, 1961–1981. ILR Rev 40(4):585–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB, Medoff JL (1979) New estimates of private sector unionism in the United States. ILR Review 32(2):143–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB (1983) Unionism, price-cost margins, and the return to capital. Working paper no 1164. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB (2005) What do unions do? The 2004 M-brane stringtwister edition. J Lab Res 26(4):641–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB, Lazear E (1995) An economic analysis of works councils. In: Rogers J, Streeck W (eds) Works councils: consultation, representation, and cooperation in industrial relations. NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RB, Medoff JL (1984) What do unions do? Basic Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnero A, Rycx F, Terraz I (2020) Productivity and wage effects of firm-level collective agreements: evidence from Belgian linked panel data. Br J Ind Relat 58(4):936–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y (2007) What do unions do in China? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031084

  • Gill C (2009) Union impact on the effective adoption of high-performance work practices. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittel JH, Von Nordenflicht A, Kochan TA (2004) Mutual gains or zero sum? Labor relations and firm performance in the airline industry. ILR Rev 57(2):163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard J (2004) A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. Br J Ind Relat 42(2):349–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest D (1995) Human resource management, trade unions and industrial relations. In: Human resource management: a critical text. Routledge, London, pp 110–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel J (2005) Unions and productivity again: new evidence from matched WERS and Business Census data. Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Heavey AL, Holwerda JA, Hausknecht JP (2013) Causes and consequences of collective turnover: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 98(3):412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT (1991) Labor unions and the economic performance of firms. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT (1997) Unionization and economic performance: evidence on productivity, profits, investment, and growth. Fraser Institute, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT, Addison JT (1986) The economic analysis of unions: new approaches and evidence. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT, Connolly R (1987) Do unions capture monopoly profits? ILR Rev 41(1):118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT, Link AN (1987) Labor union effects on innovative activity. J Lab Res 8(4):323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan C (2001) Enforcement of implicit employment contracts through unionization. J Labor Econ 19(1):171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid MA, Rau BL (1997) The determinants of high-performance work systems: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. In: Academy of Management annual meetings, pp 255–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo F, Mulki JP, Marshall GW (2005) A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational commitment and salesperson job performance: 25 years of research. J Bus Res 58(6):705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell SB, Stanley TD (1990) A meta-analysis of the union-nonunion wage gap. ILR Rev 44(1):54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirjahn U (2016) The contribution of labour economics to the analysis of unions and collective bargaining in Germany. In: Artus I, Behrens M, Keller B, Matiaske W, Nienhüser W, Rehder B, Wirth C (eds) Developments in German industrial relations. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirjahn U, Kraft K (2007) Intra-firm wage dispersion and firm performance – is there a uniform relationship? Kyklos 60(2):231–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karier T (1985) Unions and monopoly profit. Rev Econ Stat 67(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman BE (2004) Prospects for union growth in the United States in the early 21st century. In: Unions in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 44–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman BE, Taras DG (2010) Employee participation through non-union forms of employee representation. In: Wilkinson A, Gollan PJ, Lewin D (eds) The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilos M, Reshef Y (1997) The effects of workplace unionization on worker responses to HRM innovation. J Lab Res 18(4):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan TA, McKersie RB, Chalykoff J (1986) The effects of corporate strategy and workplace innovations on union representation. ILR Rev 39(4):487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarche C (2013) Industry-wide work rules and productivity: evidence from Argentine Union contract data. IZA J Labor Dev 2(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche P (2002) The effect of unions on workplace innovation: evidence from a French survey. Int Employ Relat Rev 8(2):35

