Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice

  • Part III Tools For Remediation
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article reports on a support services program for postsecondary students with learning disabilities that was found to be particularly conducive to the conversion of research findings into practical applications in such a way that it measurably enhanced students’ immediate and long-term academic performance. The results of both clinical and controlled research on persons with learning disabilities were applied to: (1) the prescription of services and compensatory strategies, including assistive technology, in relation to the diagnosis of specific disabilities; and (2) the preparation of a written composition curriculum for persons with learning disabilities which emphasizes the use of assistive computer technology. The paper concludes with an identification of those elements in the setting that appeared to promote the collaboration of both researchers and practitioners. These included: (1) location of the research staff both geographically and administratively within the service delivery unit; and (2) specific opportunities to accomplish joint goals that required intense communication and interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayer, A. J. 1952.Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J.I. 1987. Research into practice.School Psychology Review 16:317–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne-Smith, M., and Deck, M.D. 1989. A survey of postsecondary programs for students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:456–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, J.W. 1981. Persistent problems and concerns of young adults with learning disabilities. InBridges to Tomorrow, Vol. 2: The Best of ACLD, eds. W. Cruickshank and A. Silver. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1987.Computer Access in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities. Washington, DC: (FIPSE) U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursuck, W.D., and Jayanthi, M. 1993. Strategy instruction: Programming for independent study skill usage. InSuccess for College Students with Learning Disabilities, eds. S.A. Vogel and P.B. Adelman. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, B. 1982. ACLD vocational committee completes survey on LD adult.ACLD Newbriefs No.146,5:20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, B. 1981. Initial learning and transfer effects of microcomputer drills on LD students’ multiplication skills.Learning Disability Quarterly 9:118–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. 1990. The impact of microcomputer word processing on the performance of learning disabled students in a required first year writing course.Computers and Composition 8:49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni, B. 1979. Assisting dyslexic college students: An experimental design at a university.Bulletin of The Orton Society 29:263–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, C.A., and Smith, T.E. 1994. Serving individuals with specific learning disabilities in the vocational rehabilitation system. InLearning Disabilities in Adulthood: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues, eds. P.J. Gerber and H.B. Reiff. Stoneham, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajar, A.H. 1989. A computer analysis of written language variables and a comparison of compositions written by university students with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J.W., and MacMillan, C.J. B. 1987. Teaching research to teaching practice: A plea for theory.Journal of Research and Development in Education 20:38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P., Schnieders, C.S., Paradise, L.V., Reiff, H.B., Ginsberg, R.J., and Popp, P.A. 1990. Persisting problems of adults with LD: Self-reported comparison from school-age and adult years.Journal of Learning Disability 23:570–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R., Gerber, P.J., and Reiff, H.B. 1994. Employment success for adults with learning disabilities. InLearning Disabilities in Adulthood: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues, eds. P.J. Gerber and H.B. Reiff. Stoneham, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, K.N. 1983. College learning disabled writers: Error patterns and instructional alternatives.Journal of Learning Disabilites 16:334–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.H., and Raskind, M.H. 1993. Compensatory effectiveness of assistive technology on postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Preliminary findings.Eighth Annual Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities. Northridge, CA: California State University, Northridge Center on Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.H., and Raskind, M.H. 1995. The compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly 18:159–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.H., and Raskind, M.H. In preparation. The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities.

  • Hoffman, F.J., Sheldon, K.L., Minskoff, E.H., Sautter, S.W., Steidle, E.F., Baker, D.P., Bailey, M.B., and Echols, L.D. 1987. Needs of learning disabled adults.Journal of Learning Disabilities 20:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.J., and Blalock, J.W. (eds.). 1987.Adults with Learning Disabilities: Clinical Studies. Orlando, FL: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K.M., Torgesen, J.K. and Sexton, M.A. 1987. Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the hint and hunt I program.Journal of Learning Disabilities 20:122–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Learning Disabilities October, 1992.

  • Learning Disability Quarterly Summer, 1993.

  • Leong, C.K. 1992. Enhancing reading comprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer system.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4:205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., and Leong, C. K. 1986. Compensation in reading disabilities. InCommunication and Handicap: Aspects of Psychological Compensation and Technical Aids, eds. E. Hjelmquist and L Nilson. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangrum, C. T., and Strichart, S. S. 1988.College and the Learning Disabled Student. Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellard, DF. 1994. Services for students with learning disabilities in the community colleges. InLearning Disabilities in Adulthood: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues, eds. P.J. Gerber and H.B. Reiff. Stoneham, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosenthal, P. 1984. Research into practice.Elementary School Journal 85:199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chancellor, Division of Analytic Studies, California State University. 1994. CSUStateline, April, 1994. Los Alamitos, CA: California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Special Education Programs. 1992. Fourteenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K., and Wise, B.W. 1992. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4:107–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policastro, M.M. 1993. Assessing and developing metacognitive attributes in college students with learning disabilities. InSuccess for College Students with Learning Disabilities, eds. S.A. Vogel and P.B. Adelman. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M.H. 1993. Assistive technology for adults with learning disabilities: A rationale for use. InLearning Disabilities: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues, eds. P.J. Gerber and H.B. Reiff. Stoneham, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M.H., and Higgins, E.H. 1995. The effects of speech synthesis on proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with LD.Learning Disability Quarterly 18:141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M.H., and Higgins, E.H. In press. Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview.Learning Disability Quarterly.

  • Reiff, H.B., Gerber, P.J., and Ginsberg, R. 1994. Instructional strategies for long-term success.Annals of Dyslexia 54:270–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber, B., and Talpers, J. 1985. Campus access for learning disabled students. Washington, DC: Closer Look.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S.A. 1985. Syntactic complexity in written expression of LD college writers.Annals of Dyslexia 35:137–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S.A. 1987. Issues and concerns in LD college programming. InAdults with Learning Disabilities: Clinical Studies, eds. D.J. Johnson and J.W. Blalock. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S.A. 1993. A retrospective and prospective view of postsecondary education for adults with learning disabilities. InSuccess for College Students with Learning Disabilities, eds. S.A. Vogel and P.B. Adelman. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S.A., and Moran, M.R. 1982. Written language disorders in learning disabled students: A preliminary report. InComing of Age, Vol. 3: The Best of ACLD, eds. W.M. Cruickshank and J.W. Lerner. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiderholt, J.L. 1986.Formal Reading Inventory. Austin TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W.J. 1985. Perspectives on the education and training of learning disabled adults.Learning Disability Quarterly 8:231–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, W.J., Alley, G.R., Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., and Warner, M.M. 1982. Are there learning disabilities after high school?Exceptional Children 29:273–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, B.A., and Olson, R.K. 1992. How poor readers and spellers use interactive speech in a computer spelling program.Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4:145–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Frostig Center, Pasadena, California

    Eleanor L. Higgins

  2. California State University, Northridge, California

    Jennifer C. Zvi

Authors
  1. Eleanor L. Higgins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer C. Zvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higgins, E.L., Zvi, J.C. Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice. Annals of Dyslexia 45, 123–142 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648215

Keywords

Search

Navigation