Skip to main content
Log in

Familial patterns of expression of specific reading disability in a population sample

Part 1. Prevalence, distribution, and persistence

  • Articles
  • Published:
Bulletin of the Orton Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A sample school population of 75 family units of equal size was investigated for expression of specific reading disability. 25.3% of the total children showed specific reading disability as defined in this study. By using spelling achievement as the criterion for the presence of the disability, the incidence of the disorder was shown to be much higher in certain families than in others, with clear sibling aggregation. The siblings of specific-reading-disability cases demonstrated lower spelling competence than the total siblings in normal families, even when well above a crippling level. Both within individual families and by grades, the spelling rating in relation to grade norms of the specific-reading-disability family cases with their siblings tended to decline with age, in contrast to normal families where it tended to improve with age. This pattern was even more striking if the greater language competence of females, now quite generally accepted and further supported by this study, was taken into account. It was demonstrated that the above patterns were not primarily a product of intelligence level or teaching methods. The bearing of these findings on the tenability of the most common, current hypotheses concerning causation was briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orton, S. T.: Reading, Writing and Speech Problems in Children. N. Y., Norton, 1937. (reprinted 1961)

  2. Hallgren, B.: Specific dyslexia. Acta psychiat. Scand. Suppl. 65, 1950.

  3. Gallagher, J. R.: Specific language disability (dyslexia). Clin. Proc. Child. Hosp. (Boston) 16:3–5, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rabinovitch, R. D., and Ingram, W.: Neuro-psychiatric considerations in reading retardation. Reading Teacher 15:433–438, 1961–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Hirsch, K.: Specific dyslexia or strephosymbolia. Folia phoniat. (Basel) 4:231–243, 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franklin, S. R.: A study of reading difficulties in Toronto School Children. Canad. Med. Ass. J. 85:237–239, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clements, S. R., and Peters, J. E.: Minimal brain dysfunction in first grade children. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 6:185–197, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Critchley, M.: The problem of developmental dyslexia. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 506:209–212, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen, V. H.: Strephosymbolia. An introsystemic disturbance of the synthetic function of the ego. Psychoanal. Stud. Child 10:83–99, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neville, D.: A comparison of the WISC patterns of male retarded and non-retarded readers. J. Educ. Res. 54:195–197, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn, R.: Delayed acquisition of reading and writing abilities in children: a neurological study. Arch. Neurol. (Chic.) 4:153–164, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pasamanick, B., Roger, M., and Lilianfeld, A.M.: Pregnancy experience and the development of behavior disorder in children. Amer. J. Psychiat. 112:613–618, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kawi, A.A., and Pasamanick, B.: Association of factors of pregnancy with reading disorders in childhood. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 166:1420–1423, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Preston, R. C. and Schneyer, J. W.: The neurological background of nine severely retarded readers. J. Educ. Res. 49:455–459, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wagenheim, L.: Learning problems associated with childhood’s diseases contracted at age two. Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 29:102–109, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bender, L.: A visual motor Gestalt test and its clinical use. Res. Monog. 3, Am. Orthopsychiat. Ass. N. Y., 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bender, L., and Yarnell, H.: An observation nursery. Amer. J. Psychiat. 97:1158–1172, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Hirsch, K.: Diagnosis of developmental language disorders. Logos 4:2–9, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Drew, A. L.: Neurological appraisal of familial congenital wordblindness. Brain 79:440–460, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soderling, B.: Studies on special disturbances within the reading-writing function in children ... II. Contribution to the question of origin. Acta Paediat (Uppsale) 51 (Suppl. 135): 219–224, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cole, E. M.: Specific reading disability, a problem in integration and adaptation. Amer. J. Ophthal. 34:226–232, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Money, J., ed.: Reading disability; progress and research needs in dyslexia. Baltimore, John Hopkins, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ettlinger, G., and Jackson, C. B.: Organic factors in developmental dyslexia. Proc. Ray. Soc. Med. 48:998–1000, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From the Language Clinic and Division of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, L., Cole, E.M. Familial patterns of expression of specific reading disability in a population sample. Bulletin of the Orton Society 15, 12–24 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653753

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653753

Keywords

Navigation