Skip to main content
Log in

Multisensory programs in the public schools: A brighter future for LD children

  • Part III In The Classroom
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A longitudinal study followed the progress of a group of elementary SLD students as they were instructed using the Alphabetic Phonics (AP) curriculum. After a three year period, the AP curriculum produced positive results in reading comprehension for most SLD students, particularly those who began the program in first and second grade. Students in resource and self-contained settings made significant gains in reading comprehension, although the two types of students exhibited different patterns of progress. Students of different ability levels responded differently to the AP curriculum. Average and above average students made significant progress in reading comprehension, but below average students did not advance substantially in relation to their ability level. At the end of three years, classroom teachers had a significantly more positive view of students’ word attack, oral reading, and silent reading comprehension skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calfee, R. C. and Piontkowski, D. C. 1981. The reading diary: Acquisition of decoding.Reading Research Quarterly 16:346–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. and Jacobs, V. A. 1983. Writing and reading in the elementary grades: Developmental trends among low SES children.Language Arts 60:617–626, 660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. 1988. Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Stanovich, K. E. 1986. Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?Annals of Dyslexia 35:67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, K. S., Reynolds, V. A., and Cochran, S. W. 1987. Multisensory teaching approach for reading, spelling, and handwriting, Orton-Gillingham based curriculum in a public school setting.Annals of Dyslexia 37:189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waites, L. and Cox, A. R. 1976.Remedial Training Programs for Developmental Language Disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P. 1987. Educational treatments for dyslexia at the elementary and secondary levels. InW. Ellis (ed.).Intimacy in the Language. Baltimore, MD: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogden, S., Hindman, S. & Turner, S.D. Multisensory programs in the public schools: A brighter future for LD children. Annals of Dyslexia 39, 247–267 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656912

Keywords

Navigation