Skip to main content
Log in

Electrochemical detection of fatigue damage

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical reoxidation currents are shown to provide a new method of detecting fatigue damage in metals. The basic principle is demonstrated by measurements on anodized samples of aluminum. The initial anodic oxide film is ruptured at the site of plastic deformation and the flow of charge is measured during subsequent reanodization, or healing of the oxide. In a preliminary series of experiments on tensile specimens, the total flow of charge is shown to be the sum of two components: i) that associated with charging the capacitor created by the metal specimen, the oxide film, and the electrolyte ii) that associated with reoxidation of the microcracks in the oxide film. The reoxidation component is in agreement with a simple model calculation of oxide rupture, and provides a quantitative measure of the total area of the microcracks in the oxide film. In the fatigue experiments these two components of charge flow are separated by a simple immersion scanning procedure, which also reveals the localized distribution of the damage. The flow of charge to these localized regions correlates with observations of the severity of the damage by scanning electron microscopy. Fatigue cracks ∼50 μm long or longer can be detected. In our specimens, these occurred after 10 percent of the fatigue life. The magnitude of the associated reanodization current transient is an accurate measure of the crack length and can predict the fatigue life within ±50 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. C. Grosskrcutz and G. G. Shaw:J. Appl. Phys., 1964, vol. 35, pp. 2195–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicolet Instrument Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.

  3. S. Tajima:Adv. Corrosion Science and Technology, 1970, vol. 1, pp. 229–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. J. Baxtcr and S. R. Rouze:J. Appl. Phvs., 1978, vol. 49, pp. 4233–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. J. Baxter:Mel. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 749–754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. J. Baxter:Mel. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 899–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. J. Baxter and S. R. Rouze:Met. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 647–654.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. E. Frost and D. S. Dugdale:J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1958, vol. 6, pp. 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Grosskreutz:J. Appl. Phys., 1962, vol. 33, pp. 1787–1792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. W. Liu:Trans. ASME Section D. J. Basic Eng., 1961, vol. 83, pp. 23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. R. Arnott, W. J. Baxter, and S. R. Rouze: General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Ml GMR-3199 Jan. 10, 1980.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baxter, W.J. Electrochemical detection of fatigue damage. Metall Trans A 11, 1999–2008 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655119

Keywords

Navigation