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche P (2004) Présence syndicale et performance financière des entreprises: une analyse statistique sur le cas français. Financ Contrôle Strat 7(3):117–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche P (2016) A meta-analysis of the union–job satisfaction relationship. Br J Ind Relat 54(4):709–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche P, Salesina M (2017) The effects of union and nonunion forms of employee representation on high-performance work systems: new evidence from French microdata. Hum Resour Manag 56(1):173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche P, Wechtler H (2011) The effects of labor unions on workplace performance: new evidence from France. J Lab Res 32(2):157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Tao Z, Wang Y (2010) Union effects on performance and employment relations: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 21(1):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin SJ, Stewart MB (1990) Unions and the financial performance of British private sector establishments. J Appl Econ 5(4):327–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin SJ (1991) Unions and the capture of economic rents: an investigation using British firm-level data. Int J Ind Organ 9:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin S, Stewart M (1996) Trade unions and financial performance. Oxf Econ Pap 48(2):213–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin S, Wood S (2005) Human resource management as a substitute for trade unions in British workplaces. ILR Rev 58:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macky K, Boxall P (2007) The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects. Int J Hum Resour Manag 18(4):537–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu JE, Zajac DM (1990) A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychol Bull 108(2):171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho NA (1997) Unions and profitability over the 1980s: some evidence on union-firm bargaining in the United Kingdom. Econ J 107:651–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho N, Ulph D, Van Reenen J (1998a) R&D and unionism: comparative evidence from British companies and establishments. ILR Rev 52(1):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho N, Ulph D, Van Reenen J (1998b) The determination of R&D: empirical evidence on the role of unions. Eur Econ Rev 42(3–5):919–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho N, Ulph D, Van Reenen J (2003) Unions and innovation: a survey of the theory and empirical evidence. In: Addison JT, Schnabel C (eds) International handbook of trade unions. Edward Elgar, pp 293–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf D (2003a) Trade unions. In: The labour market under new labour. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 170–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf D (2003b) Unions and productivity, financial performance and investment: international evidence. In: Addison J, Schnabel C (eds) International handbook of trade unions. Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa M (2010) Labor unions and productivity: an empirical analysis using Japanese firm-level data. Labour Econ 17(6):1030–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann GR, Reder MW (1984) Output and strike activity in US manufacturing: how large are the losses? ILR Rev 37(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng I, Maki D (1994) Trade union influence on human resource management practices. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 33(1):121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman P (1994) How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? ILR Rev 47(2):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pil FK, MacDuffie JP (1996) The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 35(3):423–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack SL (1984) Prediction of employee unionization from knowledge of job satisfaction a meta–analytic investigation. Acad Manag Proc 1984(1):279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees A (1963) The effects of unions on resource allocation. J Law Econ 6:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruback R, Zimmerman M (1984) Unionization and profitability: evidence from the capital market. J Polit Econ 92:1131–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel C, Wagner J (1992a) Unions and innovation: evidence from German micro data. Econ Lett 39(3):369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel C, Wagner J (1992b) Unions and innovative activity in Germany. J Lab Res 13(4):393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel C, Wagner J (1994) Industrial relations and trade union effects on innovation in Germany. Labour 8(3):489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slichter S, Healy J, Livernash R (1960) The impact of collective bargaining on management. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanguy J (2013) Collective and individual conflicts in the workplace: evidence from France. Ind Relat: J Econ Soc 52(1):102–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull PJ (1991) Trade unions and productivity: opening the Harvard “black boxes”. J Lab Res 12(2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma A (2005) What do unions do to the workplace? Union effects on management and HRM policies. J Lab Res 26(3):415–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voos PB, Mishel LR (1986) The union impact on profits in the supermarket industry. Rev Econ Stat 68(3):513–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwani S (1990) The effect of unions on productivity growth, investment and employment: a report on some recent work. Br J Ind Relat 28(3):371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson D (2001) Collective bargaining and workplace financial performance in Britain. Policy Studies Institute, mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, de Menezes LM (2008) Comparing perspectives on high involvement management and organizational performance across the British economy. Int J Hum Resour Manag 19(4):639–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SJ, Wall TD (2007) Work enrichment and employee voice in human resource management-performance studies. Int J Hum Resour Manag 18(7):1335–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Responsible Section Editor: Uwe Jirjahn. The article has benefitted from valuable comments of the editors. There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrice Laroche .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Laroche, P. (2021). Unions, Collective Bargaining, and Firm Performance. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_204-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_204-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics