Skip to main content
Log in

Hole capture at acceptors inp-type germanium

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hole capture data obtained by capacitance transient spectroscopy on eleven different acceptors in high-purity germanium are presented over the temperature range 8–160 K. Capture invariably proceeded faster than predicted by the cascade theory and did not follow theZ 3 T −3 dependence predicted by cascade theory, whereZ is the acceptor charge andT is the temperature. Instead it was found that capture followed the phenomenological relationship

$$\frac{{N_\upsilon }}{{gp\tau _c }} = kT/h\{ \eta exp (---E_a /kT) \} $$

whereN υ is the effective density of states at the valence band edge,g is the degeneracy of the ground state (four),p is the hole concentration,τ c is the mean capture time for the acceptor,k is Boltzman’s constant, andh is Planck’s constant.η is a dimensionless efficiency factor and exp (—E α /kT) is an activation term required to fit the data of some centers. The authors propose that transitions to the electronic ground state from band states or from bound excited states must be faster than previously considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Lax, Phys. Rev. 119, 1502 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. N. Abakumov, V. I. Perel, and I. N. Yassievich,Sov. Phys. Semicond. 12, 1 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See for example, M. Jaros, Deep Levels in Semiconductors, Adam Hilger LTD, Bristol (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. S. Darken and G. E. Jellison, Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1424 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. We could not distinguish among hydrogenic acceptors, so there is a possibility that one or more of these acceptor levels might be −110(1) with aA-/A° level which is hydrogenic.

  6. E. E. Haller, G. S. Hubbard, W. L. Hansen, and A. Seeger: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Radiation Effects in Semiconductors, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1976 (Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 31, Bristol, 1977), p. 309.

  7. R. N. Hall: Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Defects in Semiconductors, Coronado, USA, 1984 (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1985) p. 759.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. O. Evwaraye, R. N. Hall, and T. J. Soltys, IEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-26, No. 1, 271 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. E. Haller, P. P. Li, G. S. Hubbard, and W. L. Hansen, IEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-26, No. 1, 265 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Simoen, P. Clauws, J. Broeckx, J. Vennik, M. van Sande, and L. De Laet,IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. NS-29, No. 1, 789 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. F. Neumark and K. Kosai, p. 1 in Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol.19, ed. by R. K. Willardson and A. C. Beer, Academic Press Inc., New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. V. Lang and C. H. Henry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1525 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darken, L.S., Sangsingkeow, P. & Jellison, G.E. Hole capture at acceptors inp-type germanium. J. Electron. Mater. 19, 105–110 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655557

Key words

Navigation