Skip to main content
Log in

Surface coverage effects on defibrillation impedance for transvenous electrodes

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transvenous defibrillation electrodes are constructed by wrapping conductive elements around an insulating base. However, these conductive elements do not cover the entire area of the base. The effects of varying the surface area coverage on the defibrillation impedance (DZ) are unknown. To understand the effects, four transvenous right ventricular test leads were specially fabricated. A ring design was used with 3 mm diameter cylinders equally spaced along a 5 cm length, ending 11 mm from the pacing tip. Three leads consisted of 4, 8 and 15 rings each of length ≈2.4 mm so that the coverages were 20%, 40%, and 70%, respectively. The fourth lead used 8 rings of length ≈1.2 mm each and had a coverage of 20%. DZ for each lead was obtained using three methods: (i) computer simulation; (ii)in vitro measurement in a tank; and (iii)in vivo measurement in nine dogs during defibrillation testing. The DZs from either of the first two methods correlated very well (r=0.98) with the mean DZs from the third method, indicating thatin vivo DZs can be predicted from computer andin vitro models. The study shows that: (i) at the same ring length, DZ decreases as coverage (number of rings) increases; (ii) at the same coverage, DZ decreases as ring length decreases; and (iii)in vivo, a statistically significant difference was observed in DZ between the leads with 20% coverage and the leads with higher coverages. No statistically significant difference was observed between leads with coverages >40%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accorti, P. R., Jr. Leads technology. In: Implantable cardioveter-defibrillator, chap. 8, edited by I. Singer and N. Y. Armonk. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company, 1994, pp. 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duck, F. A. Physical Properties of Tissue, Chapter 6. In: Electrical properties of tissue. London: Academic Press, 1990, pp. 167–223.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gileadi, E. Electrodes Kinetics for Chemists, Chemical Engineers, and Material Scientists. New York: VCH Publishers, 1993, pp. 1–597.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gill, R. M., R. J. Sweeny, and P. R. Reid. The defibrillation threshold: a comparison of anesthetics and measurement methods. PACE 16:708–714, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabowski, A. J., and J. Newman. Current and potential distributions on a cylinder electrode.J. Electrochem. Soc. 140: 1625–1631, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, Y., J. B. Fahy, and B. J. Tupper. Optimal electrode designs for electrosurgery, defibrillation, and external cardiac pacing.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 33:845–853, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang, D. J., J. E. Heil, S. J. Hahn, C. C. Lindstrom, and D. L. Derfus. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead technology: improved performance and lower defibrillation thresholds.PACE 18:548–559, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonelli, F. M., H. Wright, S. T. Latterell, R. S. Nelson, T. P. Adams, and M. W. Kroll. A long thin electrode is equivalent to a short thick electrode for defibrillation in right ventricle.PACE 18:221–224, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McDaniel, W. C., and J. C. Schuder. An up-down algorithm for estimation of the cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold.Med. Instrumen. 22:286–292, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newman, J. The fundamental principles of current distribution and mass transport in electrochemical cells. In Electro-analytical chemistry, vol. 6, edited by A. J. Bard, ed., New York: Marcel Dekker, 1973, pp. 189–342.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pendekanti, R. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Transvenous Stimulation and Defibrillation Electrodes: Model Development and Evaluation. Durham NC: Duke University, Ph.D. Thesis, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pendekanti, R., and C. Henriquez. Spatial potential and current distributions along transvenous defibrillation electrodes: variation of electrode characteristics.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24: 156–167, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pendekanti, R., C. Henriquez, P. Wolf, and D. Hoffmann. Effect of point of connection on the surface current profile over transvenous defibrillation electrodes. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference of the IEEE-EMBS, Montreal, Canada, 1995, pp. 311–312.

  14. Singer, I., J. Goldsmith, and C. Maldonado. Electrode surface-area is an important variable for defibrillation.PACE 18:233–236, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang, A.S.L., P. D. Wolf, Y. A. Afework, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker. Three-dimensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes.Circulation 85:1857–1864, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yabe, S., W. M. Smith, J. P. Daubert, P. D. Wolf, D. L. Rollins, and R. E. Ideker. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields.Circ. Res. 66:1190–1203, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, X., J. P. Daubert, P. D. Wolf, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker. Epicardial mapping of ventricular fibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.Circ. Res. 72:145–160, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ziemer, R. E., W. H. Tranter, and D. R. Fannin. Signals and Systems: Continuous and Discrete (second edition). New York: Macmillan, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pendekanti, R., Henriquez, C., Tomassoni, G. et al. Surface coverage effects on defibrillation impedance for transvenous electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng 25, 739–746 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684851

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684851

Keywords

Navigation